Skip to main content

Assessment and Alternative Proposals on European Structural Policies: Why It Is Right to Support both the Common Agricultural Policy and Research and Innovation Policy

  • Chapter
  • 88 Accesses

Part of the book series: International Papers in Political Economy Series ((IPPE))

Abstract

The British Prime Minister Tony Blair has recently put in the centre of the debate on European economic policy the question of the place of the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) which would represent a too important share of the European budget while, at the same time, almost no support would be given to the research and innovation policy. It would be a policy of the past incapable to face the main issues of the future. Agriculture policy might be renationalised to devote most of the European Union (EU) budget to the policy more turned towards research and innovation. The debate is welcomed but the British position is too simplistic.

Structural policies are not reduced to CAP and innovation policy. Regional policy is a matter of concern, and also are competition policy which plays a dominant role, industrial policy which is almost inexistent at the European level and trade policy which has been at the origin of the European construction but is now inscribed in the WTO framework. A critical assessment of the policies followed in these fields at the European level since the 1980s will be made in Section 2. Alternatives proposals will follow in Section 3, showing how it is possible and necessary to conciliate CAP and innovation policy with other structural interventions. The proposed measures make up a coherent programme.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • G. Allaire and T. Dupeuple (2003), ‘De la multifonctionnalité de l’activité agricole à la multi-évaluation de la production agricole’, Economie Rurale, 275, juin, pp.51–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • I. Begg (2002), ‘Regional policy in Europe under EMU’, Thematic network EPOC, Workshop Bremen, March.

    Google Scholar 

  • J.M. Boussard (2003), ‘Commerce, développement et volatilité des prix agricoles’, mimeo, INRA.

    Google Scholar 

  • J.M. Boussard (1996), ‘When risk generates chaos’, Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization, 29 (96/05), pp. 433–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. Burton (1993), ‘Some illustration of chaos in commodity models’, Journal of Agricultural Economics, 44(1), pp. 38–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. Cappelen, J. Fagerberg and B. Verspagen (1999), ‘Lack of regional convergence’ in J. Fagerberg et al. (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  • J.Y. Carfantan (2002), La mondialisation déloyale (Fayard).

    Google Scholar 

  • J.P. Cling, E.M. Mouhoud and J. Capdeviel (2003), `Normes sociales: quelles propositions avancer?’ mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Cohen and J.H. Lorenzi (2000), Politiques industrielles pour l’Europe Rapport du Conseil d’Analyse Economique (La Documentation Française).

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Coriat (2002), ‘Le nouveau régime américain de la propriété intellectuelle’, Revue d’Economie Industrielle, 99, 2ème trimestre, pp. 17–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Cour and L. Nayman (1999), ‘Fonds structurels et disparités régionales en Europe’, Lettre du CEPII, 177 (mars).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (1993), White book on growth, competitiveness and employment.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (1994a), Industrial competitiveness policy for the EU.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (1994b), Industrial policy in an open and competitive environment Communication Bangeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2002) Cohesion report.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Fagerberg, P. Guerrieri and B. Verspagen (1999), The economic challenge for Europe, Cheltenham, UK, Northampton, MA, USA, Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Fontagné and S. Jean (2003), ‘OMC: bas de cycle’, La lettre du CEPII, 226 (septembre) pp. 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Jennar (2003), ‘Les pièges de l’Accord général sur le commerce et les services’, Oxfam, février Série AGCS, 1, pp. 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Lallement, E.M. Mouhoud and S. Paillard (2002), ‘Polarisation et internationalisation des activités d’innovation: incidences sur la spécialisation technologique des nations, Région et développement, 16, pp. 125–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Martin (1999), ‘Public policies, regional inequalities and growth’, Journal of Public Economics, 73, pp. 85–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • T. Pouch (2003), ‘La PAC et 1’OMC: éléments de cadrage’, Université de Marne la Vallée, OEP.

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Pouch and C. de Lorgeril (2004) ‘La dynamique des échanges de produits agroalimentaires (1967–2000)’, Economie et Sociétés AG, 26, mars, pp. 507–529.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Sapir (2003), An agenda for a growing Europe Report to the President of the European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Philip Arestis Malcolm Sawyer

Copyright information

© 2006 Jacques Mazier

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mazier, J. (2006). Assessment and Alternative Proposals on European Structural Policies: Why It Is Right to Support both the Common Agricultural Policy and Research and Innovation Policy. In: Arestis, P., Sawyer, M. (eds) Alternative Perspectives on Economic Policies in the European Union. International Papers in Political Economy Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230627352_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics