Skip to main content
  • 244 Accesses

Abstract

When I told a friend in the Japanese media that I planned to write a book about his country’s foreign policy, he replied by joking, “Japanese foreign policy? Let me know if you find any!!”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Karel G. van Wolfren,“The Japan Problem,” Foreign Affairs, Vol. 65, No. 2 (Winter 1986/87), p. 289.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J.A.A. Stockwin et al., Dynamic and Immobilist Politics in Japan ( Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 1988 ).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kent E. Calder, “Japanese Foreign Economic Policy Formation: Explaining the Reactive State,” World Politics Vol. 40, No. 4 (July 1988), pp. 517–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Other explanations of the pervading dysfunction ofJapanese foreign policy include: Michael Blaker, “Evaluating Japan’s Diplomatic Performance,” in Gerald L. Curtis, ed., Japan’s Foreign Policy After the Cold War: Coping with Change ( New York: M.E. Sharpe, 1993 ), pp. 1–42;

    Google Scholar 

  5. Edward J. Lincoln, Japan’s New Global Role ( Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 1992 ).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Susan J. Pharr, “Japan’s Defensive Foreign Policy and the Politics of Burden Sharing,” in Gerald L. Curtis, ed., Japan’s Foreign Policy after the Cold War: Coping with Change ( New York: M.E. Sharpe, 1993 ), p. 235.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Eric Heginbotham and Richard J. Samuels, “Mercantile Realism and Japanese Foreign Policy,” International Security, Vol. 22, No. 4 (Spring 1998 ), p. 182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Peter J. Katzenstein and Takashi Shiraishi, Network Power: Japan and Asia ( Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1997 ), p. 34.

    Google Scholar 

  9. David Arase, Buying Power: The Political Economy of Japanese Foreign Aid ( New York: Lynne Rienner, 1995 );

    Google Scholar 

  10. Walter Hatch and Kōzō Yamamura, Asia in Japan’s Embrace: Building a Regional Production Alliance ( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996 );

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Dennis J. Encarnation, Rivals Beyond Trade: America versus Japan in Global Competition ( Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1995 ).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Steven Vogel, “The Power behind ”Spin On’s: “The Military Implications of Japan’s Commercial Technology,” in Wayne Sandholtz, Michael Borrus, et al., The Highest Stakes: The Economic Foundations of the Next Security System, ( New York: Oxford University Press, 1992 ), p. 76.

    Google Scholar 

  13. See Glenn D. Hook, Militarization and Demilitarization in Contemporary Japan (London: Routledge, 1996)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. See, for example, Herman Kahn, Japan: The Emerging Superstate ( Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1970 ).

    Google Scholar 

  15. More recent structural realist arguments that Japanese economic power will lead to the pursuit of military power include: George Friedman and Meredith LeBard, The Coming War with Japan ( New York: St. Martin’s, 1991 );

    Google Scholar 

  16. Christopher Layne, “The Unipolar Illusion,” International Security, Vol. 17, No. 4 (Spring 1993), pp. 5–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Rajan Menon, “The Once and Future Superpower: At Some Point Japan Is Likely to Build a Military Machine that Matches Its Economic Might,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientist, Vol. 52, No. 1 (January/February 1997), p. 34.

    Google Scholar 

  18. see Aaron Friedberg, “Ripe for Rivalry: Prospects for Peace in a Multipolar Asia,” in Michael E. Brown, Sean M. Lynn Jones, and Steve E. Miller, eds., East Asian Security ( Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1995 ).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Carol Gluck, “Patterns of Change; A ‘Grand Unified Theory’ of Japanese History,” Bulletin of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, Vol. 48 (March 1995), p. 38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. On the critique of monocausal mania, see Stephen M. Walt, “Rigor or Rigor Mortis? Rational Choice and Security Studies,” International Security, Vol. 23, No. 4 (Spring 1999 ), pp. 5–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. On norms and institutions, see Peter J. Katzenstein, ed., The Culture of National Security: Norms, Identity and World Politics ( New York: Columbia University Press, 1996 ).

    Google Scholar 

  22. On neoclassical realism, see Gideon Rose, “Neoclassical Realism and Theories of Foreign Policy,” World Politics, Vol. 51, No. 1 (October 1998), pp. 144–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. For a critique, see Jeffrey W. Legro and Andrew Moravcsik, “Is Anybody Still a Realist?” International Security, Vol. 24, No. 2 (Fall 1999 ), pp. 5–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2001 Michael J. Green

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Green, M.J. (2001). Introduction. In: Japan’s Reluctant Realism. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780312299804_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics