Advertisement

Pragmatism in Designing Popular Deliberative Institutions in the United States and China

  • Ethan J. Leib

Abstract

When I shared with friends that I was going to China to participate in a conference about how to institutionalize forms of deliberative democracy there, most people asked me the same questions: how can you talk about deliberative democracy in China without first talking about democracy more generally? Is it not more important to democratize China in the first instance and only later worry about how to get it to be a deliberative democracy? At first, these questions were paralyzing. I knew little about Chinese politics, but I knew enough to understand where these questions were coming from.

Keywords

Direct Democracy Deliberative Democracy Political Efficacy Participatory Democracy Competitive Election 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Works Cited

  1. Arendt, Hannah. 1965. On Revolution. New York: Viking Press.Google Scholar
  2. Atlee, Tom. 2003. The Tao of Democracy: Using Co-intelligence to Create a World That Works for All. Cranston, RI: Writer’s Collective.Google Scholar
  3. Brook, Timothy, and B. Michael Frolic. 1997. Civil Society in China. Armonk, NY: An East Gate Book.Google Scholar
  4. Cohen, Jerome A. 2005. “Law in Political Transitions: Lessons from East Asia and the Road Ahead.” Prepared for delivery at the International Conference on “Constitutional Re-Engineering in New Democracies: Taiwan & the World.” October 28–29, available at http://www.cpbae.nccu.edu.tw/tra/CRND/paper_eng.php, accessed on May 5, 2006.Google Scholar
  5. The China Post. 2005. “Deliberative Democracy’ Won’t Give Chen What He Wants.” November 8, available at http://www.chinapost.com.tw, accessed on January 1, 2006.
  6. Dryzek, John. 2005. “Deliberative Democracy in Divided Societies: Alternatives to Agonism and Analgesia.” Political Theory 33(2): 218–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fung, Archon. 2003. “Recipes for Public Spheres: Eight Institutional Design Choices and Their Consequences.” Journal of Political Philosophy 11(3): 338–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hibbing, John, and Elizabeth Theiss-Morse. 2002. Stealth Democracy: Amercians’ Belief About How Government Should Work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Leib, Ethan J. 2002. “Towards a Practice of Deliberative Democracy.” Rutgers Law Journal 33 (2): 359–456.Google Scholar
  10. Leib, Ethan J. 2004. Deliberative Democracy in America: A Proposal for a Popular Branch of Government. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Leib, Ethan J. 2005. “The Chinese Communist Party and Deliberative Democracy.” The Journal of Public Deliberation 1: 1–6.Google Scholar
  12. Leib, Ethan J. 2006. “Supermajoritarianism and the American Criminal Jury.” Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly 33 (2/3).Google Scholar
  13. Mansbridge, Jane. 1980. Beyond Adversary Democracy. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  14. McGinnis, John, and Michael Rappaport. 2002. “Our Supermajoritarian Constitution.” Texas Law Review 80: 703 ff.Google Scholar
  15. Montesquieu, Charles-Louis de Secondat. 1989. The Spirit of the Laws. Edited and translated by Anne Cohler, Basia Carolyn Miller, and Harold Samuel Stone. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Ogden, Suzanne. 2002. Inklings of Democracy in China. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Peng Bo. 2004. “Gouvernance des communautés résidentielles et contrôle étatique. La médiation communautaire à Shanghai.” Perspectives Chinoises 86: 14–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Pettit, Philip. 1997. Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Posner, Richard. 2003. Law, Pragmatism, and Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Spence, Jonathan. 2002. To Change China: Western Advisers in China, 1620–1960. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  21. Sunstein, Cass. 1997. Free Markets and Social Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Sunstein, Cass. 2001. Republic.com. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Sunstein, Cass. 2002. Risk and Reason: Safety, Law, and the Environment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Susskind, Lawrence, and Liora Zion. 2002. “Can America’s Democracy Be Improved?” Draft Working Paper of the Consensus Building Institute and the MIT-Harvard Public Disputes Program.Google Scholar
  25. Wang Hsiao-Wen. 2004. “Legalize Surrogates, Says Panel,” Taipei Times, September 19 (Vol. 5, No. 97), 2.Google Scholar
  26. Wang Hui. 2003. China’s New Order. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Ethan J. Leib and Baogang He 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ethan J. Leib

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations