Abstract
This chapter examines the challenges to the legitimacy of Vietnam’s one-party state and the state’s responses to these challenges in the period from 1986 to the present. The chapter is divided into four sections. The first section provides a brief overview of the evolution of the Vietnamese state and the historical basis of regime legitimacy from 1945 to 1976. The second section considers the evolving challenges to the political legitimacy of one-party rule mounted by southern war veterans, communist intelligentsia, nonparty elites, peasants, retired senior generals, and prodemocracy activists with a particular focus on the period after the collapse of socialism in Eastern Europe and the Soviet Union in 1989–1991. Critics challenged the basis of the regime’s legitimacy on four fronts: ideology, economic performance, legal-rational, and nationalism. The third section examines the regime’s responses to each of these challenges. Finally, the chapter concludes by noting that Vietnam’s one-party state rests on multiple sources of legitimacy and party elites have accommodated and adjusted their policies in response to criticisms from their critics.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bui Tin. 1990. “A Citizen’s Petition.” Vietnam Commentary 18 (November–December): 13–15.
Hiebert, Murray. 1993. “Dissenting Voices.” Far Eastern Economic Review 2 (December): 26.
Hoang Minh Chinh. 1991. “Commentary on the Draft Platform.” Vietnam Commentary 20 (March–April): 6–11.
Mudie, Luisetta. 2006. “Vietnam Nervous Over Emerging Pro-Democracy Voices.” Radio Free Asia, September 29. Accessed February 5, 2010. http://www.rfa.org/english/vietnam/vietnam_8406–20060929.html.
Lu Phuong. 1990. “Chu Nghia Xa Hoi Viet Nam Di San Va Doi Moi” [The Legacy of Vietnamese Socialism and Renovation].” Doan Ket (7/8): 24–29.
Nguyen Khac Vien. 1991. “Letter to the Vietnam Fatherland Front.” Vietnam Commentary 20 (March–April): 4–6.
Nguyen Nam Khanh. 2004. “Thu cua Thuong tuong Nguyen Nam Khanh gui Lanh dao Dang ve su long quyen cua Tong cuc 2” [Letter from Major General Nguyen Nam Khanh to the Party Leadership Regarding the Abuse of Power by General Directorate 2]. Quê Me: Action for Democracy in Vietnam (June 17). Accessed February 5, 2010. http://www.queme.net/vie/docs_detail.php?numb=145
Nguyen Xuan Tu. 1993. “Doi Dieu Suy Nghi Cua Mot Cong Dan” [Reflections of a Citizen].
Steinglass, Matt. 2006. “Dissident Numbers Grow in Vietnam.” Voice of America. October 16.
Thayer, Carlyle A. 1988. “The Regularization of Politics: Continuity and Change in the Party’s Central Committee, 1951–1986.” In Postwar Vietnam: Dilemmas in Socialist Development, edited by David G. Marr and Christine P. White, 177–193. Ithaca, NY: Southeast Asia Program, Cornell University.
—. 1992a. Political Developments in Vietnam: From the Sixth to Seventh National Party Congress. Regime Change and Regime Maintenance in Asia and the Pacific Discussion Paper Series No. 5. Canberra, Australia: Department of Political & Social Change, Research School of Pacific Studies, The Australian National University.
—. 1992b. “Political Reform in Vietnam: Doi Moi and the Emergence of Civil Society.” In The Developments of Civil Society in Communist Systems, edited by Robert F. Miller, 110–129. Sydney, Australia: Allen & Unwin.
—. 1995. “Mono-Organizational Socialism and the State.” In Vietnam’s Rural Transformation, edited by Benedict J. Tria Kerkvliet and Doug J. Porter, 39–64. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
—. 2006. “Political Dissent and Political Reform in Vietnam, 1997–2002.” In The Power of Ideas: Intellectual Input and Political Change in East and Southeast Asia, edited by Claudia Derichs and Thomas Heberer, 115–132. Copenhagen S, Denmark: Nordic Institute of Asian Studies Press.
—. 2008. “Vietnam.” In PSI Handbook of Global Security and Intelligence: National Approaches, vol. 1—The Americas and Asia, edited by Stuart Farson, Peter Gill, Mark Phythian, and Shlomo Shapiro, 300–317. Westport, CT and London: Praeger Security International.
—. 2009a. “Political Legitimacy of Vietnam’s One Party-State: Challenges and Responses.” Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs 28 (4): 47–70.
—. 2009b. “Vietnam and the Challenge of Political Civil Society.” Contemporary Southeast Asia 31 (1): 1–27.
—. 2010a. “Political Legitimacy in Vietnam: Challenge and Response.” Politics & Policy 38 (3): 423–444.
—. 2010b. “The Trial of Le Cong Dinh: New Challenges to the Legitimacy of Vietnam’s Party-State.” Journal of Vietnamese Studies 5 (3): 196–207.
Tønnesson, Stein. 1993. “Applying Mathematics and Democracy (Interview with Phan Dinh Dieu).” NIASnytt2: 11–14.
Tran Do. 1997–1998. “Tinh hinh dat nuoc vai tro cua dang Cong San” [The State of the Nation and the Role of the Communist Party]. Faxed copy of General Tran Do’s letter sent to the Party, National Assembly, Government and Concerned Friends, received from the BBC Vietnamese Service on February 9, 1998. 13 pp. with 5 page appendix.
Vo Nguyen Giap. 2004. Letter to Central Committee, Comrade Secretary-General, Comrades of the Politburo, Secretariat and Central Control Committee, January 3.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2011 John Kane, Hui-Chieh Loy, and Haig Patapan
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Thayer, C.A. (2011). Political Legitimacy in Vietnam under Challenge. In: Kane, J., Loy, HC., Patapan, H. (eds) Political Legitimacy in Asia. Palgrave Series on Asian Governance. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137001474_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137001474_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-34102-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-00147-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)