Skip to main content

Artful Sport: Violence, Dismemberment, and Games in Titus Andronicus, Cymbeline, and Doctor Faustus

  • Chapter
Shakespeare and the Materiality of Performance
  • 169 Accesses

Abstract

One of the most bizarre episodes of dismemberment in early modern theatre occurs in The Tragical Reign of Selimus. When Acomat tortures Bajazet’s ambassador Aga, he “[p]uls out his eyes” and “cut[s] of[f] his hands,” 1 as the stage directions tell us. He then commands Aga,

[Aco.] Now in that sort go tell thy Fmperour [sic]

That if himselfe had but bene in thy place,

I would haue vs’d him crueller then thee:

Here take thy hands: I know thou lou’st them wel.

Opens his bosome, and puts them in.

Which hand is this? right? or left? canst thou tell?

Aga. I know not which it is, but tis my hand. (F3r; lines 1432–38)

The word bosom, in early modern usage, referred not only to a part of the body but also to the “part of the dress which covers the breast; also the space included between the breast and its covering,” and it was specifically “[c]onsidered as the receptacle for money or letters, formerly answering to modern use of ‘pocket.’” 2 This grotesque bit of stage business underscores Aga’s loss of agency: the ambassador’s hands no longer carry out Bajazet’s will but are themselves objects to be carried. The literalness of this exchange is accentuated when Aga subsequently returns home. He calls upon Bajazet and his lords to “witnesse” his bodily mutilation, then says, “VVitnesse the present that he sends to thee, / Open my bosome, there you shall it see” (F3v; lines 1476–77, 1485–86).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The Tragical Reign of Selimus, 1594, ed. W[illy] Bang, Malone Society Reprints (London: Malone Society/Chiswick Press, 1909), F2v, F3r; lines 1415, 1431. Quotations from this facsimile of the 1594 quarto have been cross-checked against T. G., The tragedy of Selimus Emperour of the Turkes (London, 1638).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Christopher Marlowe, The tragicall history of the life and death of Doctor Faustus (London, 1616), B-text, G2v; David Bevington and Eric Rasmussen, eds., Doctor Faustus A- and B-texts (1604, 1616): Christopher Marlowe and His Collaborator and Revisers, The Revels Plays (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1993), 4.6.125.

    Google Scholar 

  3. See Alan C. Dessen, Titus Andronicus, Shakespeare in Performance (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1989);

    Google Scholar 

  4. and G. Harold Metz, “Stage History of Titus Andronicus,” Shakespeare Quarterly 28 (1977): 154–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. See, for example, Stephen Greenblatt et al., eds., The Norton Shakespeare (New York: Norton, 1997), based on Stanley Wells and Gary Taylor’s Oxford text. The earlier Oxford version edited by Eugene Waith changes “these things” to “this” but keeps “teeth.” The Riverside and the Arden 3 editions cut the third line after “employed” but retain “teeth.”

    Google Scholar 

  6. Eugene M. Waith, ed., Titus Andronicus, The Oxford Shakespeare (Oxford: Clarendon, 1984);

    Google Scholar 

  7. G. Blakemore Evans et al., eds., The Riverside Shakespeare, 2nd ed. (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1997);

    Google Scholar 

  8. and Jonathan Bate, ed., Titus Andronicus, The Arden Shakespeare, 3rd series (London: Routledge, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  9. For other discussions of the hand-in-teeth moment, see Alan C. Dessen, Recovering Shakespeare’s Theatrical Vocabulary (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995), 94–95, 242n5;

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. and Heather James, Shakespeare’s Troy: Drama, Politics, and the Translation of Empire (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997), 74–76.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. See, for example, Katherine Rowe, Dead Hands: Fictions of Agency, Renaissance to Modern (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1999), 52–85;

    Google Scholar 

  12. Michael Neill, “‘Amphitheatres in the Body’: Playing with Hands on the Shakespearian Stage,” Shakespeare Survey 48 (1995): 23–50;

    Google Scholar 

  13. Heather James, “Cultural Disintegration in Titus Andronicus : Mutilating Titus, Vergil and Rome,” in Violence in Drama, ed. James Redmond (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991), 123–40;

    Google Scholar 

  14. and Gillian Murray Kendall, “‘Lend Me Thy Hand’: Metaphor and Mayhem in Titus Andronicus,” Shakespeare Quarterly 40 (1989): 299–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Homer Swander, “No Exit for a Dead Body: What to Do with a Scripted Corpse?” Journal of Dramatic Theory and Criticism 5 (1991): 139.

