Skip to main content

Never Trust Anyone Who Remembers Jerry Rubin: The Promise of Generational Conflict

  • Chapter

Abstract

This chapter takes its title from a quote that has been attributed to 1960s radical and member of the infamous “Chicago Seven,” Jerry Rubin. Rubin supposedly stated “never trust anyone over 30” sometime in 1968,1 although recently this has become disputed and the more likely origin of the quote is civil rights leader Jack Weinberg from a 1965 interview with a San Francisco Chronicle reporter. But the fact that Rubin didn’t originally say it is even more relevant to a chapter on generational analysis. For one, it shows how the memory of an event (in this case a statement) can transform for individuals the particular details as they really happened. Rubin himself never dissuaded the public that he coined the term, or at least used it, and in many ways provide us an example of Friedrich Nietzsche’s notion about memory yielding to pride.2 For another, when reflecting back upon its use, Rubin demonstrated the flip side to the coin of generational conflict on his 50th birthday, mentioning to a New York Times reporter that: “I used to say don’t trust anyone over 30,” he said. “Now I say don’t trust anyone under 50.”3

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Morley Winograd, and Michael D. Hais, Millennial Makeover (Piscataway, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Arthur Schlesinger, Jr., “Tides of American Politics,” Yale Review 39 (1939): 219–224.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Frank Klingberg, “The Historical Alternation of Moods in American Foreign Policy,” World Politics 4, (1952) 239–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Michael Roskin, “From Pearl Harbor to Vietnam: Shifting Generational Paradigms and Foreign Policy,” Political Science Quarterly 3, 89 (1974): 563–588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kratochwil notes that such a historical enterprise then rests not upon finding transhistorically valid phenomena, but rather locating (and I do like these terms) the “pockets” or “holes rather than in the averages or generalities.” Friedrich V. Kratochwil, “Constructivism as an Approach to Interdisciplinary Study,” in Constructing International Relations: The Next Generation, ed. Karin M. Fierke and Knud Erik Jorgensen (New York: ME Sharpe, 2001), 13–35, 32.

    Google Scholar 

  6. W. Strauss, and N. Howe, Generations: The History of America’s Future, 1584 to 2069 (New York: Morrow, 1991); and Winograd and Hais, Millennial Makeover.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Robert Jervis, “Hypotheses on Misperception,” World Politics 20 (April 1968): 454–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Yacov Vertzberger, The World in Their Minds (Stanford, California: Stanford University Press, 1990), 315.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hugo Reinert and Erik Reinert, eds., Friedrich Nietzsche (1844–1900) (New York: Springer, 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Joseph, A. Schumpeter, Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy (New York: Harper Perennial, 1962), 83.

    Google Scholar 

  11. See Anthony Giddens, The Constitution of Society (Berkeley, California: University of California Press, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Douglas Copeland, Generation X: Tales for an Accelerated Culture (New York: St. Martin’s Griffin 1991), 23.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jeff Gordinier, X Saves the World (Viking Press, 2008), 47.

    Google Scholar 

  14. I have discussed in my other work the aesthetic element of generational memory (Steele, Defacing Power [Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan Press, 2010], chapter 2). Such memory can also be reinforced via artistic expressions such as music and film. The Gordinier quote hits on this a bit—but one could go further to discuss the fictional representations of the 1960s, and Vietnam especially, that began to emerge in US pop culture with movies such as The Deerhunter, Apocalypse Now, to 1980s films such as Platoon, Full Metal Jacket, Hamburger Hill, and Born on the Fourth of July.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Nicholas Onuf, World of Our Making (Columbia, South Carolina: University of South Carolina Press, 1989), 155–156.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Thomas, S. Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962), 158.

    Google Scholar 

  17. For a complex take on how this worked in Eastern Europe, including Germany, before the fall of the Berlin Wall, see Roland Bleiker’s approach to “transversal dissent,” Bleiker, Popular Dissent, Human Agency and Global Politics (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2000).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. Mark Randal Brawley, Power, Money and Trade (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2005), p. 118.

    Google Scholar 

  19. See Francois Debrix’s, (Re)envisioning Peacekeeping (Minneapolis, Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  20. See Steele, Ontological Security in International Relations (London, UK: Routledge, 2008), 18–20.

    Google Scholar 

  21. See Anthony, F. Lang, Agency and Ethics (New York: SUNY, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  22. The notion of “proteges” at the elite level helps provide an intellectual continuity to this tribalism. The neoconservative movement in the United States has been especially adept, even entrepreneurial, in its ability to transfer tropes about internal, decadent US “others” from one generation to another, see Brian Schmidt, and Michael, C. Williams, “The Bush Doctrine and the Iraq War: Neoconservatives versus Realists,” Security Studies, 2008, 17, 2: 191–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. John Dewey, Human Nature and Conduct (New York: Henry Holt and co., 1922).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Keith, R. Billingsley and Clyde Tucker, “Generations, Status and Party Identification,” Political Behavior 9, 4 (1987): 305–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ernst Bertram, with Robert Norton, Nietzsche: Attempt at a Mythology (Champagne-Urbana, Illinois: University of Illinois Press, 2009), 123.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Yacov Vertzberger, “The Practice and Power of Collective Memory,” Review of Trauma and the Memory of Politics, International Studies Review 7, 1 (2005): 117–120, 120.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Brian Schmidt, “On the History and Historiography of International Relations,” in Handbook of International Relations, ed. Walter Carlsnaes, Thomas Risse, and Beth, A. Simmons (London: Sage, 2002), 3–22, 9.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. See, of course, the first statements on the transnational possibilities for academic synthesis in (Haas 1989), and for critiques of the uniformity of such communities (Youde 2005; 2007). Peter, M. Haas, “Do Regimes Matter? Epistemic Communities and Mediterranean Pollution Control” International Organization 43, 3 (1989): 377–403,

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Jeremy Youde, “The Development of a Counter-Epistemic Community: AIDS, South Africa, and International Regimes” International Relations 19, 4 (2005): 421–439;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. and Youde, AIDS, South Africa and the Politics of Knowledge, (Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Valerie Hudson, “Foreign Policy Analysis: Actor-Specific Theory and the Ground of International Relations,” Foreign Policy Analysis 1, 1 (2005): 1–30, 8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Ken Booth, “Three Tyrannies,” in Human Rights in Global Politics, ed. Tim Dunne and Nicholas J. Wheeler (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge, 1999), 31–70, 44.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  33. Tony Smith, Pact with the Devil (Routledge, 2007), 85.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Nils Peter Gleditsch, “The Liberal Moment Fifteen Years On: Presidential Address, 49th Convention of the International Studies Association,” International Studies Quarterly 52, 4 (2008): 691–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Martin Shaw, “The Unfinished Global Revolution: Intellectuals and the New Politics of International Relations,” Review of International Studies 27, 3 (2001): 627–647.

    Google Scholar 

  36. James Rosenau, “Courage versus Caution: A Dialogue on Entering and Prospering in IR,” International Studies Review, 6, 3 (2004): 511–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Vibeke Schou Tjalve, Realist Strategies of Republican Peace (New York: Palgrave, 2008), 3;

    Book  Google Scholar 

  38. see also Lang, Agency and Ethics, and Steele, “Of Witch’s Brews and Scholarly Communities: The Dangers and Promise of Academic Parrhesia,” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 23: 1, 49–68 (March 2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Benjamin Herborth, “Everyday Exceptions: The Paradox of a Perpetual State of Emergency,” Chapter presented at the “Uses of the West” conference, Bad Homburg, Germany, October 2009, 11.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Brent J. Steele Jonathan M. Acuff

Copyright information

© 2012 Brent J. Steele and Jonathan M. Acuff

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Steele, B.J. (2012). Never Trust Anyone Who Remembers Jerry Rubin: The Promise of Generational Conflict. In: Steele, B.J., Acuff, J.M. (eds) Theory and Application of the “Generation” in International Relations and Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137011565_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics