Abstract
This section is intended for those readers largely unfamiliar with Bradley’s work, so that those to whom this description does not apply may move immediately to the one following.
‘I made little of [my father’s philosophy books], but I remember in particular Bradley’s [ppearance and Reality. The work bewildered me; there were hardly any words I did not know, and the sentences were simply constructed, but I could not tell what it all meant. However, I formed the general impression that the author was a wicked man who worshipped a false God called the Absolute … My adult views of Bradley are not so very different. Reading a few pages of [ppearance and Reality now makes me feel as if I had drunk several pints of beer …’
Peter Geach, ‘A Philosophical Autobiography’, in Lewis (1991), pp. 2–3
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
For examples of each, see Leibniz’s [iscourse on Metaphysics, and Reinhardt Grossmann, [einong (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1974).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2007 Stewart Candlish
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Candlish, S. (2007). Finding a Way into Bradley’s Metaphysics. In: The Russell/Bradley Dispute and its Significance for Twentieth-Century Philosophy. History of Analytic Philosophy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230800618_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230800618_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-230-23051-4
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-80061-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave Religion & Philosophy CollectionPhilosophy and Religion (R0)