    Google Scholar 

  16. See also Mariko Ichikawa, “What to Do with a Corpse? Physical Reality and the Fictional World in the Shakespearean Theatre,” Theatre Research International 29 (2004): 201–15. Early modern productions apparently had similar constraints. According to one writer, a pre-Interregnum performance generated much laughter when one actor “brandisht his Sword & made his Exit; ne’re minding to bring off his dead men; which they perceiving, crauld into the Tyreing house, at which Fowler grew angry, and told ’em, Dogs you should have laine there till you had been fetcht off; and so they crauld out again, which gave the People such an occasion of Laughter, they cry’d that again[,] that again, that again.” John Tatham, Knavery in all trades, or, The coffee-house a comedy: as it was acted in the Christmas holidays by several apprentices with great applause (London, 1664), E1r.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Susan Dwyer Amussen, “Punishment, Discipline, and Power: The Social Meanings of Violence in Early Modern England,” Journal of British Studies 34 (1995): 9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. See J. H. Baker, “Criminal Courts and Procedure at Common Law 1550–1800,” in Crime in England, 1550–1800, ed. J. S. Cockburn (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1977), 15–48;

    Google Scholar 

  19. and J. A. Sharpe, Judicial Punishment in England (London: Faber and Faber, 1990), 18–49.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Clare Williams, ed. and trans., Thomas Platter’s Travels in England, 1599 (London: Jonathan Cape, 1937), 155.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Peter Lake and Michael Questier, “Agency, Appropriation and Rhetoric under the Gallows: Puritans, Romanists and the State in Early Modern England,” Past and Present 153 (1996): 77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. On funeral practices, see Michael Neill, Issues of Death: Mortality and Identity in English Renaissance Tragedy (Oxford: Clarendon, 1997).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  23. William Harrison, The Description of England, ed. Georges Edelen (London, 1587; Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1968), 187.

    Google Scholar 

  24. John H. Langbein, Prosecuting Crime in the Renaissance: England, Germany, France (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1974), 47.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  25. Malcolm Gaskill, Crime and Mentalities in Early Modern England (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000), 222.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  26. The horrible murther of a young boy of three yeres of age, whose sister had her tongue cut out and how it pleased God to reueale the offendors, by giuing speech to the tongueles childe … (London, 1606), B2r. Tongues are repeatedly linked with the revelation of murder, an association that extends to theatre, too, as we saw in Titus Andronicus and The Spanish Tragedy. On tongues, see Carla Mazzio, “Sins of the Tongue,” in The Body in Parts: Fantasies of Corporeality in Early Modern Europe, ed. David Hillman and Carla Mazzio (New York: Routledge, 1997), 53–79.

    Google Scholar 

  27. On lay investigators, see Lorna Hutson, “Rethinking the ‘Spectacle of the Scaffold’: Juridical Epistemologies and English Revenge Tragedy,” Representations 89 (2005): 30–58. On “searchers,” see Gaskill, Crime and Mentalities, 254–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Translations in Peter Meredith and John E. Tailby, eds., The Staging of Religious Drama in Europe in the Later Middle Ages: Texts and Documents in English Translation (Kalamazoo, MI: Medieval Institute, 1983), 102–3, 105.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Véronique Plesch, “Notes for the Staging of a Late Medieval Passion Play,” in Material Culture and Medieval Drama, ed. Clifford Davidson (Kalamazoo, MI: Medieval Institute, 1999), 80.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Philip Massinger and Thomas Dekker, T he virgin martir a tragedie. As it hath bin diuers times publickely acted with great applause, by the seruants of his Maiesties Reuels (London, 1622), K2v; John Fletcher and Philip Massinger, Sir John Van Olden Barnavelt, ed. T. H. Howard-Hill, Malone Society Reprints (1619; London: Malone Society, 1980), 94; and Gervase Markham and William Sampson, The true tragedy of Herod and Antipater with the death of faire Marriam … publiquely acted (with great applause) at the Red Bull, by the Company of his Maiesties Reuels (London, 1622), L4r. See also the beheading of Isabella in John Marston and William Barksted, The insatiate countesse A tragedie: acted at VVhite-Fryers (London, 1613), I2r.

    Google Scholar 

  31. John Spalding Gatton, “‘There must be blood’: Mutilation and Martyrdom on the Medieval Stage,” in Violence in Drama, ed. James Redmond (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991), 86.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Quoted in Andrew Gurr, The Shakespearean Stage, 1574–1642, 3rd ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992), 184.

    Google Scholar 

  33. “The Croxton Play of the Sacrament,” in Medieval Drama: An Anthology, ed. Greg Walker (Oxford: Blackwell, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Eric Bentley, The Life of Drama (New York: Atheneum, 1964), 158.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Jonathan Sawday, The Body Emblazoned: Dissection and the Human Body in Renaissance Culture (New York: Routledge, 1995), 42.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Frances Teague, Shakespeare’s Speaking Properties (Lewisburg, PA: Bucknell University Press, 1991), 17–18.

    Google Scholar 

  37. For further discussion of props, see Andrew Sofer’s excellent study, The Stage Life of Props (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  38. On beggary and theatre, see William C. Carroll, Fat King, Lean Beggar: Representations of Poverty in the Age of Shakespeare (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1996);

    Google Scholar 

  39. and Paola Pugliatti, Beggary and the Theatre in Early Modern England (Aldershot, UK: Ashgate, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Jean-Christophe Agnew, Worlds Apart: The Market and the Theater in Anglo-American Thought, 1550–1750 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  41. On laughter and tears in Titus Andronicus, see Matthew Steggle, Laughing and Weeping in Early Modern Theatres (Aldershot, UK: Ashgate, 2007), 128–31.

    Google Scholar 

  42. R. A. Foakes, ed., Henslowe’s Diary, 2nd ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002), 320.

    Google Scholar 

  43. See Philip H. Highfill Jr., Kalman A. Burnim, and Edward A. Langhans, A Biographical Dictionary of Actors, Actresses, Musicians, Dancers, Managers & Other Stage Personnel in London, 1660–1800 (Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1973–93), 14:433. The account from the Universal Journal is dated December 11, 1723, shortly after the show initially premiered on November 26.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Alan C. Dessen and Leslie Thomson, A Dictionary of Stage Directions in English Drama, 1580–1642 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999), 219. For an interesting exception, see Fletcher and Massinger, Sir John Van Olden Barnavelt, 94, where an onstage decapitation is marked only by a long dash.

    Google Scholar 

  45. David Underdown, “Regional Cultures? Local Variation in Popular Culture during the Early Modern Period,” in Popular Culture in England, c. 1500–1850, ed. Tim Harris (New York: St. Martin’s, 1995), 37–39.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Ronald Hutton, The Stations of the Sun: A History of the Ritual Year in Britain (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996), 154.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  47. Arthur Freeman, “The ‘Tapster Manuscript’: An Analogue of Shakespeare’s Henry the Fourth Part One,” English Manuscript Studies, 1100–1700 6 (1997): 98; ellipses and brackets in Freeman’s transcription.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Note, too, that the horse-courser’s group is led by Robin the clown, as indicated in the original quarto’s speech tags and stage directions. On the clown’s adoption of the Vice’s dramaturgical techniques, including his instigation of games, see David Wiles, Shakespeare’s Clown: Actor and Text in the Elizabethan Playhouse (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987), 1–10.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  49. Alfred Harbage, Annals of English Drama, 975–1700, 3rd ed., rev. S. Schoenbaum and Sylvia Stoler Wagonheim (New York: Routledge, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  50. On baiting in relation to discourses of human and beast, see Erica Fudge, Brutal Reasoning: Animals, Rationality, and Humanity in Early Modern England (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2006);

    Google Scholar 

  51. Fudge, Perceiving Animals: Humans and Beasts in Early Modern English Culture (New York: St. Martin’s, 2000);

    Google Scholar 

  52. and Fudge , Ruth Gilbert, and S. J. Wiseman, eds., At the Borders of the Human: Beasts, Bodies and Natural Philosophy in the Early Modern Period (New York: St. Martin’s, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Hutton, Stations of the Sun, 152. Carlisle hosted football matches as well; see Records of Early English Drama: Cumberland, Westmorland, Gloucestershire, ed. Audrey Douglas and Peter Greenfield (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1986), 25.

    Google Scholar 

  54. For related arguments about the social functions of sport, see Gregory M. Colón Semenza, Sport, Politics, and Literature in the English Renaissance (Newark: University of Delaware Press, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  55. See Martin Ingram, “Ridings, Rough Music and the ‘Reform of Popular Culture’ in Early Modern England,” Past and Present 105 (1984): 79–113; and Sharpe, Judicial Punishment in England, 18–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Amussen, “Punishment, Discipline, and Power,” 12. For other accounts of this incident, see Lake and Questier, “Agency, Appropriation and Rhetoric,” 102; and David Underdown, Fire from Heaven: Life in an English Town in the Seventeenth Century (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1992), 197–98.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Homer, The Iliad, trans. Robert Fagles with introduction and notes by Bernard Knox (New York: Viking Penguin, 1990), 11.166–70.

    Google Scholar 

  58. John Webster, The white diuel, or, The tragedy of Paulo Giordano Vrsini, Duke of Brachiano with the life and death of Vittoria Corombona the famous Venetian curtizan. Acted by the Queenes Maiesties Seruants (London, 1612), G2v; John Webster, The White Devil, ed. Christina Luckyj, The New Mermaids (London: A&C Black; New York: Norton, 1996), 4.2.136–37.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Patricia Palmer, “‘An headlesse Ladie’ and ‘a horses loade of heades’: Writing the Beheading,” Renaissance Quarterly 60 (2007): 25–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. See Giles E. Dawson, “London’s Bull-Baiting and Bear-Baiting Arena in 1562,” Shakespeare Quarterly 15 (1964): 98–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. For an overview of baiting, see Oscar Brownstein, “The Popularity of Baiting in England before 1600: A Study in Social and Theatrical History,” Educational Theatre Journal 21 (1969): 237–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. On baiting and playing, see Brownstein, “Why Didn’t Burbage Lease the Beargarden? A Conjecture in Comparative Architecture,” in The First Public Playhouse: The Theatre in Shoreditch, 1576–1598, ed. Herbert Berry (Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 1979), 81–96.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Brownstein, A “Popularity of Baiting,” 240–44; S. P. Cerasano, “The Master of the Bears in Art and Enterprise,” Medieval and Renaissance Drama in England 5 (1991): 195–209;

    Google Scholar 

  64. and Andrew Gurr, “Bears and Players: Philip Henslowe’s Double Acts,” Shakespeare Bulletin 22, no. 4 (2004): 31–41.

    Google Scholar 

  65. See, for instance, Stephen Dickey, “Shakespeare’s Mastiff Comedy,” Shakespeare Quarterly 42 (1991): 255–75;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Jason Scott-Warren, “When Theaters Were Bear-Gardens; or, What’s at Stake in the Comedy of Humors,” Shakespeare Quarterly 54 (2003): 63–82;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Rebecca Ann Bach, “Bearbaiting, Dominion, and Colonialism,” in Race, Ethnicity, and Power in the Renaissance, ed. Joyce Green MacDonald (Madison, NJ: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, 1997), 19–35;

    Google Scholar 

  68. and Tobias Hug, “‘You should go to Hockley in the Hole, and to Marybone, child, to learn valour’: On the Social Logic of Animal Baiting in Early Modern London,” Renaissance Journal 2, no. 1 (2004): 17–26.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Andreas Höfele, Stage, Stake, and Scaffold: Humans and Animals in Shakespeare’s Theatre (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011), unfortunately appeared too late to be taken into account here.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  70. From an early modern advertisement for a baiting, reprinted in W. W. Greg, ed., Henslowe Papers: Being Documents Supplementary to Henslowe’s Diary (London: A. H. Bullen, 1907), 106.

    Google Scholar 

  71. John Webster, The tragedy of the Dutchesse of Malfy As it was presented priuatly, at the Black-Friers; and publiquely at the Globe, by the Kings Maiesties Seruants … (London, 1623), I2v; John Webster, The Duchess of Malfi, 2nd ed., ed. John Russell Brown, The Revels Plays (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2009), 4.1.111–15.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2012 Erika T. Lin

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lin, E.T. (2012). Artful Sport: Violence, Dismemberment, and Games in Titus Andronicus, Cymbeline, and Doctor Faustus. In: Shakespeare and the Materiality of Performance. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137006509_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics