Skip to main content

Institution-building and FDI Agenda

  • Chapter
Book cover Foreign Direct Investment in Russia
  • 218 Accesses

Abstract

A federal FDI agency holds a central position in FDI promotion and advice, both at enterprise and government levels. A long-term, systematic approach tofDI enhancement demands a powerful institution which is exclusively responsible for policy initiation and implementation, coordination and supervision of all matters concerning FDI. Investment approvals of strategic projects and advisory functions related to them should also be centralized within the agency.1 Competitor LEMs have instituted such agencies to handle these crucial and sensitive issues.2 The move has to a large extent gained trust and confidence among investors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. A. G. Witt, ‘Promoting Transnational Investment: Organizing to Serve Approved Investors’, Transnational Corporations Journal, 2(1), February 1993, pp. 86–88.

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. G. Witt, ‘Public Marketing of Foreign Investment: Successful International Offices Stand-Alone’, International Journal of Public Sector Management, 5(5), 1992, pp. 38–39.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sh. Rangnekar, ‘States Given More Latitude to Attract FDI in Core Sectors’, The Economic Times, 8 May 1998, p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  4. See also G. Magione, ‘The Agency Model: The Growth of Regulation and Regulatory Institutions in the European Union’, Eipascope, March 1997, pp. 9–14. These control mechanisms in fact refer not only tofDI agencies, but also to other regulatory bodies and ‘non-majoritarian’ institutions, i.e. institutions that, by design, are not directly accountable to voters or their elected representatives (e.g. central banks, supranational bodies like the European Commission and courts of law).

    Google Scholar 

  5. See also R. Mason et al, Strategic Management, 1994, p. 482.

    Google Scholar 

  6. According to the medium-term investment plan of the Ministry of the Economy, FDI has to be increased from US$2 billion in 1997 to US$10 billion in 2000. See OECD, Economic Survey, Russian Federation, 1997, pp. 123–9.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2000 Paul Fischer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fischer, P. (2000). Institution-building and FDI Agenda. In: Foreign Direct Investment in Russia. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780333977590_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics