Abstract
Any election is defined in part by the policies which attain salience as key decision points for undecided voters. Inevitably, the majority of voters will take the policy position of their favoured candidate through identification or ideological proximity. However, for a small but potentially key section of the electorate, candidate positioning and candidate credibility on these policies will matter. In 2002, the saliency of law and order and immigration, and the mainstream’s ineffective positioning on this, ensured a strong enough performance by Jean-Marie Le Pen to progress to the second round. In 2007, the hard Right position adopted by Nicolas Sarkozy and the UMP was not a surprise in itself, but the extent to which this was embedded within the presidential ballot played a significant role in FN vote transfer.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2013 Jocelyn Evans and Gilles Ivaldi
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Evans, J., Ivaldi, G. (2013). Issues, Policy Debates and Candidate Valence. In: The 2012 French Presidential Elections. French Politics, Society and Culture. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137011640_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137011640_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-43647-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-01164-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social Sciences CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)