Skip to main content

Introduction

Enhancing Ethical Reflection in the Laboratory: How Soft Impacts Require Tough Thinking

  • Chapter
Ethics on the Laboratory Floor

Abstract

The lives of contemporary men and women are entangled with technology. The alarm clock that wakes them in the morning, the clothes they put on, the food they eat, the ways they move around, the heated and air-conditioned environments they reside in, their means of communication, their entertainment (television, movies, games, books)—all are examples of technological artefacts that many people use every day. These technological artefacts don’t fulfil their purposes by themselves, but depend on specific practices to do so. Sometimes these are modest, like knowing how to set the alarm; sometimes they are more complex like driving a car or handling a computer. Furthermore, all artefacts and their accompanying practices also presuppose that certain background conditions have been fulfilled (Sclove 1995). Picking up the jar of peanut butter on the breakfast table and asking where it comes from, who produced it and how, and how it arrived here reveals a long, heterogeneous and complex network of people, things and activities, such as farming skills, the production of fertilisers, flying and driving licenses, planes and cars, roads, road maintenance, petrol stations, traffic rules, police and so forth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Further reading

  • Beck, U. (1992) Risk Society. Towards a New Modernity (Cambridge: Polity Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Grin, J. and Grunwald A. (2000) Vision Assessment: Shaping Technology in the 21st Century Towards a Repertoire for Technology Assessment (Berlin: Springer Verlag).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lucivero, F., Swierstra, T. and Boenink, M. (2011) ‘Assessing Expectations: Towards a Toolbox for an Ethics of Emerging Technologies’, NanoEthics, 5(2): 129–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pols, J. (2012) Care at a Distance. On the Closeness of Technology (Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Turkle, S. (2010) Alone Together. Why We Expect More from Technology and Less From Each Other (New York: Basic Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wynne, B. (1996) ‘Misunderstood Misunderstandings. Social Identities and Public Uptake of Science’, in Irwin, A. and Wynne, B. (eds) Misunderstanding Science? The Public Reconstruction of Science and Technology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wynne, B. (2001) ‘Creating Public Alienation: Expert Cultures of Risk and Ethics on GMOs’, Science as Culture, 10(4): 446–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wynne, B. (2006) ‘Public Engagement as a Means of Restoring Public Trust in Science—Hitting the Note, but Missing the Music?’, Community Genetics, 9(3): 211–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

References

  • Akrich, M. (1992) ‘The De-Scription of Technical Objects’, in Bijker, W. and Law, J. (eds) Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, G. (2008) A Farewell to Alms: A Brief Economic History of the World. (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Harré, R. (2002) ‘Material Objects in Social Worlds’, Theory Culture Society, 19(23): 23–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holbrook, J. B. (2005) ‘Assessing the Science–Society Relation: The Case of the US National Science Foundation’s Second Merit Review Criterion’, Technology in Society, 27(4): 437–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keulartz, J., Schermer, M., Korthals, M. and Swierstra, T. (2004) ‘Ethics in a Technological Culture. A Programmatic Proposal for a Pragmatist Approach’, Science, Technology and Human Values, 29(1): 3–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1999) Pandora’s Hope. Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. (Boston, MA: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowotny, H., Scott, P. and Gibbons, M. (2001) Rethinking Science. Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty (Cambridge: Polity).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sclove, R. E. (1995) Democracy and Technology (New York: The Guilford Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Swierstra, T. (2005) ‘Hoe samen te leven met techniek?’, Wijsgerig Perspectief, 45(3): 18–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swierstra, T. and Te Molder, H. (2012) ‘Risk and Soft Impacts’, in Roeser, S., Hillerbrand, R., Peterson, M., and Sandin, P. (eds) Handbook of Risk Theory. Epistemology, Decision, Theory, Ethics and Social Implications of Risk (Dordrecht: Springer).

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Schomberg, R. (in press) ‘Prospects for Technology Assessment in a Framework of Responsible Research and Innovation’, in Dusseldorp, M. and Beecroft, R. (eds) Technikfolgen abschätzen lehren: Bildungspotenziale transdisziplinärer Methoden (Wiesbaden: Vs Verlag).

    Google Scholar 

  • Verbeek, P. P. (2005) What Things Do. Philosophical Reflections on Technology, Agency and Design (University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Verbeek, P. P. (2011) Moralizing Technology (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2013 Simone van der Burg and Tsjalling Swierstra

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

van der Burg, S., Swierstra, T. (2013). Introduction. In: van der Burg, S., Swierstra, T. (eds) Ethics on the Laboratory Floor. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137002938_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics