Skip to main content

An Unfinished Journey—Lombardy on the Road to Decentralization

  • Chapter
Subsidiarity Governance
  • 75 Accesses

Abstract

The aim of the study is to analyze the Lombard, model of governance and to highlight the most important factors behind its success. To investigate the situation in which it was possible to introduce the principle of subsidiarity, we look at the enhanced possibilities for the Italian regions. Although autonomy is not as significant as was demanded by the region, it is sufficient to develop an “own governance” model at least on an experimental basis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ambrosanio, M. F., M. Bordignon, and F. Cerniglia (2010) “Constitutional reforms, fiscal decentralization and regional fiscal flows in Italy” in N. Bosch, M. Espasa, and A. Solé-Ollé (eds.), Political Economy of Interregional Fiscal Flows (Cheltenham: Elgar), 75–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armajani, B. (2009) “Subsidiarity and research: Means for the new challenges” in IReR, Punti di vista. Lombardia 2010 (Milan: Guerini), 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brugnoli, A., and G. Vittadini (2009) Subsidiarity: Positive Anthropology and Social Organization. Foundations for a New Conception of State and Market and Key Points of the Experience in Lombardy (Milan: Guerini).

    Google Scholar 

  • Colombo, A. (2008) “The ‘Lombardy model’: Subsidiarity-informed regional governance” in Social Policy & Administration, 42(2), 177–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colombo, A., and M.Mazzoleni (2007) “Innovating policies and government in an Italian region. Lombardy’s model of governance” in A. Brugnoli, A. Colombo, and M. Mazzoleni (eds.), Governance: The Lombardy Way. Assessing an Experience, Designing New Perspectives (Milan: Guerini) 53–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, J. W. (2002) Devolution in Context: Regional, Federal and Devolved Government in the European Union (London-Sydney: Cavendish), 101–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horváth, Gy. (1993) “Regionalism and devolution in the dual Italy.” Manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • IReR (2009a) Indagine su enti di ricerca ehe supportano igoverni regionali nel mondo (Milan).

    Google Scholar 

  • IReR (2009b) Lombardy Region. Economic and Institutional Features, an Experience in Government (Unpublished) (Milan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Keating, M. (1997) “The invention of regions: Political restructuring and territorial government in Western Europe” in Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 15, 383–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitson, M. (2009) “Local responses to global changes” in IReR, Punti di vista. Lombardia 2010 (Milan: Guerini), 78–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Grand, J. (2003) Motivation, Agency and Public Policy: OfKnijjhts and Knaves, Pawns and Queens (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Le Grand, J. (2007) The Other Invisible Hand. Delivering Public Services through Choice and Competition (Princeton-Oxford: Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Leadbeater, C. (2009) “Lombardy: A state of relationships” in IReR, Punti di vista. Lombardia 2010 (Milan: Guerini), 80-81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leicht, K. T., and J. C. Jenkins (eds.) (2010) Handbook of Politics. State and Society in Global Perspectives (New York and London: Springer).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowery, D. (1998) “Consumer sovereignty and quasi-market failure” in Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory, 2, 137-72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Migdal, J. S. (2004) State in Society (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mussati, G. (1993) “The development of the Lombardy region” in Gy. Horvâth (ed.), Development Strategies in the AlpineAdriatic Region (Pecs: Centre for Regional Studies Hungarian Academy of Sciences) 83-107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, M. (2003) “Quasi-markets in British health policy: A Longue Durée perspective” in Social Policy & Administration, 7, 725-41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, M. (2007) The ‘Horizontal’ Dimension: Decentralisation, Partnership and Governance of Welfare. June 1, 2007. Available on IReR website, http://www.irer.it/eventi/governancerelazionigiugno2007/Powellrelazione.pdf, accessed on October 4, 2011.

  • Sellers, J. M. (2010) “State-society relations beyond the Weberian state” in M. Bevir (ed.), Handbook of Governance (London: Sage Publications). Available at http://www.usc.edu/dept/polsci/sellers/Publications/Assets/State%20Society%20Relations%20JMS%2020090731.pdf, accessed on October 4, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Alessandro Colombo

Copyright information

© 2012 Alessandro Colombo

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lóránd, B. (2012). An Unfinished Journey—Lombardy on the Road to Decentralization. In: Colombo, A. (eds) Subsidiarity Governance. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137012104_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics