Advertisement

The Collapse

  • David Lockwood
Chapter
  • 40 Downloads

Abstract

By 1991, the Soviet rulers were divided by the very reform process they had initiated in order to ensure their own survival. One wing (around Gorbachev) wanted to press ahead with perestroika, and hoped that the national economy, as well as its own rule (if not that of the Communist Party), could somehow survive its rigours. Another (the ‘conservatives’) wanted either to halt, or to turn back. Still another (now gathering in the Republican capitals) was eager for further and faster reform, despite the shutdowns, deindustrialization and political upheaval it might entail.

Keywords

World Market Communist Party Industrial Manager Rule Class Soviet Economy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    See Galina Rakitskaia, ‘The Struggle for Property is a Struggle for Power in the Economy’, Problems of Economic Transition, 35 (5), September 1992, pp. 14–22 at p. 17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 3.
    Donald Filtzer, ‘The Contradictions of the Marketless Market’, Soviet Studies, 43 (6), 1991, pp. 989–1009 at p. 990.Google Scholar
  3. 4.
    Izvestia, 15 December 1989 in Ottorino Cappelli, ‘The Short Parliament 1989–1991: Political Elites, Societal Cleavages and the Weakness of Party Politics’, Journal of Communist Studies, 9 (1), March 1993, pp. 109–30 at p. 118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 6.
    Congress of People’s Deputies, Documents and Materials, Moscow: Novosti, 1989, pp. 22, 74.Google Scholar
  5. 9.
    Poul Funder Larsen, ‘Whatever happened to the Soviet Communist Party?’, International Viewpoint, No. 217, 25 May 1991, pp. 3–7 at p. 3.Google Scholar
  6. 12.
    W. W. Rostow, The Stages of Economic Growth, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990, p. 51.Google Scholar
  7. 19.
    Pekka Sutela, ‘Insider Privatization in Russia: Speculations on Systemic Change’, Europe-Asia Studies, 46 (3), 1994, pp. 417–35 at p. 420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Vladislavlev in David Remnick, ‘Nomenklatura Quick to Seize Capitalist Opportunities’, Washington Post (supplement to Guardian Weekly), 9 June 1991Google Scholar
  9. V. Naishul’, ‘Kto stanet sobstvennikom?’, Izvestia, No. 342, 9 December 1990, p. 2.Google Scholar
  10. 22.
    Quoted in Simon Clarke, ‘Privatization and the Development of Capitalism in Russia’, New Left Review, No. 196, November/December 1992, pp. 3–27 at p. 15. Aleksandr Yakovlev described the process as ‘the primary accumulation of capital’ (‘Mozhno li ochelovechit’ vlast”, Moskovskie Novosti, No. 56, 13–20 November 1994, p. 8). Jacek Rostowski (on Poland) believed that ‘the nomenklatura would with time transform itself into a new capitalist bourgeoisie…’ (‘The Decay of Socialism and the Growth of Private Enterprise in Poland’, Soviet Studies, 41 (2), April 1989, pp. 194–214 at p. 209). Igor Filatotchev, Trevor Buck and Mike Wright said that spontaneously privatized firms would ‘evolve fairly quickly into conventional capitalist firms…’ (‘Privatisation and Buy-outs in the USSR’, Soviet Studies, 44 (2), 1992, pp. 265–82 at p. 279.Google Scholar
  11. 24.
    See Sutela, ‘Insider’, p. 421; Eric Lohr, ‘Arkady Volsky’s political base’, Europe-Asia Studies, 45 (5), 1993, pp. 811–29 at p. 821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 26.
    Seppo, ‘Enterprises’, p. 11; David Seppo, ‘The Soviet Economy: the Fight for control’, International Viewpoint, No. 200, 18 February 1991, pp. 14–17 at p. 17.Google Scholar
  13. 28.
    Seppo, ‘Control’, p. 16. See also Michael Burawoy on regional CP leaders leaving to become enterprise directors (‘The End of Sovietology and the Renaissance of Modernization Theory’, Contemporary Sociology, 21 (6), 1992, pp. 774–85 at p. 783), and Philip Hanson, ‘Local Power and Market Reform in Russia’, Communist Economies and Economic Transformation, 5 (1), 1993, pp. 45–60 at p. 55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 29.
    Russian Far East Update, February 1994, p. 11; Peter Kirkow and Philip Hanson, ‘The Potential for Autonomous Regional Development in Russia: the Case of Primorskiy Krai’, Post-Soviet Geography, 35 (2), February 1994, pp. 63–88 at p. 82Google Scholar
  15. Zakhar Vinogradov, ‘Far Eastern Regionalism’, Vostok Rossii, No. 7, February 1992, in SUPAR, No. 13, July 1992, p. 31.Google Scholar
  16. 31.
    See Yuri Burtin, ‘Nomenklaturnaya sobstvennost’ vchera i segodnya’, Moskovskie Novosti, No. 35, 28 Aug.–4 Sept. 1994, p. 7Google Scholar
  17. Steven Rosefielde, ‘Hyper-Depression: the Political Economy of Russia’s Elusive Transition’, unpublished manuscript made available to the author in August 1994, p. 3Google Scholar
  18. S. David Young, ‘Going to Market: Economic Organization and Transformation in a Hungarian Firm’, World Development, 21 (6), 1983, pp. 883–99 at p. 883.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 34.
    This seems to have been the case even in the (relatively) advanced MIC. See Kevin O’Prey, A Farewell to Arms? Russia’s Struggles with Defense Conversion, New York: Twentieth Century Fund Press, 1995, p. 61.Google Scholar
  20. 37.
    Peter Rutland quoted in Wyn Grant, ‘Business Associations in Eastern Europe and Russia’, Journal of Communist Studies, 9 (2), June 1993, p. 98.Google Scholar
  21. 38.
    Michael Burawoy and Pavel Krotov, ‘The Economic Basis of Russia’s Political Crisis’, New Left Review, No. 198, March–April 1993, pp. 49–69 at pp. 54, 64–5. And before them, Lenin had warned that, while merchant capital was important for the eventual development of industrial capital: ‘… the degree of development of merchant’s capital is inversely proportional to the degree of development of industrial capital’ (V. I. Lenin, The Development of Capitalism in Russia, Moscow: Progress Press, 1964, p. 440).Google Scholar
  22. 40.
    The Economist, 16 January 1993, p. 44; Business Week, 3 May 1993, p. 24; Peter Biziukov and Simon Clarke, ‘Privatization in Russia — the Road to a People’s Capitalism?’, Monthly Review, 44 (6), November 1992, pp. 38–45 at p. 40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Simon Clarke, Peter Fairbrother, Vadim Borisov and Petr Bizyukov, ‘The Privatisation of Industrial Enterprises in Russia: Four Case Studies’, Europe-Asia Studies, 46 (2), 1994, pp. 179–214 at p. 211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 41.
    See Kevin R. McDonald, ‘Why Privatization is not Enough’, Harvard Business Review, January–February 1993, pp. 44–54 at p. 46.Google Scholar
  25. 43.
    Paul Lawrence and Caralambos Vlachoutsichos, ‘Joint Ventures in Russia: Put the Locals in Charge’, Harvard Business Review, January–February 1993, pp. 44–54 at p. 46.Google Scholar
  26. 44.
    Igor Bunin, ‘Russian Bear’s New Clothes’, Financial Times, 27 September 1994.Google Scholar
  27. 45.
    Nicoletta Amodio, ‘From Ministries to Corporations’, Journal of Communist Studies, 9 (1), March 1993, pp. 227–39 at p. 238; McDonald, ‘Not Enough’CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Anthony Lavitas and Piotr Strzalkowski, ‘What Does “uwlaszczenie nomenklatury” (“Propertisation” of the nomenklatura) Really Mean?’, Communist Economies, 2 (3), 1990, pp. 413–16 at p. 414; Winiecki, Resistance; Hertzfield, ‘Joint Ventures’, pp. 82, 84. See also Radzukhovsky, ‘Amnesty’, p. 10; The Economist, 22 December 1990, p. 22; O’Prey, Farewell to Arms, p. 64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 46.
    V. Amelin, ‘Smogut li otraslevye ministerstva stat’ sub’ektami innovatsii?’, Voprosy ekonomiki, No. 10, October 1989, pp. 25–32 at p. 31.Google Scholar
  30. 49.
    Alexander Bim et al., ‘Hybrid Forms of Enterprise Organization in the Former USSR and the Russian Federation’, Comparative Economic Studies, 35 (1), Spring 1993, pp. 1–15 at p. 8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 50.
    V. S. Pavlov, ‘Budem realistami’, Trud, No. 33, 12 February 1991, p. 2.Google Scholar
  32. 51.
    V. A. Tikhonov, Co-operatives as a Form of Free Enterprise in the USSR, Melbourne: Centre for Soviet and East European Studies, 1990, p. 7.Google Scholar
  33. Anders Aslund, Gorbachev’s Struggle for Economic Reform, London: Pinter, 1989, pp. 159–67.Google Scholar
  34. 53.
    David Seppo, ‘The Hard Road Ahead’, International Viewpoint, No. 214, 14 October 1991, pp. 5–8, 8.Google Scholar
  35. 55.
    Moscow Business Week, 24 September 1992, p. 12. See also Yegor Gaidar, ‘A Tunnel Two Years Long’, Delovie Lyudi, No. 22, April 1992, p. 19.Google Scholar
  36. 56.
    Alexander Zaichenko, ‘Conflict and Contradiction’, Business in the USSR, October 1991, p. 13; Burbulis in Izvestia, 15 October 1993, in International Viewpoint, November 1993, p. 5.Google Scholar
  37. 57.
    As Tikhonov himself, despite his general optimism about the co-operatives, admits — see Tikhonov, Co-operatives, pp. 15, 16. See also A. Craig Copetas, Bear Hunting with the Politburo, New York: Simon & Schuster, 1991, pp. 32–3.Google Scholar
  38. 60.
    Esther Dyson, ‘Micro Capitalism: Eastern Europe’s Computer Future’, Harvard Business Review, January/February 1991, pp. 26–37 at pp. 28–32.Google Scholar
  39. 61.
    Quoted in Peter Galuszka, Patricia Kranz and Stanley Reed, ‘Russia’s New Capitalism’, Business Week, 10 October 1994, pp. 36–40 at p. 40.Google Scholar
  40. 63.
    Clarke, Workers, p. 216; Michael Burawoy and Kathryn Hendley, ‘Between Perestroika and Privatisation’, Soviet Studies, 44 (3), 1992, pp. 371–402 at pp. 389–90; Galuszka, ‘New Capitalism’, p. 37; Mike Haynes, ‘Class Recomposition, Class Power and the Transition in Eastern Europe’, unpublished paper, Wolverhampton Polytechnic, July 1992, p. 11 (and on the Hungarian case, p. 16).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 68.
    See Elizabeth Teague, ‘Splits in the Ranks of Russia’s “Red Directors”’, RFE/RL Research Report, I (35), 4 September 1992, pp. 6–10Google Scholar
  42. Wyn Grant, ‘Business Associations in Eastern Europe and Russia’, Journal of Communist Studies, 9 (2), June 1993, pp. 86–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Eric Lohr, ‘Arkadii Volsky’s Political Base’, Europe-Asia Studies, 45 (5), 1993, pp. 811–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Stephen Fortescue, ‘Industrialists, Business People and Politics in the New Russia’, paper presented to the Australasian Association for the Study of Socialist Countries Conference, Macquarrie University, 25 September 1993.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© David Lockwood 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Lockwood
    • 1
  1. 1.Flinders University of South AustraliaAustralia

Personalised recommendations