Abstract
If one reads a lot of anthropology, it is hard to escape the impression that theories of value are all the rage of late. One certainly sees references to “value” and “theories of value” all the time—usually thrown out in such a way as to suggest there is a vast and probably very complicated literature lying behind them.1 If one tries to track this literature down, however, one quickly runs into problems. In fact it is extremely difficult to find a systematic “theory of value” anywhere in the recent literature; and it usually turns out to be very difficult to figure out what body of theory, if any, that any particular author who uses the term “value” is drawing on. Sometimes, one suspects it is this very ambiguity that makes the term so attractive.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Copyright information
© 2001 David Graeber
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Graeber, D. (2001). Three Ways of Talking about Value. In: Toward An Anthropological Theory of Value. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780312299064_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780312299064_1
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-0-312-24045-5
Online ISBN: 978-0-312-29906-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social & Cultural Studies CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)