Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

The United States and Decolonization pp 188–206Cite as

Palgrave Macmillan

The United States and Britain’s Decolonization of Malaya, 1942–57

  • Chapter

Abstract

‘In the six months since the termination of hostilities with Japan it has become clear that the world is going through a colonial crisis unparalleled in history. The great empires built up by the Western European powers during four centuries have been shaken to their foundations. They are crumbling before our eyes.’1 This situation presented the United States with a dilemma. Were Americans to prop up these sick men of Europe or were they to smooth the pillow of the dying and act as midwife to emergent nations? As it happened, while ideologically committed to anti-colonialism, the United States approached Western dependencies in Southeast Asia in different ways. Transferring power to the Philippines on 4 July 1946, more or less according to a timetable set in 1935, the US held this up as a model for the European colonial powers to follow. None of them did. Impatient with Dutch intransigence in their struggle with the nascent Republic of Indonesia, in 1949 the American administration forced Holland to end its empire by threatening to withdraw Marshall Aid funding. By contrast, interpreting France’s war with the Vietminh as part of the world-wide containment of communism, the United States decided to assist the French empire, prolonging its natural life until that cataclysmic collapse at Dien Bien Phu in 1954.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. P. Bagby, State Department, ‘United States policy with respect to the decline of Western European Imperialism,’ 13 March 1946, National Archive, Washington DC, [NARA] Lot Files, RG 59: Lot54 D190, Box 5.

    Google Scholar 

  2. See Christopher Thorne, Allies of a Kind: the United States, Britain and the War against Japan, 1941–1945 (Oxford, 1978) and

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wm Roger Louis, Imperialism atBay 1941–1945: the United States and the Decolonization of the British Empire (Oxford, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  4. See Andrew James Whitfield, ‘British Imperial Consensus and the Return to Hong Kong, 1941–1945’, PhD, University of Birmingham, 1998; for postwar policy, see

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wm Roger Louis, ‘Hong Kong: the Critical Phase, 1945–1949’, American Historical Review, 104, no. 4 (Oct 1997), pp. 1052–84.

    Google Scholar 

  6. S. R. Ashton and S. E. Stockwell (eds), British Documents on End of Empire (BDEE]: Imperial Policy and Colonial Practice (London, 1996), I, doc. 32.

    Google Scholar 

  7. A. J. Stockwell (ed.), BDEE: Malaya (London, 1995), I, docs 4–9.

    Google Scholar 

  8. For the Atlantic Charter and subsequent discussions, see A. N. Porter and A. J. Stockwell (eds), British Imperial Policy and Decolonization, 1938–64, Vol. 1: 1938–51 (Basingstoke, 1987), docs. 8, 9, 15, 17, 18 and 20.

    Google Scholar 

  9. A. L. Moffat (State Department), ‘The dependent territories in Southeast Asia’, 17 Jan. 1945, RG 59: lot 54 D190, box 5.

    Google Scholar 

  10. For example, Queen Wilhelmina’s broadcast of Dec. 1942 promising the postwar reorganization of the Dutch empire as a commonwealth and de Gaulle’s Brazzaville Declaration of Jan. 1944 which, however, ruled out political development outside the imperial framework. See Thorne, Allies of a Kind, pp. 218–19 and 466–7, and Martin Thomas, The French Empire at War 1940–45 (Manchester, 1998), pp. 249–54.

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. F. Cady (State Department), ‘The importance of the Philippines with respect to United States policy in Southeastern Asia’, 2 Jan. 1946, RG 59, lot 54 D190, box 5.

    Google Scholar 

  12. See F. S. V. Donnison, British Military Administration in the Far East (London, 1956),

    Google Scholar 

  13. Peter Dennis, Troubled Days of Peace: Mountbatten and South East Asia Command, 1945–46 (Manchester, 1987), and

    Google Scholar 

  14. John Springhall, ‘“Disaster in Surabaya”; the Death of Brigadier Mallaby during the British Occupation of Java, 1945–6’, Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History (JICH), 24, 3 (Sept. 1996), pp. 422–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. For British colonial policy for Malaya, Singapore, and Sarawak, see Albert Lau, The Malayan Union Controversy 1942–1948 (Singapore, 1991),

    Google Scholar 

  16. R. H. W. Reece, The Name of Brooke: the End of White Rajah Rule in Sarawak (Kuala Lumpur, 1982), and

    Google Scholar 

  17. A. J. Stockwell, British Policy and Malay Politics during the Malayan Union Experiment, 1942–1948 (Kuala Lumpur, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wm Roger Louis and Ronald Robinson, ‘The Imperialism of Decolonization’, JICH, 22, 3 (Sept. 1994), 462–511, quote at p. 467.

    Google Scholar 

  19. See Robert J. McMahon, Colonialism and Cold War: the United States and the Struggle for Indonesian Independence, 1945–49 (Ithaca, 1981) and

    Google Scholar 

  20. George McT. Kahin, Intervention (New York, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  21. See Andrew J. Rotter, The Path to Vietnam: Origins of the American Commitment to Southeast Asia (Ithaca, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  22. See Benedict J. Kerkvliet, The Huk Rebellion: a Study of Peasant Revolution in the Philippines (Berkeley, 1977; 1979 edn), pp. 203–48.

    Google Scholar 

  23. A. J. Stockwell, ‘“A widespread and long-concocted plot to overthrow government in Malaya”? The Origins of the Malayan Emergency’, JICH, 21, 3 (Sept. 1993), pp. 66–88; see also

    Google Scholar 

  24. Anthony Short, The Communist Insurrection in Malaya (London, 1975) and

    Google Scholar 

  25. Richard Stubbs, Hearts and Minds in Guerrilla Warfare: the Malayan Emergency 1948–1960 (Singapore, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  26. H. T. Bourdillon (Colonial office), ‘Reflections on Colonial office organisation’, 10 May 1948, in Ronald Hyam (ed.), BDEE: the Labour Government and the End of Empire 1945–1951 (London, 1992), I, doc 70, para 6.

    Google Scholar 

  27. A. Eden, ‘British overseas obligations’, C(52)202, 18 June 1952, in Porter and Stockwell (eds), II, 1951–64, doc.11.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Charles S. Reed, Division of SE Asian Affairs, to the director, Far Eastern Affairs, Butterworth, 13 Aug. 1948, ibid., 607–9.

    Google Scholar 

  29. See A. J. Stockwell, ‘Malaysia: the Making of a Neo-Colony?’, JICH, 26, 2 (May 1998), 136–56.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. A. J. Stockwell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Historical and International Studies, De Montfort University, Leicester, UK

    David Ryan

  2. The Commonwealth Secretariat, London, UK

    Victor Pungong

Copyright information

© 2000 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stockwell, A.J. (2000). The United States and Britain’s Decolonization of Malaya, 1942–57. In: Ryan, D., Pungong, V. (eds) The United States and Decolonization. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780333977958_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation