Skip to main content

The EU versus the IASB versus the USA

  • Chapter
European Financial Reporting
  • 202 Accesses

Abstract

The two preceding chapters have introduced two organisations which are involved in setting rules for the financial reporting of European enterprises: the EU through its directives and the IASB through its International Accounting Standards. This chapter introduces a third actor: the USA. It explains why the American rules (United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles — always abbreviated to US GAAP) represent a possible alternative for the financial reporting of European enterprises. The existence of three possible sources of the rules for European enterprises makes the study of European financial reporting extremely interesting but also rather complicated. This chapter explores these complications, by analysing how the relationships between the three actors, the EU, the IASB and the USA, have developed in recent years. First it seeks to explain why the rules of a foreign country in a different continent should be of any relevance for European enterprises.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Cairns, D. (2000). ‘Waving a difference’. Accountancy (September).

    Google Scholar 

  • Delesalle, E. (2002). ‘Le point sur les réformes comptables en cours’. La comptabilité en mouvement. Paris, L’ordre des experts comptables.

    Google Scholar 

  • EU (2002). Regulation (EC) No 1606/2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (1995). Accounting Harmonization: A New Strategy vis-à-vis International Harmonization. Brussels, European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flower, J. and Ebbers, G. (2002). Global Financial Reporting. Basingstoke, Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fortune (2003). ‘The Global 500’. Fortune (July 28).

    Google Scholar 

  • House, J. (2001). ‘Along the rocky road’. Accountancy (October).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jermakowicz, E. and Gornik-Tomaszewski, S. (2003). The impact of international financial reporting standards on US GAAP, paper presented at the EIASM workshop on implementing IFRS, Brussels, 11–12 September 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, P., Redding, R. and Bahnson (1998). The FASB: The People, the Process and the Politics. Boston, McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitt, H. (2002). ‘US shares common aim of one set of standards’. Accountancy (November).

    Google Scholar 

  • SEC (2000). Concept Release on International Accounting Standards. Washington, SEC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeff, S. (1997). ‘Playing the Congressional card on employee stock options’. The Development of Accounting in an International Context. T. Cooke and C. Nobes. London, Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeff, S. (2000). ‘What is the SEC looking for?’. World Accounting Report (April).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2004 John Flower

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Flower, J. (2004). The EU versus the IASB versus the USA. In: European Financial Reporting. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230628106_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics