Skip to main content

Democracy and the Challenge of Gender: New Visions, New Processes

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Women’s Studies at York Series ((WSYS))

Abstract

Democracy has always been a contested concept, among theorists as well as practitioners. From being considered a dangerous means of introducing ‘mob rule’ it has become the political system which most states claim to have adopted (Arblaster 1994). Nevertheless, debates about the fundamental values of democratic politics and the best ways of expressing them in institutions continue to absorb the attention of politicians, activists and writers. Political theory, from its very beginnings, has been fascinated by democracy, yet there continues to be confusion and disagreement about how it can be achieved and by what criteria a state or other institution can be judged to be democratic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anthias, F. and Yuval-Davis, N. (1983) ‘Contextualising Feminism: Gender, Ethnic and Class Divisions’, Feminist Review, 15, 67–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arblaster, A. (1994) Democracy, Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, M. and Phillips, A. (eds) (1992) Destablizing Theory: Contemporary Feminist Debates, Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beasley, C. (1999) What is Feminism? An Introduction to Feminist Theory, London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beetham, D. (1992) ‘Liberal Democracy and the Limits of Democratization’, Political Studies, XL, Special Issue, 40–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beetham, D. and Boyle, K. (1995) Introducing Democracy, Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benhabib, S. (1994) ‘Deliberative Rationality and Models of Democratic Legitimacy’, Constellations, 1 (1), 26–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bock, G. and James, S. (eds) (1992) Beyond Equality and Difference: Citizen-ship, Feminist Politics and Female Subjectivity, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, T. and Pateman, C. (1979) ‘Mere Auxiliaries to the Commonwealth: Women and the Origins of Liberalism’, Philosophical Quarterly, 27 (2), 183–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. and Scott J. (eds) (1992) Feminists Theorize the Political, London, New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charles, N. and Huntjens, H. (eds) (1998) Gender, Ethnicity and Political Ideologies, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, P. H. (1990) Black Feminist Thought, Boston: Unw in Hyman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coole, D. (1993) Women in Political Theory, Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietz, M. (1992) ‘Context is All: Feminism and Theories of Citizenship’, in Chantal Mouffe (ed.) 1992(a), 63–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elshtain, J. B. (1981) Public Man, Private Woman: Women in Social and Political Thought, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, J. (1989) ‘Feminist Organisations and Activities from Suffrage to Women’s Liberation’, in Freeman, 541–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, J. (1989) Women and Feminist Perspectives, Mountainview: Mayfield Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C. (1983) In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, K. B. (1990) ‘Citizenship in a Woman-Friendly Polity’, Signs, 15 (4), 781–812.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kymlicka, W. (1995) Contemporary Political Philosophy: An Introduction, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lijphart, A. (1997) Democracy in Plural Societies: A Comparative Exploration, New Haven, CN: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lister, R. (1997) Citizenship: Feminist Perspectives, London: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lovenduski, J. and Norris, P. (eds) (1993) Gender and Party Politics, London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansbridge, Jane (1983) Beyond Adversary, Democracy, Chicago, ILL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, J. (1966) ‘Women: The Longest Revolution’, New Left Review, 40, 11–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouffe, C. (ed) (1992a) Dimensions of Radical Democracy, London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouffe, C. (1992b) ‘Feminism, Citizenship and Radical Democratic Politics’, in Butler and Scott, 369–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouffe, C. (1993) The Return of the Political, London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narayan, U. (1997) ‘Towards a Feminist Vision of Citizenship: Rethinking the Implications of Dignity, Political Participation and Nationality’, in Shanley and Narayan, 48–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson, L. (1994) ‘Feminism and the Politics of Postmodernism’, in Wicke and Ferguson, 69–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, P. (1987) Politics and Sexual Equality: The Comparative Position of Women in Western Democracies, Brighton: Harvester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okin, S. M. (1979) Women in Western Political Thought, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okin, S. M. (1989) Justice, Gender and the Family, New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Sullivan, Noel (1997) ‘Difference and the Concept of the Political in Contemporary Political Philosophy’, Political Studies, 45 (4) 739–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pateman, C. (1986) ‘The Theoretical Subversiveness of Feminism’, in Pateman and Gross, 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pateman, C. and Gross, E. (eds) (1986) Feminist Challenges and Political Theory, London: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pateman, C. (1989) The Disorder of Women, Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pateman, C. (1992) ‘Equality, Difference, Subordination: The Politics of Motherhood and Women’s Citizenship’, in Bock and James, 17–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, A. (1991) Engendering Democracy, Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, A. (1992) ‘Universal Pretensions in Political Thought’, in Barrett and Phillips, 10–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, A. (1993) Democracy and Difference, Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, A. (1995) The Politics of Presence, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Randall, V. (1987) Women and Politics, An International Perspective, Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1973) A Theory of Justice, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruddick, S. (1989) Maternal Thinking: Towards a Politics of Peace, Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Squires, J. (1996) ‘Liberal Constitutionalism, Identity and Difference’, Political Studies, XLIV, Special Issue, 620–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanley, M. L. and Narayan, U. (eds) (1997) Reconstructing Political Theory, Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waylen, G. (1998) ‘Women’s Activism, Authoritarianism and Democratisation in Chile’ in Charles and Huntjens, 146–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wicke, J. and Ferguson, M. (1994) Feminism and Postmodernism, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, I. M. (1990a) ‘Throwing Like a Girl’ and Other Essays in Feminist Philosophy and Social Theory, Bloomington, Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, I. M. (1990b) ‘Polity and Group Difference’, in Young (1990a) 114–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuval-Davis, N. (1997) Gender and Nation, London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2000 Carmel Roulston

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Roulston, C. (2000). Democracy and the Challenge of Gender: New Visions, New Processes. In: Roulston, C., Davies, C. (eds) Gender, Democracy and Inclusion in Northern Ireland. Women’s Studies at York Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780333985397_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics