Abstract
I began this inquiry by indicating a desire to put some answers to two questions that are fundamental to the job of theorizing about civil association: First, under what conditions, if any, is it possible for human beings holding disparate, conflicting, and perhaps even hostile beliefs and viewpoints to live together peaceably within a common polity? Second, and assuming a reasonably positive answer to the first question, is it possible to hope for something more in this regard than simply peaceful coexistence? It would perhaps be good, by way of conclusion, to summarize the answers that have been put to these questions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Michael J. White, Partisan or Neutral (London: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 1995), p. 2.
Natural-law argument seems almost infinitely expandable in this regard. Cf. David Braybrooke, Natural Law Modernized (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2001).
Copyright information
© 2006 Craig L. Carr
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Carr, C.L. (2006). Epilogue. In: The Liberal Polity. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230800816_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230800816_8
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-28572-3
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-80081-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Religion & Philosophy CollectionPhilosophy and Religion (R0)