• Karoline Van den Brande
  • Hans Bruyninckx
  • Sander Happaerts


Since the beginning of the 1970s, the international community has increasingly realized the limits of continued economic growth without concerns for social and environmental objectives. It became clear that the world’s development trajectory was causing large-scale environmental degradation, irreversible loss of natural resources, social injustice between and within societies, rapid depletion of certain energy sources, and even troubling changes to the Earth’s climate. The assumption gained ground that from an economic, social and ecological point of view current development patterns could not be custained


Sustainable Development United Nations Transnational Network Policy Framing Sustainable Development Policy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aldecoa, Francisco and Michael Keating. 1999. Special Issue: Paradiplomacy in Action. The Foreign Relations of Subnational Governments. Regional and Federal Studies 9, edited by J. Loughlin. London: Frank Cass & Co.Google Scholar
  2. Bache, Ian and Matthew Flinders, eds. 2005. Multi-level Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Baker, Susan and Katarina Eckerberg. 2008a. Introduction: in pursuit of sustainable development at the sub-national level: The ‘new’ governance agenda. In In Pursuit of Sustainable Development. New governance practices at the sub-national level in Europe, edited by S. Baker and K. Eckerberg. London & New York: Routledge/ECPR Studies in European polítical Science.Google Scholar
  4. —. eds. 2008b. In Pursuit of Sustainable Development. New governance practices at the sub-national level in Europe. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Baker, Susan, Maria Kousis, Dick Richardson and Stephen Young. 1997. Introduction. The theory and practice of sustainable development in EU perspective. In The Politics of Sustainable Development. Theory, policy and practice within the European Union, edited by S. Baker, M. Kousis, D. Richardson and S. Young. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Bennett, Colin J. 1988. Different processes, one result: The convergence of data protection policy in Europe and the United States. Governance 1 (4): 415–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blatter, Joachim, Matthias Kreutzer, Michaela Rentl and Jan Thiele. 2008. The foreign relations of European regions: Competences and strategies. West European Politics 31 (3): 464–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blühdorn, Ingolfur and Ian Welsh. 2007. Eco-politics beyond the paradigm of sustain-ability: A conceptual framework and research agenda. Environmental Politics 16 (2): 185–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bomberg, Elizabeth. 2004. Adapting form to function? From economic to sustain-able development governance in the European Union. In Governance for Sustainable Development. The challenge of adapting form to function, edited by W. M. Lafferty. Cheltenham, UK & Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  10. Bomberg, Elizabeth and John Peterson. 1998. European union decision making: The role of sub-national authorities. polítical Studies XLVI: 219–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Börzel, Tanja A. 2002. States and Regions in the European Union. Institutional adaptation in Germany and Spain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Bruyninckx, Hans. 2006. Sustainable development: The institutionalization of a contested policy concept. In Palgrave Advances in International Environmental Politics, edited by M. M. Betsill, K. Hochstetler and D. Stevis. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  13. Bursens, Peter and Sarah Helsen. 2001. Implementatie van Europese wetgeving in nationale systemen. De Belgische casus bekeken door een multi-level governance bril. Res Publica. Themanummer: De consequenties van multi-level governance. XLIII (2001/1): 59–79.Google Scholar
  14. Daviter, Falk. 2007. Policy framing in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy 14 (4): 654–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Delmas, Magali A. and Oran R. Young. 2009. Introduction: New perspectives on governance for sustainable development. In Governance for the Environment. New perspectives, edited by M. A. Delmas and O. R. Young. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dovers, Stephen R. 1995. A framework for scaling and framing policy problems in sustainability. Ecological Economics 12: 93–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. —. 1997. Sustainability: Demands on policy. Journal of Public Policy 16 (3): 303–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Elliott, Lorraine. 1998. From Stockholm to Rio. In The Global Politics of the Environment, edited by L. Elliott. London: Macmillan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Geeraerts, Kristof, Peter Bursens and Pieter Leroy. 2004. Rapport Vlaams Internationaal Milieubeleid. Vlaams milieubeleid steekt de grenzen over. De Vlaamse betrokken-heid bij de totstandkoming van Europees en multilateraal milieubeleid. Antwerpen: Universiteit Antwerpen, Steunpunt Milieubeleidswetenschappen.Google Scholar
  20. Happaerts, Sander and Karoline Van den Brande. 2011. Sustainable development and transnational communication: Assessing the international influence on subnational policies. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice 13 (5): 527–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Happaerts, Sander, Karoline Van den Brande and Hans Bruyninckx. 2010. Governance for sustainable development at the inter-subnational level: The case of the Network of Regional Governments for Sustainable Development (nrg4SD). Regional & Federal Studies 20 (1): 127–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. —. 2011. Subnational governments in transnational networks for sustainable development. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 11 (4): 321–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Harrison, Neil E. 2000. Constructing Sustainable Development. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  24. Holzinger, Katharina and Christoph Knill. 2005. Causes and conditions of cross-national policy convergence. Journal of European Public Policy 12 (5): 775–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Holzinger, Katharina, Christoph Knill and Thomas Sommerer. 2008. Environmental policy convergence: The impact of international harmonization, transnational communication, and regulatory competition. International Organization 62: 553–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hooghe, Liesbet. 1995. Subnational mobilisation in the European Union. West European Politics 18 (3): 175–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hooghe, Liesbet and Gary Marks. 1996. ‘Europe with the Regions’: Channels of regional representation in the European Union. The Journal of Federalism 26 (1): 73–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. —. 2001. Multi-level Governance and European Integration Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar
  29. Hooghe, Liesbet, Gary Marks and Arjan H. Schakel. 2008. Special issue: Regional authority in 42 countries, 1950–2006: A measure and five hypotheses. Regional &Federal Studies 18 (2–3).Google Scholar
  30. Jacobs, Michael. 1999. Sustainable development as a contested concept. In Fairness and Futurity. Essays on environmental sustainability and social justice, edited by A. Dobson. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Jeffery, Charlie. 2000. Sub-national mobilization and European integration: Does it make any difference? Journal of Common Market Studies 38 (1): 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jordan, Andrew. 2008. The governance of sustainable development: Taking stock and looking forwards. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 26: 17–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Keating, Michael and Nicola McEwen. 2005. Introduction: Devolution and public policy in comparative perspective. Regional & Federal Studies 15 (4): 413–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kemp, René, Saeed Parto and Robert B. Gibson. 2005. Governance for sustainable development: Moving from theory to practice. International Journal of Sustainable Development 8 (1/2): 12–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kern, Kristine and Tina Löffelsend. 2004. Sustainable development in the Baltic Sea Region. Governance beyond the nation state. Local Environment 9 (5): 451–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lafferty, William M. 1996. The politics of sustainable development: Global norms for national implementation. Environmental Politics 5 (2): 185–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. —. 2004. Introduction: Form and function in governance for sustainable development. In Governance for Sustainable Development. The challenge of adapting form to function, edited by W. M. Lafferty. Cheltenham, UK & Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lafferty, William M. , ed. 2001. Sustainable communities in Europe. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  39. Lafferty, William M. and James Meadowcroft. 2000a. Concluding perspectives. In Implementing Sustainable Development. Strategies and initiatives in high consumption sodeties, edited by W. M. Lafferty and J. Meadowcroft. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. —. , eds. 2000b. Implementing Sustainable Development. Strategies and initiatives in high consumption societies. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Lenschow, Andrea, Duncan Liefferink and Sietske Veenman. 2005. When the birds sing. A framework for analysing domestic factors behind policy convergence. Journal of European Public Policy 12 (5): 797–816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Marks, Gary, Liesbet Hooghe and Arjan H. Schakel. 2008. Measuring regional author-ity. Regional & Federal Studies 18 (2–3): 111–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mazey, Sonia and Jeremy Richardson. 1997. Policy framing: Interest groups and the lead up to 1996 inter-governmental conference. West European Politics 20 (3): 111–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Meadowcroft, James. 1997. Planning for sustainable development: Insights from the literatures of polítical science. European Journal of polítical Research 31: 427–54.Google Scholar
  45. —. 2007. National sustainable development strategies: Features, challenges and reflexivity. European Environment 17: 152–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. —. 2008. Who is in charge here? Governance for sustainable development in a complex world. In Governance for Sustainable Development. Coping with ambivalence, uncertainty and distributed power, edited by J. Newig, J.-P. Voß and J. Monstadt. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  47. Michelmann, Hans and Panayotis Soldatos, eds. 1990. Federalism and International Relations. The role of subnational units. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Morata, Francesc. 2002. The role of the regions in the local/global GSD axis. In Governance for Sustainable Development, edited by CADS. Barcelona: Generalitat de Catalunya, Conseil Assessor per al Desenvolupament Sostenible.Google Scholar
  49. Niestroy, Ingeborg. 2005. Sustaining Sustainability. A benchmark study on national strategies towards sustainable development and the impact of councils in nine EU member states. EEAC series, Background study n° 2. Utrecht: Lemma.Google Scholar
  50. O’Toole, Laurence J., Jr. 2004. Implementation theory and the challenge of sustain-able development: The transformative role of learning. In Governance for Sustainable Development. The challenge of adapting form to function, edited by W. M. Lafferty. Cheltenham, UK & Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  51. OECD. 2002. Governance for Sustainable Development. Five OECD case studies. Paris: OECD Publications.Google Scholar
  52. Pallemaerts, Marc. 2003. International law and sustainable development in and after Johannesburg. In Making Globalisation Sustainable? The Johannesburg Summit on sustainable development and beyond, edited by E. Nierynck, A. Vanoverschelde, T. Bauler, E. Zaccai, L. Hens and M. Pallemaerts. Brussels: VUB Brussels University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Paquin, Stéphane. 2004. Paradiplomatie et relations internationales: théorie des stratégies internationales des régions face à la mondialisation. Vol. 3, Régionalisme et fédéralisme. Bruxelles: PIE-Lang.Google Scholar
  54. Peters, B. Guy and John A. Hoornbeek. 2005. The problem of policy problems. In Designing Government. From instruments to governance, edited by P. Eliadis, M. M. Hill and M. Howlett. Montreal & Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Pierre, Jon and B. Guy Peters. 2000. Governance, Politics and the State. Houndmills & London: Macmillan Press Ltd.Google Scholar
  56. Rhodes, R. A. W. 1996. The new governance: Governing without government. polítical Studies XLIV: 652–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Rosenau, James N. 2005. Strong demand, huge supply: Governance in an emerging epoch. In Multi-level Governance, edited by I. Bache and M. Flinders. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Schön, Donald A. and Martin Rein. 1994. Frame Reflection. Toward the resolution of intractable policy controversies. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  59. Sneddon, Chris, Richard B. Howarth and Richard B. Norgaard. 2006. Sustainable development in a post-Brundtland world. Ecological Economics 57: 253–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Steurer, Reinhard and André Martinuzzi. 2005. Towards a new pattern of strategy formation in the public sector: First experiences with national strategies for sustainable development in Europe. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 23: 455–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Stoker, Gerry. 1998. Governance as theory: Five propositions. International Social Science 50 (155): 17–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Swanson, Darren and Lásslo Pintér. 2007. Governance structures for national sustain-able development strategies. In Institutionalising Sustainable Development, edited by OECD. Paris: OECD Publications.Google Scholar
  63. United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED). 1992a. Agenda 21: Programme of action for sustainable development. United Nations Department of Public Information.Google Scholar
  64. —. 1992b. The Rio Declaration on Environment and Development. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
  65. Van den Brande, Karoline, Sander Happaerts and Hans Bruyninckx. 2008. The Role of the Subnational Level of Government in Decision-making for Sustainable Development. A multi-level governance perspective. Working paper n° 4. Leuven: Steunpunt Duurzame Ontwikkeling.Google Scholar
  66. —. 2011. Multi-level interactions in a sustainable development context. Different routes for Flanders to decision-making in the UN Commission on sustainable development. Environmental Policy and Governance 21 (1): 70–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Weyand, Sabine. 1997. Inter-regional associations and the European integration process. In The Regional Dimension of the European Union. Towards a third level in Europe?, edited by C. Jeffery. London: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
  68. World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED). 1987. Our Common Future. New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  69. Zaccai, Edwin. 2002. Le développement durable. Dynamique et constitution d’un projet. Bruxelles, Bern, Berlin, Frankfurt/M, New York, Oxford & Wien: P.I.E.-Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Karoline Van den Brande, Hans Bruyninckx and Sander Happaerts 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Karoline Van den Brande
  • Hans Bruyninckx
  • Sander Happaerts

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations