Abstract
The experience of studying the Canterbury Tales (the text on which I will concentrate in this essay) involves historical discovery, philosophical seriousness, emotional engagement, and, often, spontaneous laughter. A good deal of historical groundwork is necessary to prevent this many-faceted text from being a mere relic from the past, charming perhaps, but quaint. Such historical inquiry itself affords the pleasure of intuiting how the tales speak to one another, to the fiction as a whole, and to the culture from and for which the text was first written. Yet the philosophical issues it raises, often lightheartedly, are still being pondered, though in somewhat different formulations. Attention to the Canterbury Tales as art discloses even more immediate pleasures, since art seems to defy time, facing readers directly and challenging their sense of the world and place in it. Of all pre-modern writing, except Shakespeare’s, the Canterbury Tales seems most likely to confront students in this direct way. The intellectual pleasures and profits involved in a Chaucer course are inextricably entwined—you can’t learn from Chaucer’s work without having fun, and you can’t have fun without exploring the complexities of Chaucer’s representation of felt life in late medieval England.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Works cited
Abelard, Peter. The Story of Abelard’s Adversities, trans. J. T. Muckle. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies, 1964
Augustine. Confessions, trans. John K. Ryan. Garden City, New York: Doubleday, 1960
Bergson, Henri (1912). Laughter: An Essay on the Meaning of the Comic, trans. Cloudesley Brerston and Fred Rothwell. New York: Macmillan
Bloch, Howard (Fall 1989). “Chaucer’s Maiden’s Head: The Physician’s Tale and the Poetics of Virginity”, Representations, 28: 113–34
Carruthers, Mary (1979). “The Wife of Bath and the Painting of Lions”, Publications of the Modern Language Association of America, 94: 209–22
Carruthers, Mary. (1990). The Book of Memory: A Study of Memory in Medieval Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Dinshaw, Carolyn (1989). Chaucer’s Sexual Poetics. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press
Ellis, Steve, ed. (1998). Chaucer: The Canterbury Tales. London and New York: Longman
Fletcher, Angus (1964). Allegory: The Theory of a Symbolic Mode. Ithaca: Cornell University Press
Freud, Sigmund (1960). Jokes and their Relation to the Unconscious, Standard Edition, vol. 8 (1905), trans. James Strachey. London: Hogarth Press
Frye, Northrop (1957). Anatomy of Criticism, Four Essays. Princeton: Princeton University Press
Gadamer, Hans-Georg (1976). Philosophical Hermeneutics, trans. and ed. David E. Linge. Berkeley: University of California Press. The essay was originally published in 1964
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. (2003). Truth and Method, 2nd revsd edn, trans. Joel Weinsheimer and Donald Marshall. New York and London: Continuum Books
Greenblatt, Stephen (1988). Shakespearean Negotiations. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California
Greenblatt, Stephen. (1995). “Culture”, in Terms for Literary Study, ed. Frank Lentricchia & Thomas McLaughlin. Chicago: Chicago University Press
Jauss, Hans Robert (1989). Question and Answer: Forms of Dialogic Understanding, trans. and ed. Michael Hays. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press
Kant, Emmanuel (1952). Critique of Judgement, trans. James Creed Meredith. Oxford: Clarendon Press
Knapp, Peggy A. (Fall 2000). “The Work of Alchemy”, Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies, 30: 575–99
Leicester, H. Marshall (1998). “Structure as Deconstruction”, in Chaucer: The Canterbury Tales, ed. Ellis. London and New York: Longman: pp. 23–41
Middle English Dictionary (1952–2001). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press
Miller, Mark (2000). “Naturalism and its Discontents”, English Literary History, 67: 1–44
Oizumi, Akio (1991). A Complete Concordance to the Works of Geoffrey Chaucer. Amsterdam: Hildesheim
Owst, G. R. (1933). Literature and the Pulpit in Medieval England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Oxford English Dictionary (1989) 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Patterson, Lee (1998). “The Subject of Confession: The Pardoner and the Rhetoric of Penance”, in Chaucer: The Canterbury Tales, ed. Ellis. London and New York: Longman: pp. 169–88
Robertson Jr, D. W. (1962). A Preface to Chaucer. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
Scanlon, Larry (1989). “The Authority of Fable: Allegory and Irony in the Nun’s Priest’s Tale”, Exemplaria, 1: 43–68
Williams, Raymond (1977). Marxism and Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2007 contributors
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Knapp, P.A. (2007). Chaucer for Fun and Profit. In: Ashton, G., Sylvester, L. (eds) Teaching Chaucer. Teaching the New English. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230627512_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230627512_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4039-8827-0
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-62751-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)