Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

The Material Letter in Early Modern England pp 1–29Cite as

Palgrave Macmillan

Introduction

  • Chapter

  • 277 Accesses

Part of the book series: Early Modern Literature in History ((EMLH))

Abstract

On the morning of 23 September 1601 Secretary of State Robert Cecil sent a brief letter to the soldier Sir Francis Darcy, a letter that never in fact arrived:

Sr Francys Darcy. I haue receaued this inclosed from the court this morninge, wch I haue thought good to send to you with speed to be deliuered by you accordinge as you are directed: and soe for this tyme I committ you to God. from London this 23 of September 1601

your verie lovinge freind

Ro Cecyll 1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Mark Bland (2004) ‘Italian Paper in Early Seventeenth-Century England’, in R. Graziaplena (ed.) Paper as a Medium of Cultural Heritage: Archaeology and Conservation (Rome: Istituto centrale per la patologia del libro), pp.243-55.

    Google Scholar 

  2. James Daybell (1999) ‘Women’s Letters and Letter-Writing in England, 1540–1603: An Introduction to the Issues of Authorship and Construction’, Shakespeare Studies, 27, 161–86.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Mark Brayshay, Philip Harrison, and Brian Chalkley (1998) ‘Knowledge, Nationhood and Governance: The Speed of the Royal Post in Early-Modern England’, Journal of Historical Geography, 24, 265–88. I am grateful to Professor Brayshay for discussion on the postal endorsements in this letter.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. For a classic account of epistolarity see, Janet Gurkin Altman (1982) Epistolarity: Approaches to a Form (Columbus, OH: Ohio State UP).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Daybell (2005) ‘Recent Studies in Renaissance Letters: The Sixteenth Century’, ELR, 35/2, 331–62; idem (2006) ‘Recent Studies in Renaissance Letters: The Seventeenth Century’, ELR, 36/1, 135–70. Recent linguistic approaches include Graham Williams (2009) ‘Pragmatic Readings in the Letters of Joan and Maria Thynne, 1575–1611, With Diplomatic Transcriptions of Their Correspondence’ (Ph.D. thesis, University of Glasgow).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Roger Chartier (1997) ‘Secrétaires for the People? Model Letters of the Ancien Régime: Between Court Literature and Popular Chapbooks’, in Roger Chartier (ed.) Correspondence: Models of Letter-Writing From the Middle Ages to the Nineteenth Century (Cambridge: Polity Press), pp.59-111.

    Google Scholar 

  7. David M. Bergeron (1999) King fames & Letters of Homoerotic Desire (Iowa City: U of Iowa P)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Alan Bray (1990) ‘Homosexuality and the Signs of Male Friendship in Elizabethan England’, History Workshop Journal, 29 (1990), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. See also, T. Van Houdt, et al. (eds) (2002) Self-Presentation and Social Identification: The Rhetoric and Pragmatics of Letter Writing in Early Modern Times (Leuven: Leuven UP).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Daybell (2006) Women Letter-Writers in Tudor England (Oxford: OUP)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Daybell (ed.) Early Modern Women’s Letter Writing (Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2001)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jane Couchman and Ann Crabb (eds) (2005) Women’s Letters Across Europe, 1400–1700: Form and Persuasion (Aldershot: Ashgate).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Giora Sternberg (2009) ‘Epistolary Ceremonial: Corresponding Status at the Time of Louis XIV’, P&P, 204/1, 33–88 (esp. pp.66-74).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Tanselle, ‘Textual Criticism’, p.83. Heather Hirshfield (2001) ‘Early Modern Collaboration and Theories of Authorship’, PMLA, 116/3, 609–22.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Heidi Brayman Hackel (2005) Reading Material in Early Modem England: Print, Gender, and Literacy (Cambridge: CUP)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Jennifer Anderson and Elizabeth Sauer (eds) (2002) Books and Their Readers in Early Modern England: Material Studies (Philadelphia: U Pennsylvania P).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Jason Scott-Warren (2001) Sir John Harington and the Book as Gift (Oxford: OUP).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Raffaella Sarti (trans. Allan Cameron) (2002) Europe at Home: Family and Material Culture, 1500–1800 (New Haven: Yale UP).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ann Rosalind Jones and Peter Stallybrass (2000) Renaissance Clothing and the Materials of Memory (Cambridge: CUP), p.11.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Julian Yates (2002) ‘Towards a Theory of Agentive Drift: Or, A Particular Fondness for Oranges in 1597’, Parallax, 22, 47–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Rachel P. Garrard (1980) ‘English Probate Inventories and their Use in Studying the Significance of the Domestic Interior. 1570–1700’, in Ad Van Der Woude and Anton Schuurman (eds) Probate Inventories: A New Source for the Historical Studies of Wealth, Material Culture and Agricultural Development (Utrecht: HES Publishers), pp.55-82.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Margaret Spufford (1990) ‘The Limitations of Probate Inventory’, in John Chartres and David Hey (eds) English Rural Society, 1500–1800: Essays in Honour of Joan Thirsk (Cambridge: CUP), pp. 139–74.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Philip Beale (2005) England’s Mail: Two Millennia of Letter-Writing (Stroud: Tempus)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Mark Brayshay, Philip Harrison and Brian Chalkley (1998) ‘Knowledge, Nationhood and Governance: The Speed of the Royal Post in Early-Modern England’, Journal of Historical Geography, 24/3, 265–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lena Cowen Orlin (2007) Locating Privacy in Tudor London (Oxford: OUP)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Linda Pollock (1993) ‘Living on the Stage of the World: The Concept of Privacy Among the Elite of Early Modern England’, in Adrian Wilson (ed.) Rethinking Social History: English Society 1570–1920 and Its Interpretation (Manchester: Manchester UP), pp.78-96 (pp.79-80).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Claudio Guillen (1986) ‘Notes Toward the Study of the Renaissance Letter’, in Barbara Kiefer Lewalski (ed.) Renaissance Genres: Essays on Theory, History and Interpretation (Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP), pp.70-101.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Judith Rice Henderson (1993) ‘On Reading the Rhetoric of the Renaissance Letter’, in Heinrich F. Plett (ed.) Renaissance-Rhetorik Renaissance Rhetoric (Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter), pp.143-62 (p.149).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Peter C. Sutton, et al. (2003) Love Letters: Dutch Genre Paintings in the Age of Vermeer (Greenwich, CT and Dublin: Frances Lincoln).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Hilary Jenkinson (1922) ‘Elizabethan Handwriting: A Preliminary Sketch’, The Library, 3/1, 1–34 and plates (p.34). Cf. Beal, Dictionary, p.188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Jenkinson (1926) ‘Notes on the Study of English Punctuation of the Sixteenth Century’, RES, 2/6, 152–8 (p.156).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Plymouth University, USA

    James Daybell

Authors
  1. James Daybell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Copyright information

© 2012 James Daybell

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Daybell, J. (2012). Introduction. In: The Material Letter in Early Modern England. Early Modern Literature in History. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137006066_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation