Skip to main content

Technology Design as Experimental Ethics

  • Chapter
Ethics on the Laboratory Floor

Abstract

Doing ethics of technology has become a complicated activity following the developments that have taken place in the philosophy of technology over the last few decades. Contemporary approaches, such as actor-network theory and postphenomenology, have argued convincingly that we need to blur the boundaries between human beings and technological artefacts. While Don Ihde has shown that human relations with the world are fundamentally mediated by technologies (Ihde 1990), Bruno Latour claims that we need to give up the separation we make between human and non-human beings (Latour 1993). In the meantime, according to various authors, even the field of morality has become a hybrid affair. Moral actions and decisions of human beings are fundamentally mediated by technologies, like turnstiles that intervene in fare-dodging in the subway and antenatal diagnostic technologies that inform moral decisions about abortion (Verbeek 2011).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Achterhuis, H. (1995) ‘De moralisering van de apparaten’, Socialisme en Democratie, 52(1): 3–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berdichewsky, D. and Neuenschwander, E. (1999) ‘Toward an Ethics of Persuasive Technology’, Communications of the ACM, 42(5): 51–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouma, J.T., Voorbij, A. I. M., and Poelman, W. A. (2009) ‘The Influence of Changes in the Physical and Technical Design on Social Interactions in a Cohousing Community’, in Durmisevic, E. (ed.) Lifecycle Design of Buildings, Systems and Materials (Enschede: International Council for Building Research Studies and Documentation (CIB) and the University of Twente).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorrestijn, S. (2012) ‘The Design of our Own Lives’, dissertation (University of Twente).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1997a) ‘What is Enlightenment?’, in Rabinow, P. (ed.) M. Foucault, Ethics: Subjectivity and Truth (New York: The New Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (2010) The Government of Self and Others: Lectures at the Collège de France 1982–1983, Davidson, A. I. (ed.) translated by G. Burchell (New York: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1971) ‘The Origin of the Work of Art’, in Anderson, J.M. and Freund, E. H. (eds) Poetry, Language, Thought (New York: Harper & Row).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hottois, G. (1996) Entre symboles et technosciences. Un itinéraire philosophique. (Paris: Editions Champ Vallon).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ihde, D. (1990) Technology and the Lifeworld (Bloomington/Minneapolis: Indiana University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1993) We Have Never Been Modern (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Thaler, R. and Sunstein, C. (2008) Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness (New Haven: Yale University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tromp, N., Hekkert, P., and Verbeek, P. P. (2011) ‘Design for Socially Responsible Behavior: A Classification of Influence Based on Intended User Experience’, Design Issues 27(3): 3–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verbeek, P.P. (2005) What Things Do: Philosophical Reflections on Technology, Agency, and Design (University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Verbeek, P.P. (2009) ‘The Moral Relevance of Technological Artifacts’, in Duwell, M. (ed.) Evaluating New Technologies (Dordrecht: Springer).

    Google Scholar 

  • Verbeek, P.P. (2010) ‘Accompanying Technology: Philosophy of Technology after the Ethical Turn’, Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 14(1): 49–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verbeek, P.P. (2011) Moralizing Technology: Understanding and Designing the Morality of Things (Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2013 Peter-Paul Verbeek

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Verbeek, PP. (2013). Technology Design as Experimental Ethics. In: van der Burg, S., Swierstra, T. (eds) Ethics on the Laboratory Floor. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137002938_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics