Abstract
Schutz is famous for his synthesis of Husserl and Weber. But as Christopher Prendergast notes, Schutz did not engage in “some abstract and unmotivated attempt to ‘synthesize’ Weber and Husserl” (1986, p. 1). Schutz’s motive was to shore up the methodological defenses of the Austrian school of economics. Prendergast describes Schutz as “committed” to the “overall methodological standpoint” of the Austrian school (1986, p. 3). The “titular head” of the school was Ludwig von Mises (1986, p. 6). The seminar Mises ran from his office in the Austrian Chamber of Commerce was “the prime vehicle for forging and maintaining the distinctive theoretical, philosophical, and policy tradition of Austrian marginalism” (1986, p. 6). The Mises Circle was the main element of the “inner circle” of Schutz’s audience (1986, p. 5). Schutz thought that Mises’ methodology lacked a satisfactory theory of intersubjective understanding (1986, p. 11).
Parts of this chapter draw on Koppl (1997) and Koppl (2001).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2002 Roger Koppl
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Koppl, R. (2002). Schutz. In: Big Players and the Economic Theory of Expectations. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230629240_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230629240_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-39968-0
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-62924-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)