Skip to main content
  • 263 Accesses

Abstract

Adequate discussions have already ensued in this book about the UN vis-à-vis the international politics of Africa, and about Africa’s recent significant global partner (China). Hence, this final chapter concentrates on Africa’s relations with two historical global partners: the EU and the WTO.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Dot Keet, Economic Partnership Agreements: Responses to the EU Offensive Against ACP Developmental Regions (Amsterdam: Transnational Institute, 2007), 10.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Barbara Stocking, “Seismic Rupture: Africa-European Union Trade,” The World Today 64, no. 1 (2008): 22.

    Google Scholar 

  3. GhanaWeb, “Nobel Economist Stiglitz Criticizes EPA,” GhanaWeb, July 8, 2008, http://www.ghanaweb.com/GhanaHomePage/NewsArchive/artikel.php?ID=146532 (accessed July 8, 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  4. GhanaWeb, “ECOWAS Gets Tough on EU,” GhanaWeb, October 20, 2009, http://www.ghanaweb.com/GhanaHomePage/NewsArchive/artikel.php?ID=170537 (accessed October 20, 2009).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bilaterals.Org, “Experts Called in to Fix Customs Union Split,” Bilaterals.Org, October 7, 2010, http://www.bilaterals.org/spip.php?article18253 (accessed November 17, 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bilaterals.Org, “EPA the Biggest Threat to African Integration, Keet,” Bilaterals.Org, August 19, 2010, http://www.bilaterals.org/spip.php?article17928 (accessed November 17, 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bilaterals.Org, “EAC Likely to Miss November EU Trade Deadline,” Bilaterals.Org, October 28, 2010, http://www.bilaterals.org/spip.php?article18384 (accessed November 17, 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Transnational Institute, “The WTO Doha round and EPAs in an Era of Crisis: Salvation or Suicide for ACP Countries,” Transnational Institute, September 2010, http://www.tni.org/article/wto-doha-round-and-epas-era-crisis-0 (accessed April 13, 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  9. World Trade Organization, World Trade Report 2010 (Geneva: WTO Publications, 2010), 18.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. According to Richard Quest, during “Quest Means Business,” CNN on October 8, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2011 Michael Amoah

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Amoah, M. (2011). International Politics of Africa. In: Nationalism, Globalization, and Africa. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137002167_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics