Abstract
This chapter presents a regional case study that analyses the role of the ‘party of power’, United Russia, in the policy of centralization pursued by Vladimir Putin since he became president in 2000. How does the party’s increasing influence on political recruitment at the regional and local levels contribute to the reinforcing of central authority over regional elites, especially the governors? I focus on the candidate selection process in the Novgorod region — which is situated in the northwestern federal district of Russia, between Moscow and St Petersburg — and more specifically on the developments of 2007–08, when a significant part of the former regional political elite was replaced. The study of United Russia’s political recruitment in the Russian regions will also shed light on the party’s role and autonomy in the contemporary Russian political system.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
G. M. Hahn (2001), ‘Putin’s Federal Reforms: Reintegrating Russia’s Legal Space or Upsetting the Metastability of Russia’s Asymmetrical Federalism’, Demokratizatsiya, Vol. 9, No. 4, Fall, pp. 498–530.
V. Gelman, ‘Leviathan’s Return: The Policy of Recentralization in Contemporary Russia’ in C. Ross and A. Campbell (eds) (2009), Federalism and Local Politics in Russia (London and New York: Routledge), pp. 1–25.
K. Wilson (2006), ‘Party-system Development under Putin’, Post-Soviet Affairs, Vol. 22, No. 4, October, pp. 314–48.
V. Gelman (2006), ‘Perspektivy dominiruyushchei partii v Rossii [The Perspectives of the Dominant Party in Russia], Pro et Contra, July, pp. 62–71.
R. Smyth (2002), ‘Building State Capacity from the Inside Out: Parties of Power and the Success of the President’s Reform Agenda in Russia’, Politics & Society, Vol. 30, No. 4, December, p. 556.
D. Slider (2010), ‘How United is United Russia? Regional Sources of Intra-party Conflict’, Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, Vol. 26, No. 2, p. 272.
Vladislav Surkov (2006), ‘Suverenitet — eto politicheskii sinonim konkurent-osposobnosti’, [Sovereignty is a Political Synonym of Competitiveness], Speech to United Russia cadres, 7 February, http://rumol.ru/files/library/articles/future/suverenitet_politicheskij_sinonim_konkurentosposobnosti.pdf.
B. Geddes (2003), Paradigms and Sand Castles: Theory Building and Research Design in Comparative Politics (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press), pp. 51–2.
V. Gelman (2006), ‘Perspektivy dominiruyushchei partii v Rossii” [The Perspectives of the Dominant Party in Russia], Pro et Contra, July, pp. 62–71.
A. Konitzer (2005), Voting for Russia’s Governors Regional Elections and Accountability under Yeltsin and Putin (Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press), p. 219.
N. N. Petro (2004), Crafting Democracy: How Novgorod has Coped with Rapid Social Change (Ithaca, N.Y., London: Cornell University Press); and
B. A. Ruble and N. E. Popson (1998), ‘The Westernization of a Russian Province: The Case of Novgorod’, Post-Soviet Geography and Economics, Vol. 39, No. 8, October, pp. 433–46.
Mikhail Prusak was born in 1960 in western Ukraine. His national political career started when he was elected to the USSR Supreme Soviet in 1989. For a detailed biography see R. W. Orttung, D. N. Lussier and A. Paretskaya (eds) (2000), The Republics and Regions of the Russian Federation: A Guide to Politics, Policies, and Leaders (Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe) pp. 383–6.
O. Kryshtanovskaya (2004), Anatomiya rossiiskoi elity [The Anatomy of the Russian Elite] (Moscow: Zakharov), p. 140.
Petro (2001), ‘Creating Social Capital in Russia: The Novgorod Model’, World Development, Vol. 29, No. 2, p. 232.
V. Gelman, S. Ryzhenkov and M. Brie (eds) (2003), Making and Breaking Democratic Transitions: The Comparative Politics of Russia’s Regions (Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield), p. 25.
H. Oversloot and R. Verheul (2006), ‘Managing Democracy: Political Parties and the State in Russia’, Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, Vol. 22, No. 3, September, pp. 395–8.
R. W. (2000), The Republics and Regions of the Russian Federation: A Guide to Politics, Policies, and Leaders (Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe) pp. 384–5.
Vladimir Gelman defines ‘satellites parties’ as ‘Kremlin-driven “projects” [that] served two basic — and not mutually exclusive — goals: first, to form a reserve or substitute to the party of power and avoid placing too many eggs in one basket (especially given the background of transitional uncertainty); and second, to weaken the oppositions of various colours by splitting their votes by spoiler parties’, V. Gelman (2008), ‘Party Politics in Russia: From Competition to Hierarchy’, Europe-Asia Studies, Vol. 60, No. 6, August, p. 922.
According to Nezavisimaya gazeta’s sources, Mikhail Prusak consulted the president before taking the decision to head the Democratic Party of Russia: Olga Tropkina (2001), ‘U “Edinstva” poyavilsya novyi konkurent’ [‘Edinstvo’ Got a New Rival], Nezavisimaya gazeta, 31 August, http://www.ng.ru/politics/2001-08-31/3_konkurent.html.
Valerii Tsygankov (2003), ‘Lyublyu. Tseluyu. Prusak’ [I Love, I Kiss, Prusak], Nezavisimaya Gazeta, 3 March, http://www.ng.ru/politics/2003-03-03/2_prusak.html.
Andrei Riskin (2003), ‘Prusak “edinorossam” ne tovarishch’ [To Members of “United Russia” is Prusak No Comrade], Nezavisimaya gazeta, 9 April, http://www.ng.ru/politics/2003-04-09/2_prusak.html.
A. Konitzer (2005), Voting for Russia’s Governors: Regional Elections and Accountability under Yeltsin and Putin (Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press), p. 222.
Vladimir Lysenko (2005), ‘Naznachenie gubernatorov — put k odnopartiinoi sisteme’ [The Appointment of Governors — the Road to a One-Party System], Nezavisimaya gazeta, 24 March, http://www.ng.ru/politics/2005-03-24/2_er.html.
A. Kynev, ‘Electoral Reforms and Democratization: Russian Regional Elections 2003–2006’, in C. Ross and A. Campbell (2009), Federalism and Local Politics in Russia (New York: Routledge), p. 121.
E. Chebankova (2006), ‘The Unintended Consequences of Gubernatorial Appointments in Russia: 2005–6’, Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, Vol. 22, No. 4, December, pp. 464–9.
D. Slider, ‘Putin and the Election of Regional Governors’, in C. Ross and A. Campbell (2009), Federalism and Local Politics in Russia (New York: Routledge), p. 114.
Mikhail Vinogradov (2007), ‘Gubernatory na peredovom fronte izbiratelnoi kampanii’ Governors at the Frontline of the Election Campaign], Nezavisimaya Gazeta, 14 August, http://www.ng.ru/politics/2007-08-14/3_kartblansh.html.
A. Pravda (ed.) (2005), Leading Russia: Putin in Perspective (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press), p. 175.
National Institute for the Development of Contemporary Ideology (2007), ‘Cadre Reserve: Approaches and Methods’, Material for the “Centre of Social and Conservative Policy” session’, 7 April, http://www.cscp.ru/clauses/52/c/2640.
D. S. Hutcheson, ‘Russia: electoral campaigning in a “managed democracy”’, in D. W. Johnson (2008), Routledge Handbook of Political Management (New York: Routledge), p. 339.
C. Ross (2009), Local Politics and Democratization in Russia (New York: Routledge), p. 182.
M. Grigorev (2008), Final novgorodskogo chikago [Finale for the Novgorod Chicago] (Moscow: Fond issledovaniya problem demokratii).
Aleksei Gromskii (2007), ‘Chto skazal Klebanov?’ [What Did Klebanov Say?], Novye Khroniki, 5 July, http://novchronic.ru/716.htm.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2012 Clementine Fauconnier
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fauconnier, C. (2012). United Russia’s Political Recruitment in the Russian Regions and ‘the Strengthening of the Power Vertical’: The Case of Novgorod Region. In: Jonson, L., White, S. (eds) Waiting for Reform under Putin and Medvedev. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137011206_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137011206_10
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-43641-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-01120-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)