Skip to main content

Sino-American Relations in the Post-Cold War Era

  • Chapter
China in Transition

Abstract

The disintegration of the Soviet bloc, as well as the Soviet Union (USSR) itself, removed the strategic rationale that formed the basis for Sino-American relations for almost two decades. When the USSR was a common threat for both powers, realpolitik determined that strategic relationship prevailed over other considerations such as ideological conflicts, the nature of political institutions, and mutual economic interests. With the advent of the post-Cold War era, Sino-American relations need to be built on new bases. The vicissitudes of Sino-American relations since 1989 support the diagnosis of Harry Harding, that the two countries are bound by cooperation, competition and conflict in all aspects of their relations.1 However, the question of the extent to which the opportunities of cooperation between the two countries in a certain area are affected or sacrificed by competition and conflict in other areas remains to be examined. It is obvious that national security issues and economic interests are becoming the prime considerations for the foreign policy decision-makers of both nations, thus further development of Sino-American relations should seek better understanding and common ground on these two basic factors. But the Chinese perception of the hegemonic nature of the only superpower, which seeks to promote its own (Western) values of democracy and human rights, further complicates the difficult relations in the beginning of this post-Cold War period.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and references

  1. See Harry Harding, The Fragile Relationship: Sino American Relations since 1972 (New York: The Brookings Institution, 1992.)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jia Qingguo, ‘Reconsidering Sino-American Relations’, American Studies (Beijing), No. 1 (1995), p. 38.

    Google Scholar 

  3. See interview of Henry Kissinger in Far Eastern Economic Review (16 November 1995), p. 26.

    Google Scholar 

  4. See Patrick E. Tyler, ‘China’s Campus Model for the 90s: Ernest Patriot’, New York Times, 23 April 1996, p. A4.

    Google Scholar 

  5. See David M. Lampton, ‘China and the Strategic Quadrangle: Foreign Policy Continuity in an Age of Discontinuity’ in Michael Mandelbaum (ed.), The Strategic Quadrangle (New York: Council on Foreign Relations Press, 1995), p. 66.

    Google Scholar 

  6. See Ting Wai, ‘China and the New International Political Order: Perceptions and Policy Orientations’, in K. S. Liao (ed.), Politics of Economic Cooperation in the Asia-Pacific Region (Hong Kong: Institute of Asia-Pacific Studies, Chinese University of Hong Kong, 1993), pp. 45–65.

    Google Scholar 

  7. See Xi Laiwan, ‘New Asia-Pacific Policy of the United States and its Prospects’, in Hsueh Chun-tu and Lu Zhongwei (ed), China and her Neighbours: Prospects for the Twenty-First Century (Beijing: Current Affairs Publishing Co., 1995), p. 191.

    Google Scholar 

  8. David Shambaugh is correct in pointing out that ‘Chinese definitions of national security have always included an essential linkage between internal and external security, and have always considered threats to political “stability” to be threats to national security’. See D. Shambaugh, ‘The Insecurity of Security: the PLA’s Evolving Doctrine and Threat Perceptions towards 2000’, Journal of Northeast Asian Studies, vol. 13, No. 1 (Spring 1994), p. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  9. See ‘Text of Anthony Lake’s remarks to Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies’, 21 September 1993, in W. Q. Bowen and D. H. Dunn, American Security Policy in the 1990s (Aldershot: Dartmouth Publishing, 1996), pp. 158–160.

    Google Scholar 

  10. See William Clinton, A National Security Strategy of Engagement and Enlargement (The White House, February 1995), p. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Winston Lord, ‘A Sweet and Sour Relationship’ (Interview), Current History, Vol. 94, no. 593 (September 1995), pp. 248–251.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Winston Lord, ‘For China, not Containment but True Integration’, International Herald Tribune, 13 October 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  13. See William J. Murphy, ‘Power Transition in Northeast Asia: US—China Security Perceptions and the Challenges of Systemic Adjustment and Stability’, Journal of Northeast Asian Studies, Vol. 13, no. 4 (Winter 1994), p. 80. This view, of course, is based on the assumption that Chinese leaders are divided into conservative and moderate (reformist) factions.

    Google Scholar 

  14. See Les Aspin, Report of the Secretary of Defense to the President and the Congress 1994, January 1994, in Bowen and Dunn, p. 161.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zheng Yin, ‘Asia—Pacific Region: Multiple Angles and the Five Parties’, Contemporary International Relations (Beijing), No. 60, October 1994, p. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  16. See David Shambaugh, ‘The United States and China: A New Cold War?’, Current History, vol. 94, no. 593 (September 1995), p. 244

    Google Scholar 

  17. N. B. Tucker, Taiwan, Hong Kong and the United States, 1945–1992: Uncertain Friendship (New York: Twayne Publishing, 1994), pp. 5–6.

    Google Scholar 

  18. See E. Friedman, ‘The Challenge of a Rising China: Another Germany?’, in R. Liebert (ed.), Eagle Adrift: American Foreign Policy at the End of the Century (New York: Longman, 1997), pp. 215–45.

    Google Scholar 

  19. See E. W. Eikenberry, ‘Explaining and Influencing Chinese Arms Transfers’, McNair Paper 36, February 1995 (Washington, DC: Institute for National Strategic Studies, National Defense University), p. 27.

    Google Scholar 

  20. See Robert S. Ross, Negotiating Cooperation: the United States and China, 1969–1989 (Stanford: Stanford University Press), 1995. p. 261.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1999 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wai, T. (1999). Sino-American Relations in the Post-Cold War Era. In: Teather, D.C.B., Yee, H.S., Campling, J. (eds) China in Transition. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780333983829_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics