Abstract
After Deng’s strategies of managing elite conflict and grooming pro-reform young leaders are reviewed, it is time to zero in on his efforts to put into action liberal measures in opening up the nation. Among major reform initiatives introduced by post-Mao leaders, few have caught as much attention as the opening of China. Thus in examining national reform policies, the Open Policy is chosen as the case study. Whether or not to open up China’s economy to the outside world was a highly controversial and sensitive issue concerning national pride among the elites and the populace. The forced opening of China after its defeat in the Opium War in the mid-nineteenth century, called the Open Door Policy, is different from the Open Policy engineered by Deng Xiaoping. The Open Door Policy has been viewed by the Chinese as a national disgrace as well as an imperialist imposition of trade preferences on a sovereign country. Communists came to power in 1949 with a strong anti-imperialist tone that deeply influenced the Chinese for the coming decades. For fervent nationalists, the nation’s opening in any form resembled a sell-out of national economic interests to foreign intruders and abandoning of decades-old hard-line policy against the West.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
In September 1980 Jiang Zemin, a deputy director of a national management committee on imports and exports, led a ministerial and provincial delegation to study six export processing zones in the world. The above history on SEZs is compiled from the following sources: Ye 2001; Yang 1998; Jing Tang, “Should the Wire Entanglement of Shenzhen Be Demolished,” posted at http://www.chinanews.com.cn in December 2000.
Ye supported Hua during 1978–1980 out of the conviction that Mao entrusted him at his dead bed to support the politically fragile successor Hua and that he should follow the Chinese tradition of fulfilling the will of a deceased “emperor” and supporting the young successor (Yang 1998: 101). Nevertheless, Ye was also traditional in another sense—he was keen to support economic development of his home province Guangdong and supported limited opening and limited use of foreign capital.
Copyright information
© 2006 Hongyi Lai
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lai, H. (2006). Selective and Showcase Liberalization. In: Reform and the Non-State Economy in China. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780312376161_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780312376161_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-53475-3
Online ISBN: 978-0-312-37616-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)