Skip to main content

Changing Voters or Changing Models of Voting?

  • Chapter
Political Communications Transformed
  • 100 Accesses

Abstract

Commentators have frequently suggested that the political communications system has been transformed, at least in part, because of changes among its citizenry. These commentators contrast the apparent stability of voting behaviour in the 1940s and 1950s with the ‘volatility’ of the modern electorate. They suggest that voters have become less constrained by their social characteristics and less loyal to the parties than in the past. They suggest that voters have become more knowledgeable, more sophisticated and better able to choose between the parties on the basis of those issues discussed during the campaign. This rise of ‘issue voting’ has forced the parties to pay much greater attention to the conduct of campaigns and the quality of their communications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  • Russell J. Dalton, Citizen Politics in Western Democracies: Public Opinion and Political Parties in the United States, Great Britain, West Germany and France (Chatham, NJ: Chatham House, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • David Butler and Donald Stokes, Political Change in Britain: The Evolution of Electoral Preference, 2nd edn (London: Macmillan, 1974), pp. 20–3.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Martin Harrop and William L. Miller, Elections and Voters: A Comparative Introduction (London: Macmillan, 1987), p. 101; Ivor Crewe, ‘Voting and the Electorate’, in Patrick Dunleavy, Andrew Gamble, Ian Holiday and Gillian Peele (eds), Developments in British Politics 4 (London: Macmillan, 1993), pp. 92–122.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Angus Campbell, Philip E. Converse, Warren E. Miller and Donald E. Stokes, The American Voter (Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1976), ch. 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul F. Lazarsfeld, Bernard Berelson and Hazel Gaudet, The People’s Choice: How the Voter Makes Up His Mind in A Presidential Campaign (New York: Columbia University Press, 1948), p. 27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peter Pulzer, Political Representation and Elections in Britain (London: Allen & Unwin, 1967), p. 98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pippa Norris, ‘Theories of Political Communications’, in Pippa Norris, John Curtice, David Sanders, Margaret Scammell and Holli A. Semetko, On Message: Communicating the Campaign (London: Sage, 1999), p. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robert Worcester and Roger Mortimore, Explaining Labour’s Landslide (London: Politicos, 1999), p. 119.

    Google Scholar 

  • David Butler and Richard Rose, The British General Election of 1959 (London: Macmillan, 1960), p. 24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arthur Lupia and Matthew D. McCubbins, The Democratic Dilemma: Can Citizens Learn What They Need to Know? (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivor Crewe, ‘Do Butler and Stokes Really Explain Political Change in Britain?’, European Journal of Political Research, 2 (1974), 47–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anthony Downs, An Economic Theory of Democracy (New York: Harper & Row, 1957).

    Google Scholar 

  • Christopher H. Achen, ‘Social Psychology, Demographic Variables and Linear Regression: Breaking the Iron Triangle in Voting Research’, Political Behaviour, 14 (1992), 195–211, at p. 198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris P. Fiorina, Retrospective Voting in American National Elections (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1981), p. 190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donald Stokes, ‘Spatial Models of Party Competition’, in Angus Campbell, Philip E. Converse, Warren E. Miller and Donald Stokes, Elections and the Political Order. (London: John Wiley, 1966), pp. 161–79; Donald Stokes, ‘Valence Politics’, in Dennis Kavanagh (ed.), Electoral Politics (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992), pp. 141–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • David Sanders, ‘Why the Conservatives Won – Again’, in Anthony King (ed.), Britain at the Polls 1992 (Chatham, NJ: Chatham House, 1993), pp. 171–222;Michael S. Lewis-Beck, Economics and Elections: The Major Western Democracies (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  • Geoff Evans, ‘Economics, Politics and the Pursuit of Exogeneity: Why Pattie, Johnston and Sanders are Wrong’, Political Studies, 47 (1999), 933–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • David Sanders, ‘Economic Performance, Management Competence the Outcome of the Next General Election’, Political Studies, 44 (1996), 203–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anthony King, ‘Why Labour Won – At Last’, in Anthony King (ed.), New Labour Triumphs: Britain at the Polls (Chatham, NJ: Chatham House, 1998), pp. 185–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anthony Mughan, ‘Party Leaders and Presidentialism in the 1992 Election: A Post-War Perspective’, in David Denver, Colin Rallings and David Broughton (eds), British Elections and Parties Yearbook 1993 (Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1993), pp. 193–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • John R. Zaller, The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992), p. 6.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • David Sanders, ‘The Voters’, in Patrick Dunleavy, Andrew Gamble, Ian Holiday and Gillian Peele (eds), Developments in British Politics 5 (London: Macmillan, 1997), p. 55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivor Crewe and Katarina Thomson, ‘Party Loyalties: Realignment or Dealignment?’, in Geoffrey Evans and Pippa Norris (eds), Critical Elections: British Parties and Voters in Long-Term Perspective (London: Sage, 1999), pp. 64–86, Figure 4.1, p. 71.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ian Budge, Ivor Crewe, David McKay and Ken Newton, The New British Politics (Harlow: Longman, 1998), p. 363; Rose and McAllister, Voters Begin to Choose, ch. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anthony Heath et al., Understanding Political Change: the British Voter 1964–1987 (Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1991), p. 14.

    Google Scholar 

  • John Bartle, ‘Heterogeneity in Models of Vote Choice: Some Evidence from the British Election Study’, in Charles Pattie, David Denver, Justin Fisher and Steve Ludlam (eds), British Elections and Parties Review, Volume 7 (London: Frank Cass, 1997), pp. 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eric R. A. N, Smith, The Unchanging American Voter (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • Geoffrey Evans, John Curtice and Pippa Norris, ‘New Labour, New Tactical Voting? The Causes and Consequences of Tactical Voting in the 1997 General Election’, in David Denver, Justin Fisher, Philip Cowley and Charles Pattie (eds), British Elections and Parties Review, Volume 8. The 1997 General Election (London, Frank Cass, 1998), pp. 65–79.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2001 John Bartle

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bartle, J. (2001). Changing Voters or Changing Models of Voting?. In: Bartle, J., Griffiths, D. (eds) Political Communications Transformed. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780333977286_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics