Abstract
The September 12, 2010 referendum on the constitution brought among other issues, Turkish big business and its social, political, and economic position to the fore. While the referendum pitted the mildly Islamic Justice and Development Party (JDP) government of Tayyip Erdoğan, which sought to change the constitution of 1982, against the secularist state elite and Kemalist middle classes, who saw in the referendum another ploy to erode the power of the secular establishment, there was also much discussion on the position that large capital owners took. The reason their position and their main voluntary organization—the Turkish Industrialists’ and Businessmen’s Association (TÜSİAD)—became a center of attention during the referendum was because of the association’s decision to maintain a neutral stance.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
Arat, Y. 1991. “Politics and Big Business: Janus-Faced Link to the State,” in Strong State and Economic Interest Groups: The Post-1989 Experience, edited by M. Heper. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Bartell, Ernest J., and Leigh A. Payne. 1995. Business and Democracy in Latin America. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Berry, J. M. 2002. “Validity and reliability issues in elite interviewing,” Ps-Political Science & Politics 35 (4): 679–82.
Bianchi, R. 1984. “Interest Group Politics in the Third-World,” Third World Quarterly 8 (2): 507–39.
Buğra, A. 1994. State and Business in Modern Turkey: A Comparative Study. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Buğra, A. 1998. “Class, Culture, and State: An Analysis of Interest Representation by Two Turkish Business Associations,” International Journal of Middle Eastern Studies 30: 521–39.
Burawoy, M. 1998. “The Extended Case Method,” Sociological Theory 16 (1): 4–33.
Cammett, M. 2007. Globalization and Business Politics in Arab North Africa: A Comparative Perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Cardoso, F. H. 1986. “Entrepreneurs and the transition to democracy in Brazil,” in Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Comparative Perspectives, edited by G. O’Donnell, P. Schmitter and L. Whitehead. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Cardoso, Fernando Henrique, and Enzo Faletto. 1979. Dependency and Development in Latin America. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Durand, F. and E. Silva. 1998 Organized Business, Economic Change, and Democracy in Latin America. Coral Gables, FL: North-South Center Press at the University of Miami.
Evans, P. B. 1979. Dependent Development: The Alliance of Multinational, State, and Local Capital in Brazil. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Evans, Peter B., Dietrich Rueschemeyer, Theda Skocpol. 1985. Bringing the State Back in. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
Gerschenkron, Alexander. 1962. Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective: A Book of Essays. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Goldstein, K. 2002. “Getting in the Door: Sampling and Completing Elite Interviews,” Ps-Political Science &Politics 35 (4): 669–72.
Hall, J. A. 1985 Powers and Liberties: The Causes and Consequences of the Rise of the West. Oxford: Blackwell.
Heper, M. 1985. The State Tradition in Turkey. Beverley, North Humberside: Eothen Press.
Hirschman, A. O. 1970. Exit, Voice, and Loyalty; Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Ilkin, S. and Tekeli, I. 1982. Uygulamaya Gecerken Turkiye’ de Devletciligin Olusumu, Ankara: Orta Dogu Teknik Universitesi
Insel, A. 1984. La Turquie entre l’ordre et le developpement: elements d’analyse sur le role de l’etat dans le processus de developpement, Paris: L’Harmattan.
Informant 1. 2001. Personal interview, TÜSİAD member, Istanbul.
Informant 2. 2002. Personal interview, TÜSİAD member, Istanbul.
Informant 3. 2002. Personal interview, TÜSİAD member, Istanbul.
Kaya, I. 2007.“Identity Politics: The Struggle for Recognition or Hegemony?” East European Politics and Societies, 21: 704–25.
Keyder, Çaglar. 1987. State and Class in Turkey: A Study in Capitalist Development. London and New York: Verso.
Kingstone, P. R. 1998. “Corporatism, Neoliberalism, and the Failed Revolt of Big Business: Lessons from the Case of IEDI,” Journal of Lnteramerican Studies and World Affairs 40 (4): 73–95.
Koker, L. 1999. Modernlesme, Kemalizm ve Demokrasi, 4th ed. Istanbul: Đletisim Yayinlari.
Mahoney, J. 2007. “Qualitative Methodology and Comparative Politics,” Comparative Political Studies 40 (2): 122–44.
Mann, M. 1997. “Has Globalization Ended the Rise and Rise of the Nation-State?” Review Of International Political Economy 4: 472–96.
Marshall, T. H. 1950. Citizenship and Social Class. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Marx, Karl, and Friedrich Engels. 2002. The Communist Manifesto. London and New York: Penguin Books.
Moore, Barrington. 1967. Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy: Lord and Peasant in the Making of the Modern World. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
Moore, P. 2004. Doing Business in the Middle East: Politics and Economic Crisis in Jordan and Kuwait. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mouzelis, N. P. 1986. Politics in the Semi-periphery: Early Parliamentarism and Late Lndustrialization in the Balkans and Latin America. London: Macmillan.
Mouzelis, N. P. 1995. Sociological Theory: What Went Wrong? Diagnosis and Remedies. London and New York: Routledge.
O’Donnell, Guillermo A. 1979. Modernization and Bureaucratic-Authoritarianism; Studies in South American Politics. Berkeley: Institute of International Studies University of California.
Olson, M. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods andthe Theory of Groups. Cambridge and London: Harvard University Press.
Öniş, Ziya and Umut Turem. 2002. “Entrepreneurs, democracy, and citizenship in Turkey,” Comparative Politics 34: 439–56.
Poulantzas, Nicos Ar. 1971. Pouvoir politique et classes sociales. Paris: F. Maspero.
Rueschemeyer, D., Huber Stephens, E. and Stephens, J. D. 1992. Capitalist development and democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Schneider, B. R. 2002. “Why is Mexican Business so Organized?” Latin American Research Review Vol. 37, No. 1: 77–118.
Schneider, B. R. 2004. Business Politics and the State in Twentieth-century Latin America. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
Skocpol, Theda. 1979. States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia, and China. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
Silva, E. 1996. “From Dictatorship to Democracy—The Business-State Nexus in Chile’s Economic Transformation, 1975–1994,” Comparative Politics 28: 299–320.
Silva, E. and Francisco Durand. 1998. “Organized Business and Politics in Latin America,” in Durand and Silva (eds.) Organized Business, Economic Change, and Democracy in Latin America. Coral Gables, FL: North-South Center Press at the University of Miami.
Sonmez, M. 1988. Turkiye’ de holdingler: kirk haramiler. Istanbul: Arkadas Yayinevi.
Yavuz, D. 2006. “Business as Usual? Turkish Industrialists, the State and Democratization.” PhD Thesis. McGill University: Canada.
Yavuz, D. 2010. “Testing Large Business’s Commitment to Democracy: Business Organizations and the Secular—Muslim Conflict in Turkey,” Government and Opposition 45 (1), 73–92.
Yavuz, E. 1994. “The State of the Industrial Workforce, 1923–1940,” in D. Quataert and E. Zürcher (eds.) Workers andthe Working Class in the Ottoman Empire and the Turkish Republic 1839–1950. London and New York: Tauris Academic Studies.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2012 Berna Turam
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Yavuz, D. (2012). Conflict, Democratic Reform, and Big Business: Factors Shaping the Economic Elite’s Position for Change. In: Turam, B. (eds) Secular State and Religious Society. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137010643_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137010643_8
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-34165-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-01064-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)