Skip to main content

The Myth of the Russian ‘Unique Path’ and Public Opinion

  • Chapter
Waiting for Reform under Putin and Medvedev
  • 88 Accesses

Abstract

How to understand the concept of the ‘Unique Russian path’, that is, the belief in a special Russian destiny which today constitutes a fundamental part of Russian official rhetoric and is widespread in Russian society? This chapter analyses the symbolic policy of the Russian authorities and the symbolic practices of the Russian public. They are connected through the institutional channels of school, press, and above all television. The analysis is based on Russian nationwide polls of the adult (over 18 years of age) population that were conducted over more than two decades by the Levada Analytical Center.1 The analytical approach is a form of sociological hermeneutics. It separates the semantic layers of various symbolic formations in public use, in particular the mythologeme (ideologeme) of a ‘Russian special path’ — my current subject of interest — and interprets them as elements of orientation and identification in various groups of Russian society. In addition, the semantic actions of other collective actors and the operation of communication channels between the participants are taken into consideration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. For more information see L. Borusyak (2010), ‘“Staroe Dobroe Kino” i post-sovetskii opyt’ [‘Good Old Cinema’ and Post-Soviet Experience], Vestnik obshchestvennogo mneniya [The Russian Public Opinion Herald], No. 1, pp. 90–101.

    Google Scholar 

  2. The idea and ideology of Sonderweg in Germany, as well as the emphasis on the uniqueness in Spain (Hispanidad), Turkey and other countries of delayed or belated modernization, are parts of a historical phase and do not constitute any fundamental mechanism of collective self-identification or symbolic reproduction of a ‘lost’ unity and the ‘return’ to it. The idea of multiple ways of modernization developed by a number of social and political scientists since the 1980s (see e.g. Eisenstadt S. N. (2009), Multiple Modernities: Der Streit um die Gegenwart. Berlin: Kadmos) makes senseless the ideologeme of a Russian ‘unique path’ with the content and functions given by Russian ideologues and analytically reconstructed in this article.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Coser, L. A. (1974), Greedy Institutions: Patterns of Undivided Commitment (New York: Free Press).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2012 Boris Dubin

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dubin, B. (2012). The Myth of the Russian ‘Unique Path’ and Public Opinion. In: Jonson, L., White, S. (eds) Waiting for Reform under Putin and Medvedev. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137011206_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics