Abstract
In the second half of the nineteenth century, Prague underwent a rapid transformation from provincial backwater to one of the major cities in the Habsburg realm. For Czech historian Zdeněk Šolle, this change began with the revolutionary year 1848: ‘the events of 1848 showed the key position of Prague in the future of the crownland, and of the Czech nation. We can honestly date this year … as the beginning of a new stage in the development of the capital city of Prague’.1 Although the 1848 revolution was relatively short-lived in Prague, weakened by disputes between its Czech and German leaders and crushed by military force in June 1848, its long-term impact re-made the city. The abolition of serfdom helped accelerate industrial development within the Habsburg Empire, and the neo-absolutist regime imposed after the revolution instituted liberal economic policies which fuelled the expansion of business. The results were spectacular, and turned Prague into a thriving industrial and banking centre whose population grew from 146, 418 in 1843 to 514, 345 by the century’s end.2 The migration of peasants from the Czech-speaking countryside driving this population growth shifted the ethnic balance of the capital at a time when national movements were challenging traditional loyalties and creating new societal fault-lines based on language and ethnicity.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Z. Šolle, ‘Praha v obdobi 1848–1918’, in: J. Janáček (ed.), Dějiny Prahy (Prague, 1964 ), p. 45.
See: E. Babejová, Fin-De-Siècle Pressburg: Conflict and Cultural Coexistence in Bratislava 1867–1914 (Boulder, 2003 );
R. Nemes, The Once and Future Budapest (DeKalb, 2005 ).
J. King, Budweisers into Czechs and Germans: A Local History of Bohemian Politics 1848–1948 (Princeton, 2002 ), p. 20.
G.B. Cohen, The Politics of Ethnic Survival: Germans in Prague 1861–1914 (Princeton, 1981 ), p. 53.
J. Pešek, ‘Od středověkých bratrstev k moderním spolkům: Úvodní slovo v dvanacti bodech’, in: V. Ledvinka and J. Pešek (eds), Od středovékých bratrstev k moderním spolkům (Prague, 2000 ), p. 9;
P.M. Judson, ’ “Whether Race or Conviction Should be the Standard”: National Identity and Liberal Politics in nineteenth-century Austria’, Austrian History Yearbook 22 (1991), 76–95.
W. Hardtwig, ‘Strukturmerkmale und Entwicklungstendenzen des Vereinswesens in Deutschland 1789–1848’, and K. Tenfelde, ’Die Entfaltung des Vereinswesens während der industriellen Revolution in Deutschland (1850–1873)’ in: O. Dann (ed.), Vereinswesen und bürgerliche Gesellschaft in Deutschland (Munich, 1984 ), pp. 11–50 and 55–114; see also the essays in:
P. Urbanitsch and H. Stekl (eds), Kleinstadtbürgertum in der Habsburgermonarchie 1862–1914 (Vienna, 2000 ).
M. Lašt’ovka et al., Pražské spolky. Soupis pražských spolků na základě úředních evidencí z let 1895–1990 (Prague, 1998), p. vii. In 1856, there were 466 clubs in Bohemia; in 1867, 1,717; and in 1869, 2,651. By 1876, the total had grown to 4,476 (ibid., pp. xxxv-xxxvi).
P. Burian, ‘Das Vereinswesen in den böhmischen Ländern’, in: F. Seibt (ed.), Vereinswesen und Geschichtspflege in den böhmischen Ländern (Munich, 1986 ), pp. 39–51.
R.A. Krueger, ‘Mediating Progress in the Provinces: Central Authority, Local Elites, and Agrarian Societies in Bohemia and Moravia’, Austrian History Yearbook 35 (2004), 49–79, here 71.
Scholars are now careful to emphasize that Czech culture was in no sense suppressed altogether, contrary to what nationalist historians long argued. See: J. Petríň and L. Petráňová, ‘The White Mountain as a symbol in modern Czech history’, in: M. Teich (ed.), Bohemia in History (Cambridge, 1998 ), 143–63;
J. Rak, Bývali Čechové: České historické mýty a stereotypy (Jinočany, 1994 ), pp. 129–40;
J.F. Zacek, ‘Czech National Consciousness in the Baroque Era’, in: History of European Ideas 16 (1993), 935–41.
K. Sklenář, Obraz vlasti: Příběh Národního muzea (Prague-Litomyšl, 2001 ), p. 24.
On the patriotism of the nobility, see R. Luft, ‘Nationale Utraquisten in Böhmen: Zur Problematik “nationaler Zwischenstellungen” am Ende des 19. Jahrhunderts’, in: M. Godé et al. (eds), Allemands, Juifs et Tchècques en Prague/Deutsche, Juden und Tschechen in Prag 1890–1924: Actes du colloque international de Montpellier 8–10 décembre 1994 (Montpellier, 1996 ), pp. 37–51.
H. Agnew, Origins of the Czech National Renascence (Pittsburgh, 1993 ), p. 171.
M. Hroch, Social Preconditions of National Revival in Europe: A Comparative Analysis of the Social Composition of Patriotic Groups Among the Smaller European Nations (Cambridge, 1985 ).
M. Hroch, ‘The Social Composition of the Czech Patriots in Bohemia, 1827–1848’, in: P. Brock and H.G. Skilling (eds), The Czech Renascence of the Nineteenth Century (Toronto, 1970 ), pp. 33–52.
J. Polisenšký, ‘Historie, muzejnictví a Národní museum’, in: 150 let Národního muzea v Praze: Sborník přispěvků k jeho dějinám a významu (Prague, 1968 ), pp. 7–13.
Sklenář, Obraz vlasti, pp. 283–4; B. Garver, The Young Czech Party 1874–1901 and the Emergence of a Multi-Party System (New Haven, 1978 ), p. 123.
D. Düding, ‘Friedrich Ludwig Jahn und die Anfänge der deutschen Nationalbewegung’, in: H. Ueberhorst (ed.), Geschichte der Leibesübungen (Berlin, 1972–1982), Vol. 3/1, p. 232;
G. Mosse, The Nationalization of the Masses: Political Symbolism and Mass Movements in Germany from the Napoleonic Wars Through the Third Reich (New York, 1975 ), pp. 127–36.
D. Langewiesche, ’“… für Volk und Vaterland kräftig zu würken…”. Zur politischen und gesellschaftlichen Rolle der Turner zwischen 1811 und 1871’, in: O. Grupe (ed.), Kulturgut oder Körperkult?. Sport und Sportwissenschaft im Wandel (Tübingen, 1990), pp. 22–61;
D. Düding, ‘The Nineteenth-Century German Nationalist Movement as a Movement of Societies’, in: H. Schulze (ed.), Nation-Building in Central Europe (Leamington Spa, 1987 ), pp. 19–49.
B. Soukupová, ’České a německé spolky v Praze v 60. až 80. letech 19. století: Soužítí a kulturní výměna’, in: Pražané-jiní-druz-cizí, edited by the Institute for Ethnography and Folklore (Prague, 1992 ), pp. 10–18.
The splitting of military veterans associations into separate Czech and German organizations is described in: J. Pokorný, ’Čeští veterání v užší a širší vlasti’, in: Z. Hojda and R. Prahl (eds.), Český lev a rakouský orel v 19. století/Böhmischer Löwe and osterreichischer Adler im 19. Jahrhundert (Prague, 1996 ), pp. 120–24.
T.G. Masaryk, Česká otázka: Snahy a tužby národního obrození (Prague, 1895 ), p. 104.
For a more extensive discussion of Tyrs’ life, see: C.E. Nolte, The Sokol in the Czech Lands to 1914: Training for the Nation (Basingstoke, 2002 ), pp. 25–38.
F.L. Jahn and E. Eiselen, Die deutsche Turnkunst zur Einrichtung der Turnplätze (Berlin, 1816 ), p. 236.
As one scholar argues: ‘Each act was also a founding act. Possibly this played a role in the initial attraction of “Czech culture” for those born as Germans. To enter the Czech world gave them the opportunity, through their individual efforts, to change the whole in a fundamental way, to go down in history for all times.’ See: V. Macura, Masarykovy boty a jiné semi(o)fejetony (Prague, 1993 ), p. 12.
R. Tyršová, Jindřich Fügner: paměti a vzpomínky na mého otce (Prague, 1927), part 1, p. 19.
Fügner’s motives are explored further in: C.E. Nolte, ‘Choosing Czech Identity in Nineteenth-Century Prague: The Case of Jindřich Fügner’, Nationalities Papers 24 (1996), 51–62. See also, Luft, ‘Nationale Utraquisten in Böhmen’, here pp. 41–2.
P. Čornej, Lipanské ozvěny (Prague, 1995 ), pp. 49–103; P. Heumos, ‘Krise and hussitisches Ritual’, in: Seibt, Vereinswesen and Geschichtspflege, pp. 109–22.
M. Tyrš, ‘Tělocvik v ohledu esthetickém’, Sokol: Časopis věnovaný zájmům tělocvičným 3 (1873), pp. 2–3 and 25–6.
J. Křen, Kon fliktní společenství: Česi a Němci 1780–1918 (Prague, 1990), pp. 36, 38, and 482.
This criticism was levelled at the Prague contingent at a Congress of Germans from Bohemia held in Teplice in August 1848, because they had boycotted the elections to the Frankfurt Parliament. See: J. Havránek, ‘The Development of Czech Nationalism’, Austrian History Yearbook, 3/2 (1967), 223–60.
J. Novotný, ‘Kasino a pražské německé elity do první světové války’, in: O. Fejtová et al. (eds), Národnostní skupiny, menšiny a cizinci ve městech: Praha; Město spráy a zpravodajství (Prague, 2001 ), pp. 135–6.
Franz Spina, ‘Aus dem Bildungs- und Wirtschaftsleben der Tschechen I: Das Sokolwesen’, Deutsche Arbeit 13 (1913–14), p. 354.
Quoted in: E. Rychnovsky, Der deutsche Turnverein in Prag, 1862–1912 (Prague, 1912 ), p. 24. Police authorities stopped this message from being delivered.
F.L. Jahn, Deutsches Volkstum (Lübeck, 1810 ), p. 337.
On these festivals, see: H. Neumann, Deutsche Turnfeste: Spiegelbild der deutschen Turnbewegung (Bad Homburg, 1985 );
K. Zieschang, Vom Schützenfest zum Turnfest: Die Entstehung des Deutschen Turnfestes under besonderer Berücksichtigung des Einflusses vom F.L. Jahn (Ahrensburg, 1977 ).
H. Ueberhorst, Friedrich Ludwig Jahn and His Time, 1778–1852 (Munich, 1978 ), p. 56.
On the impact of these celebrations, see Mosse, The Nationalization of the Masses, pp. 47–72; P. Wittlich, ‘Sochářství’, in: E. Poche et al. (ed.), Praha nátrodního probuzení (Prague, 1980 ), pp. 225–6;
Z. Hojda and J. Pokorný, Pomníky a zapomníky (2nd edn, Prague-Litomyšl, 1997 ), pp. 16–18.
Z. Nejedlý, ‘Dějiny pražského Hlaholu, 1861–1911’, in: R. Lichtner (ed.), Památník zpěváckého spolku Hlaholu v Praze, vydaný na oslavu 50tileté činnosti, 1861–1911 (Prague, 1911 ), p. 18.
F. Hirth and A. Kießlich, Geschichte des Turnkreises Deutschösterreich (TeplitzSchönau, 1928 ), pp. 175–311;
E. Mehl, ‘Deutsches Turnen, seine Vorläufer und seine Begleiter in den Länder der böhmischen Krone von den Anfängen bis 1918’, in: R. Jahn (ed.), Sudetendeutsches Turnertum (Frankfurt a.M., 1958 ), pp. 83–93.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2007 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Nolte, C. (2007). Voluntary Associations and Nation-building in Nineteenth-century Prague. In: Cole, L. (eds) Different Paths to the Nation. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230801424_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230801424_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-27960-9
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-80142-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)