Technology Design as Experimental Ethics



Doing ethics of technology has become a complicated activity following the developments that have taken place in the philosophy of technology over the last few decades. Contemporary approaches, such as actor-network theory and postphenomenology, have argued convincingly that we need to blur the boundaries between human beings and technological artefacts. While Don Ihde has shown that human relations with the world are fundamentally mediated by technologies (Ihde 1990), Bruno Latour claims that we need to give up the separation we make between human and non-human beings (Latour 1993). In the meantime, according to various authors, even the field of morality has become a hybrid affair. Moral actions and decisions of human beings are fundamentally mediated by technologies, like turnstiles that intervene in fare-dodging in the subway and antenatal diagnostic technologies that inform moral decisions about abortion (Verbeek 2011).


Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patient Technology Design Mediation Analysis Experimental Ethic 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Achterhuis, H. (1995) ‘De moralisering van de apparaten’, Socialisme en Democratie, 52(1): 3–12.Google Scholar
  2. Berdichewsky, D. and Neuenschwander, E. (1999) ‘Toward an Ethics of Persuasive Technology’, Communications of the ACM, 42(5): 51–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bouma, J.T., Voorbij, A. I. M., and Poelman, W. A. (2009) ‘The Influence of Changes in the Physical and Technical Design on Social Interactions in a Cohousing Community’, in Durmisevic, E. (ed.) Lifecycle Design of Buildings, Systems and Materials (Enschede: International Council for Building Research Studies and Documentation (CIB) and the University of Twente).Google Scholar
  4. Dorrestijn, S. (2012) ‘The Design of our Own Lives’, dissertation (University of Twente).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Foucault, M. (1997a) ‘What is Enlightenment?’, in Rabinow, P. (ed.) M. Foucault, Ethics: Subjectivity and Truth (New York: The New Press).Google Scholar
  6. Foucault, M. (2010) The Government of Self and Others: Lectures at the Collège de France 1982–1983, Davidson, A. I. (ed.) translated by G. Burchell (New York: Palgrave Macmillan).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Heidegger, M. (1971) ‘The Origin of the Work of Art’, in Anderson, J.M. and Freund, E. H. (eds) Poetry, Language, Thought (New York: Harper & Row).Google Scholar
  8. Hottois, G. (1996) Entre symboles et technosciences. Un itinéraire philosophique. (Paris: Editions Champ Vallon).Google Scholar
  9. Ihde, D. (1990) Technology and the Lifeworld (Bloomington/Minneapolis: Indiana University Press).Google Scholar
  10. Latour, B. (1993) We Have Never Been Modern (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
  11. Thaler, R. and Sunstein, C. (2008) Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness (New Haven: Yale University Press).Google Scholar
  12. Tromp, N., Hekkert, P., and Verbeek, P. P. (2011) ‘Design for Socially Responsible Behavior: A Classification of Influence Based on Intended User Experience’, Design Issues 27(3): 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Verbeek, P.P. (2005) What Things Do: Philosophical Reflections on Technology, Agency, and Design (University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press).Google Scholar
  14. Verbeek, P.P. (2009) ‘The Moral Relevance of Technological Artifacts’, in Duwell, M. (ed.) Evaluating New Technologies (Dordrecht: Springer).Google Scholar
  15. Verbeek, P.P. (2010) ‘Accompanying Technology: Philosophy of Technology after the Ethical Turn’, Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 14(1): 49–54.Google Scholar
  16. Verbeek, P.P. (2011) Moralizing Technology: Understanding and Designing the Morality of Things (Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Peter-Paul Verbeek 2013

Authors and Affiliations

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations