Skip to main content

United Russia’s Political Recruitment in the Russian Regions and ‘the Strengthening of the Power Vertical’: The Case of Novgorod Region

  • Chapter
Waiting for Reform under Putin and Medvedev
  • 99 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter presents a regional case study that analyses the role of the ‘party of power’, United Russia, in the policy of centralization pursued by Vladimir Putin since he became president in 2000. How does the party’s increasing influence on political recruitment at the regional and local levels contribute to the reinforcing of central authority over regional elites, especially the governors? I focus on the candidate selection process in the Novgorod region — which is situated in the northwestern federal district of Russia, between Moscow and St Petersburg — and more specifically on the developments of 2007–08, when a significant part of the former regional political elite was replaced. The study of United Russia’s political recruitment in the Russian regions will also shed light on the party’s role and autonomy in the contemporary Russian political system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. G. M. Hahn (2001), ‘Putin’s Federal Reforms: Reintegrating Russia’s Legal Space or Upsetting the Metastability of Russia’s Asymmetrical Federalism’, Demokratizatsiya, Vol. 9, No. 4, Fall, pp. 498–530.

    Google Scholar 

  2. V. Gelman, ‘Leviathan’s Return: The Policy of Recentralization in Contemporary Russia’ in C. Ross and A. Campbell (eds) (2009), Federalism and Local Politics in Russia (London and New York: Routledge), pp. 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  3. K. Wilson (2006), ‘Party-system Development under Putin’, Post-Soviet Affairs, Vol. 22, No. 4, October, pp. 314–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. V. Gelman (2006), ‘Perspektivy dominiruyushchei partii v Rossii [The Perspectives of the Dominant Party in Russia], Pro et Contra, July, pp. 62–71.

    Google Scholar 

  5. R. Smyth (2002), ‘Building State Capacity from the Inside Out: Parties of Power and the Success of the President’s Reform Agenda in Russia’, Politics & Society, Vol. 30, No. 4, December, p. 556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. D. Slider (2010), ‘How United is United Russia? Regional Sources of Intra-party Conflict’, Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, Vol. 26, No. 2, p. 272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Vladislav Surkov (2006), ‘Suverenitet — eto politicheskii sinonim konkurent-osposobnosti’, [Sovereignty is a Political Synonym of Competitiveness], Speech to United Russia cadres, 7 February, http://rumol.ru/files/library/articles/future/suverenitet_politicheskij_sinonim_konkurentosposobnosti.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  8. B. Geddes (2003), Paradigms and Sand Castles: Theory Building and Research Design in Comparative Politics (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press), pp. 51–2.

    Google Scholar 

  9. V. Gelman (2006), ‘Perspektivy dominiruyushchei partii v Rossii” [The Perspectives of the Dominant Party in Russia], Pro et Contra, July, pp. 62–71.

    Google Scholar 

  10. A. Konitzer (2005), Voting for Russia’s Governors Regional Elections and Accountability under Yeltsin and Putin (Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press), p. 219.

    Google Scholar 

  11. N. N. Petro (2004), Crafting Democracy: How Novgorod has Coped with Rapid Social Change (Ithaca, N.Y., London: Cornell University Press); and

    Google Scholar 

  12. B. A. Ruble and N. E. Popson (1998), ‘The Westernization of a Russian Province: The Case of Novgorod’, Post-Soviet Geography and Economics, Vol. 39, No. 8, October, pp. 433–46.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mikhail Prusak was born in 1960 in western Ukraine. His national political career started when he was elected to the USSR Supreme Soviet in 1989. For a detailed biography see R. W. Orttung, D. N. Lussier and A. Paretskaya (eds) (2000), The Republics and Regions of the Russian Federation: A Guide to Politics, Policies, and Leaders (Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe) pp. 383–6.

    Google Scholar 

  14. O. Kryshtanovskaya (2004), Anatomiya rossiiskoi elity [The Anatomy of the Russian Elite] (Moscow: Zakharov), p. 140.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Petro (2001), ‘Creating Social Capital in Russia: The Novgorod Model’, World Development, Vol. 29, No. 2, p. 232.

    Google Scholar 

  16. V. Gelman, S. Ryzhenkov and M. Brie (eds) (2003), Making and Breaking Democratic Transitions: The Comparative Politics of Russia’s Regions (Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield), p. 25.

    Google Scholar 

  17. H. Oversloot and R. Verheul (2006), ‘Managing Democracy: Political Parties and the State in Russia’, Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, Vol. 22, No. 3, September, pp. 395–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. R. W. (2000), The Republics and Regions of the Russian Federation: A Guide to Politics, Policies, and Leaders (Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe) pp. 384–5.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Vladimir Gelman defines ‘satellites parties’ as ‘Kremlin-driven “projects” [that] served two basic — and not mutually exclusive — goals: first, to form a reserve or substitute to the party of power and avoid placing too many eggs in one basket (especially given the background of transitional uncertainty); and second, to weaken the oppositions of various colours by splitting their votes by spoiler parties’, V. Gelman (2008), ‘Party Politics in Russia: From Competition to Hierarchy’, Europe-Asia Studies, Vol. 60, No. 6, August, p. 922.

    Google Scholar 

  20. According to Nezavisimaya gazeta’s sources, Mikhail Prusak consulted the president before taking the decision to head the Democratic Party of Russia: Olga Tropkina (2001), ‘U “Edinstva” poyavilsya novyi konkurent’ [‘Edinstvo’ Got a New Rival], Nezavisimaya gazeta, 31 August, http://www.ng.ru/politics/2001-08-31/3_konkurent.html.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Valerii Tsygankov (2003), ‘Lyublyu. Tseluyu. Prusak’ [I Love, I Kiss, Prusak], Nezavisimaya Gazeta, 3 March, http://www.ng.ru/politics/2003-03-03/2_prusak.html.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Andrei Riskin (2003), ‘Prusak “edinorossam” ne tovarishch’ [To Members of “United Russia” is Prusak No Comrade], Nezavisimaya gazeta, 9 April, http://www.ng.ru/politics/2003-04-09/2_prusak.html.

    Google Scholar 

  23. A. Konitzer (2005), Voting for Russia’s Governors: Regional Elections and Accountability under Yeltsin and Putin (Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press), p. 222.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Vladimir Lysenko (2005), ‘Naznachenie gubernatorov — put k odnopartiinoi sisteme’ [The Appointment of Governors — the Road to a One-Party System], Nezavisimaya gazeta, 24 March, http://www.ng.ru/politics/2005-03-24/2_er.html.

    Google Scholar 

  25. A. Kynev, ‘Electoral Reforms and Democratization: Russian Regional Elections 2003–2006’, in C. Ross and A. Campbell (2009), Federalism and Local Politics in Russia (New York: Routledge), p. 121.

    Google Scholar 

  26. E. Chebankova (2006), ‘The Unintended Consequences of Gubernatorial Appointments in Russia: 2005–6’, Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, Vol. 22, No. 4, December, pp. 464–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. D. Slider, ‘Putin and the Election of Regional Governors’, in C. Ross and A. Campbell (2009), Federalism and Local Politics in Russia (New York: Routledge), p. 114.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Mikhail Vinogradov (2007), ‘Gubernatory na peredovom fronte izbiratelnoi kampanii’ Governors at the Frontline of the Election Campaign], Nezavisimaya Gazeta, 14 August, http://www.ng.ru/politics/2007-08-14/3_kartblansh.html.

    Google Scholar 

  29. A. Pravda (ed.) (2005), Leading Russia: Putin in Perspective (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press), p. 175.

    Google Scholar 

  30. National Institute for the Development of Contemporary Ideology (2007), ‘Cadre Reserve: Approaches and Methods’, Material for the “Centre of Social and Conservative Policy” session’, 7 April, http://www.cscp.ru/clauses/52/c/2640.

    Google Scholar 

  31. D. S. Hutcheson, ‘Russia: electoral campaigning in a “managed democracy”’, in D. W. Johnson (2008), Routledge Handbook of Political Management (New York: Routledge), p. 339.

    Google Scholar 

  32. C. Ross (2009), Local Politics and Democratization in Russia (New York: Routledge), p. 182.

    Google Scholar 

  33. M. Grigorev (2008), Final novgorodskogo chikago [Finale for the Novgorod Chicago] (Moscow: Fond issledovaniya problem demokratii).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Aleksei Gromskii (2007), ‘Chto skazal Klebanov?’ [What Did Klebanov Say?], Novye Khroniki, 5 July, http://novchronic.ru/716.htm.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2012 Clementine Fauconnier

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fauconnier, C. (2012). United Russia’s Political Recruitment in the Russian Regions and ‘the Strengthening of the Power Vertical’: The Case of Novgorod Region. In: Jonson, L., White, S. (eds) Waiting for Reform under Putin and Medvedev. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137011206_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics