Abstract
How do queer feminist communities create sustainable spaces where alternative practices and experiences flourish? The easy answer is there are activists with vision and energy. But is this all it takes? Elsewhere, I have explored the part radicalized economic and sexual dynamics play in creating new kinds of places (Cooper, 2008). Here, I want to take a different angle on the question. I want to consider the contribution care can make. Conceiving care, somewhat counter-intuitively, as ‘weighted attentive action’, I want to ask: how does it shape the dynamic development of a new, queer, feminist space? Specifically, I’m interested in how such attentive action generates switch points, sheaths, transfers and intensifications of power, understanding power as the social energy through which things happen. This doesn’t mean rejecting an analysis of power relations. However, focusing exclusively on relations risks disregarding power’s actual character or force. So, from a post-Foucauldian perspective that conceptualizes power as the generation of effects, I explore how effects are affected by attentive action within the social and material context of a women and trans bathhouse in Toronto — a place, which since 1998, has been dedicated to creating and expressing new, queer sexualities.
I am indebted to Achala Chandani Abeysekara and Sarah Lamble for their early research assistance, to the AHRC Research Centre for Law, Gender and Sexuality for financial support, to Chanelle Gallant, Loralee Gillis, Corie Hammers, Adrian Maria Prattas, Carlyle Jansen and my anonymous interviewees for discussing the bathhouse with me, and to Margaret Davies, Emily Grabham, Didi Herman, Jon Goldberg-Hiller and Antu Sorainen for comments on earlier versions of this chapter.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Arendt, H. (1958) The Human Condition. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.
Bain, A. and Nash, C. (2006) ‘Undressing the Researcher: Feminism, Embodiment and Sexuality at a Queer Bathhouse Event’, Area 38: 99–106.
Bain, A. and Nash, C. (2007) ‘The Toronto Women’s Bathhouse Raid: Querying Queer Identities in the Courtroom’, Antipode 39: 17–34.
Benhabib, S. (2000) The Reluctant Modernism of Hannah Arendt. Lanham, MD: Rowan & Littlefield.
Berlant, L. and Warner, M. (2002) ‘Sex in Public’, in M. Warner (ed.), Publics and Counterpublics. New York: Zone Books, 187–208.
Binson, D. and Woods, W. (2003. ‘A Theoretical Approach to Bathhouse Environments’, Journal of Homosexuality 44: 23–31.
Browne, K. (2009) ‘Womyn’s Separatist Spaces: Rethinking Spaces of Difference and Exclusion’, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 34: 541–56.
Burgheart, C. and Blazer, S. (1981) ‘Sex Theatre’, The Drama Review 25: 69–78.
Butler, J. (2004) ‘Bodies and Power Revisited’, in D. Taylor and K. Vintges (eds), Feminism and the Final Foucault. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press, 183–94.
Caillois, R. (1961) Man, Play, and Games, trans. M. Barash. New York: Free Press.
Calhoun, C. (1997) ‘Plurality, Promises and Public Spaces’, in C. Calhoun and J. McGowan (eds), Hannah Arendt and the Meaning of Politics. Minneapolis, MN: Minnesota University Press, 239–59.
Cooper, D. (2007a) ‘ “Well, You Go There To Get Off”’: Visiting Feminist Care Ethics through a Women’s Bathhouse’, Feminist Theory 8: 243–62.
Cooper, D. (2007b) ‘Opening up Ownership: Community Belonging, Belongings, and the Productive Life of Property’, Law and Social Inquiry 32: 625–64.
Cooper, D. (2008) ‘Intersectional Travels through Everyday Utopias: The Difference Economic and Sexual Dynamics Make’, in E. Grabham, D. Cooper, J. Krishnadas, and D. Herman (eds), Intersectionality and Beyond: Law, Power and the Politics of Place. London: Routledge Cavendish.
Cvetkovich, A. and Wang, S. (2001) ‘Don’t Stop the Music: Roundtable Discussion with Workers from Michigan Womyn’s Music Festival’, GLQ 7: 131–51.
Ewald, F. (1990) ‘Norms, Discipline, and the Law’, Representations 30: 138–61.
Foucault, M. (1980) Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977, ed. C. Gordon, trans. C. Gordon, L. Marshall, J. Mepham and K. Soper. Harlow: Pearson Education.
Foucault, M. (1988) Politics, Philosophy and Culture. London: Routledge.
Gallant, C. and Gillis, L. (2001) ‘Pussies Bite Back: The Story of the Women’s Bathhouse Raid’, Torquere: Journal of the Canadian Lesbian and Gay Studies Association 3: 152–67.
Hammers, C. (2008) ‘Bodies that Speak and the Promise of Queer: Looking to Two Lesbian/Queer Bathhouses for a Third Way’, Journal of Gender Studies 17: 147–64.
Hammers, C. (2009) ‘Making Space for an Agentic Sexuality?: The Examination of a Lesbian/Queer Bathhouse’, Sexualities 11: 547–72.
Honig, B (1993) Political Theory and the Displacement of Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Honig, B. (1995) Feminist Interpretations of Hannah Arendt. University Park, PA: Penn State University Press.
Huizinga, J. (1970) Homo Ludens: A Study of the Play Element in Culture. London: Temple Smith.
Keenan, S. (2010) ‘Subversive Property: Reshaping Malleable Spaces of Belonging’, Social and Legal Studies 19: 423–39.
Lamble, S. (2009) ‘Unknowable Bodies, Unthinkable Sexualities: Lesbian and Transgender Legal Invisibility in the Toronto Women’s Bathhouse Raid’, Social and Legal Studies 18: 111–30.
Nash, C. and Bain, A. (2007) ‘”Reclaiming Raunch”: Spatializing Queer Identities at Toronto Women’s Bathhouse Events’, Journal of Social and Cultural Geography 8: 47–62.
Nietzsche, F. (1997) ‘Homer’s Contest’, in Agonistics: Arenas of Creative Contest, ed. J. Lungstrum and E. Sauer. Albany, NY: SUNY Press, 35–45.
Prior, J. and Cusack, C. (2008) ‘Ritual, Liminality and Transformation: Secular Spirituality in Sydney’s Gay Bathhouses’, Australian Geographer 39: 271–81.
Roseneil, S. (2000). Common Women, Uncommon Practices: The Queer Feminisms of Greenham. London: Continuum.
Rudy, K. (1999) ‘Sex Radical Communities and the Future of Sexual Ethics’, Journal of Lesbian Studies 3: 133–42.
Schechner, R. (1985) Between Theatre and Anthropology. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Simons, J. (1995) Foucault and the Political. London: Routledge.
Tattelman, I. (1999) ‘Speaking to the Gay Bathhouse: Communicating in Sexually Charged Spaces’, in W. Leap (ed.), Public Sex/Gay Space. New York: Columbia University Press, 71–93.
Taylor, D. (1998) ‘Border Watching’, in P. Phelan and J. Lane (eds), The Ends of Performance. New York: New York University Press, 178–185.
Taylor, D. and Vintges, K. (2004) Feminism and the Final Foucault. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
Tewksbury, R. (2002) ‘Bathhouse Intercourse: Structural and Behavioral Aspects of an Erotic Oasis’, Deviant Behavor 23: 75–112.
Thiele, L. P. (1990) ‘The Agony of Politics: The Nietzschean Roots of Foucault’s Thought’, American Political Science Review 84: 907–25.
Valentine, G. (1997) ‘Making Space: Lesbian Separatist Communities in the United States’, in P. Cloke and J. Little (eds), Contested Countryside Cultures: Otherness, Marginalisation and Rurality. London: Routledge, 105–17.
Warner, T. (2002) Never Going Back: A History of Queer Activism in Canada. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Weinberg, M. S. and Williams, C. J. (1979) ‘Gay Baths and the Social Organization of Impersonal Sex’, in M. P. Levine (ed.), Gay Men: The Sociology of Homosexuality. New York: Harper & Row.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2012 Davina Cooper
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cooper, D. (2012). Erotic Care: A Queer Feminist Bathhouse and the Power of Attentive Action. In: Hines, S., Taylor, Y. (eds) Sexualities: Past Reflections, Future Directions. Genders and Sexualities in the Social Sciences. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137002785_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137002785_12
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-33126-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-00278-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social Sciences CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)