Abstract
We know why nations trade with and invest in each other. We also know why trade liberalization is beneficial to all trading partners. However, it is still worthwhile to ask why we should promote regional economic integration in an age of globalization. To answer this question, we should also ask whether there is an underlined ‘law of movement’ consisting of the interactions of economic forces, which will more or less inevitably lead to regional economic integration in a given region; or whether regional economic integration is simply a result of conscientious efforts made by related countries. The theory of economic geography developed by Krugman, Fujita and Venables seems to have provided a general answer to the question. The key element of the answer is that distance matters. According to Krugman, the importance of distance, and the success of gravity models, explains the rapid growth of trade among East Asian economies, and particularly Asian trade with China. According to the theory of economic geography, if two economies grow fast, their mutual trade will grow very fast. And if they are relatively close geographically, their mutual trade will quickly become a major part of world trade, whether or not there are any special affinities or links (Krugman, 2004).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Akamatsu, K. (1943) ‘Shinkou Kogyokoku no Sangyo Hatten’ (Industrial Development in Newly Industrializing Countries), in Ueda Teijiro-hakusi Kinen Ronbunshu (Essays in Honor to Dr Teijiro Ueda), Kagakushugi Kogyosha, Tokyo, Vol. 4.
Ando, M. and F. Kimura (2003) ‘Formation of production and distribution networks in East Asia’, NBER annual East Asia conference.
Athukorala, P.-C. (2003) ‘Product fragmentation and trade pattern in East Asia’, Trade and Development discussion paper 2003/21, Division of Economics, Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, The Australian National University, Canberra.
Lee, Chang Jae, ‘Rationale for institutionalizing North East Asian economic cooperation and some possible options’, in Strengthening Economic Cooperation in Northeast Asia, Korea Institute of International Economic Policy (KIEP), September 2004, pp. 16–45.
Deardorff, A. V. (1998) ‘Fragmentation in simple trade models’, Paper 98–11, Michigan: Center for Research on Economic & Social Theory.
Development Research Centre of the State Council (2003) ‘Analysis of China’s processing trade and industrialization’, Economic Reference Materials, 6 (www.drc.gov.cn).
Frankel, J. A. and A. K. Rose (1996) ‘Economic structure and the decision to adopt a common currency’, CIDER Working Paper No. C96–073, University of California at Berkley.
Fukao, K. H. Ishido and K. Ito (2003) ‘Vertical intra-industrial trade and direct investment in East Asia’, RIETI discussion paper 03-E-001.
Kiss, E. F. (2000) Optimum Currency Area: Euro as a Practical Paradigm? Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey.
Kojima, K. (1973) ‘Reorganization of north-south trade: Japanese model of multi- national business operation’, Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics, 13 (2), 1–28.
Krugman, P. (2004) ‘The “new” economic geography: where are we?’, Paper presented at the IED-JETRO symposium, 26 November.
Kuroda, K. (2000) The Rise of China and the Changing Industrial Map of Asia, Japan Economic Foundation.
McKinnon, R. I. (1998) ‘Exchange rate coordination for surmounting the East Asian currency crisis’, Asian Economic Journal, 12(4), December.
McKinnon, R. I. (2000) ‘After the crisis, the East Asian dollar standard resurrected: An interpretation of high-frequency exchange rate pegging’, Economic Department, Stanford University, online at: mckinnon@leland.stanford.edu
McKinnon, R. I. and K. Ohno (1997) Dollar and Yen, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Radelet, S. and J. D. Sachs (1998) ‘The East Asian financial crisis: Diagnoses, remedies, prospects’, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 1.
Sakakibara, E. and S. Yamakawa (2004) ‘Market-driven regional integration in East Asia’, Paper for the workshop on ’Regional economic integration in a global framework’, 22–23 September, Beijing.
The Nikkei Weekly (2001) ‘PC makers rethink as slowdown hits’, The Nikkei Weekly, 23 July, p. 18.
Trivisvavet, T. (2001) ‘Do East Asian countries constitute an optimum currency area?’, Durham University. April.
UNCTAD (2001) Trade and Development Report, 2001, Geneva: UNCTAD.
Vernon, R. (1964) ‘International investment and international trade in the product cycle’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 80 (2), 190–207.
Yamazawa, I. (1990) ‘Economic development and international trade’, East-West Center, RSI, Hawaii.
Yu, Y. (2000) ‘China’s deflation during the Asian financial crisis, and reform of the international financial system’, Asian Economic Bulletin 17(2), August, 163–74.
Yu, Y. (2000) ‘China: The case for capital controls’, in W. Bello, N. Bullard and K. Malhotra (eds), Global Finance, London and New York: Zed Books, 177–87.
Zhang, Z. (2000) ‘Exchange rate reform in China: An experiment in the real targets approach’, The World Economy, 23(8), 1057–82, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2007 Institute of Developing Economies (IDE), JETRO
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Yongding, Y. (2007). Regional Integration from a Chinese Perspective. In: Fujita, M. (eds) Regional Integration in East Asia. IDE-JETRO Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230626607_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230626607_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-28522-8
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-62660-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)