Abstract
The politics of immigration in Britain and France now constitute interesting examples of the scope, reach, potential, and limits of European integration. There is something new here and the European Union (EU) could be largely ignored in what were essentially domestic debates about immigration and its effects on the two societies. The EU’s reach into these issues could be seen as surprising because immigration issues combine symbolic resonance with high levels of political sensitivity. In the words of Stanley Hoffmann (1966), states may well be loath to expose to the supranational method issues such as immigration and immigrant politics that are closely linked to their identities as states. If they were to play this dangerous game of Russian roulette, as Hoffmann put it, they would do so only if the gun was filled with blanks. European integration would thus be more likely to occur when it sustained and fortified state identities rather than undermining and eroding them.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Brubaker, R., ‘The Return of Assimilation? Changing Perspectives on Immigration and its Sequels in France, Germany and the United States’, Ethnic and Racial Studies, 24:4 (2001): 531–48.
Buller, J., and Gamble, A., ‘Conceptualizing Europeanization’, Public Policy and Administration, 17:2 (20C2): 4–24.
Buzan, B, ‘The level of analysis problem in international relations reconsidered’ in Booth, K., and Smith, S. (eds), International Relations Theory Today (Cambridge: Polity, 1995).
Calvès, G., ‘ “Il n’y a pas de race ici”: le modèle français à l’épreuve de l’intégration européenne’, Critique Internationale, 17 (2002): 173–86.
Chopin, I., Campaigning against Racism and Xenophobia: From a Legislative Perspective at European Level (Brussels: European Network Against Racism, 1999).
Chopin, I., Cormack, J., and Niessen, J. The Implementation of European Anti-Discrimination Legislation: Work in Progress (Brussels: Migration Policy Group, 2004).
Danese, G., ‘Transnational Collective Action in Europe: The Case of Migrants in Italy and Spain’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 24:4 (1998): 613–25.
Dolowitzm D., and Marsh, D., ‘Who Learns What from Whom?’ A Review of the Policy Transfer Literature’, Political Studies, 44:2 (1996): 343–57.
Dyson, K., ‘EMU as Europeanization: Convergence, Diversity and Contingency’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 38:4 (2000): 645–66.
ECRI, A Basket of Good Practices (Strasbourg: Council of Europe, 1995).
Favell, A., Philosophies of Integration: Immigration and the Idea of Citizenship in Britain and France (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2001).
Foreign and Commonwealth Office, Partnership of Nations: The British Approach to the European Union Intergovernmental Conference 1996 (London: HMSO, 1996).
Freeman, G., ‘Modes of Immigration Politics in Liberal States’, International Migration Review, 29:4 (1995): 881–913.
Geddes, A., Immigration and European Integration: Towards Fortress Europe? (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2000).
Geddes, A., The European Union and British Politics (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004).
Geddes, A., ‘Getting the Best of Both Worlds: Britain, the EU and Migration Policy’, International Affairs, 81:4 (2005): 723–40.
Geddes, A., and Guiraudon, V., ‘Britain and France and EU Anti-Discrimination Policy: The Emergence of an EU Policy Paradigm’, West European Politics, 27:2 (2004): 334–53.
George, S., An Awkward Partner: Britain in the European Union (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998).
Gerring, J., ‘What Makes a Concept Good: A Critical Framework for Understanding Concept Formation in the Social Sciences’, Polity, 31:3 (1999): 357–93.
Goffman, E., Frame Analysis (New York: Harper, 1974).
Groenendijk, K., ‘Legal Concepts of Integration in EU Migration Law’, European Journal of Migration and Law, 6:2 (2004): 111–26.
Guiraudon, V., ‘European Integration and Migration Policy: Vertical Policy-Making as Venue Shopping’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 27:2 (2001): 334–53.
Guiraudon, V., ‘Immigration Policy and Politics’, in A. Cole, P. Le Gales, and J. Levy (eds), Developments in French Politics (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005).
Hoffman, S., ‘Obstinate or Obsolete? The Fate of the Nation State and the Case of Western Europe’, Deadalus, 95: 3 (1966): 862–915.
Hollifield, J., Immigrants, States and Markets: The Political Economy of Migration in Europe (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1992).
House of Lords, EU Proposals to Combat Discrimination (London: House of Lords, 1999).
Knill, C., ‘Cross-National Policy Convergence: Concepts, Approaches and Explanatory Factors’, Journal of European Public Policy, 12:5 (2005): 764–74.
Knill, C., and Lehmkuhl D., ‘How Europe Matters: Different Mechanisms of Europeanization’, European Integration On-Line Papers, 3 (1999): http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/1999-007a.htm
Kretzschmar, C., Ebermeyer, S., and Dehoumon, M., ‘Discrimination Based on Racial and Ethnic Origin: France’ in Chopin, I., Cormack, J., and Niessen, J. (eds), The Implementation of European Anti-Discrimination Legislation (Brussels: Migration Policy Group, 2004).
McCrudden, C. ‘Thinking about the Discrimination Directives’, European Anti-Discrimination Law Review 1 (2005): 17–23.
Moravscik, A., ‘Preferences and Power in the European Community: A Liberal Intergovernmentalist Approach’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 31:4 (1993): 473–524.
Migration Policy Group, European Anti-Discrimination Law Review, 2 (2005).
Putnam, R., ‘Diplomacy and domestic policies: the logic of two-level games’, International Organization, 42: 3 (1988): 427–60.
Radaelli, C., ‘Whither Europeanization: Concept Stretching and Substantive Change’, European Integration On-Line Papers, 4:8 (2000): http://eiop.or.at/ eiop/texte/2000-008a.htm
Ruggie, J., Constructing the World Polity (London: Routledge, 1998).
Sartori, G., ‘Concept Misinformation in Comparative Politics’, American Political Science Review, 64:4 (1970): 1033–53.
Singer, J., ‘The Level of Analysis Problem in International Relations’, in J. Roseneau (ed.), International Politics and Foreign Policy (New York: Free Press, 1969).
Tyson, A., ‘The Negotiation of the European Community Directive on Anti-Discrimination’, European Journal of Migration and Law, 3:2 (2001): 199–229.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2007 Christophe Bertossi
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Geddes, A., Guiraudon, V. (2007). The Europeanization of Anti-Discrimination in Britain and France. In: Bertossi, C. (eds) European Anti-Discrimination and the Politics of Citizenship. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230627314_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230627314_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-54412-7
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-62731-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social & Cultural Studies CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)