Skip to main content

The Determinants of Domestic and Foreign Biases: An Empirical Study

  • Chapter
Asset Allocation and International Investments

Part of the book series: Finance and Capital Markets Series ((FCMS))

Abstract

The international capital asset pricing model (ICAPM), based on traditional portfolio theory developed by Sharpe (1964) and Lintner (1965), suggests that, to maximize risk-adjusted returns, investors should hold a world market portfolio of risky assets. However, domestic assets are heavily weighted in investors’ portfolios even after the relaxing of capital control after 1980. For example, in 1997, 89.9 percent of US investors’ equity portfolios were domestic equities, while the size of the USA in world market capitalization was about 48.3 percent (Ahearne et al., 2004). The wide disparity between actual and recommended international equity portfolio weights constitutes the equity home bias, one of the unresolved puzzles in international finance literature.1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ahearn, A., Griever W. and Warnock F. (2004) “Information Costs and Home Bias: An Analysis of US Holding of Foreign Equities”, Journal of International Economics, 62 (2): 313–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartram, S. M. and Dufey, G. (2001) “International Portfolio Investment: Theory, Evidence and Institutional Framework”, Financial Market Institutions & Instruments, 10 (3): 85–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, F. (1974) “International Capital Market Equilibrium with Investment Barriers”, Journal of Financial Economics, 1 (4): 337–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohn, H. and Tesar, L. (1996) “US Equity Investment in Foreign Markets: Portfolio Rebalancing or Return Chasing”, American Economic Review, 86 (2): 77–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmichael, B. and Coen, A. (2003) “International Portfolio Choice in an Overlapping Generations Model with Transaction Costs”, Economic Letters, 80 (2): 269–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Central Intelligence agency (2001) The world factbook (Potomac Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, K., Covrig, V. and Ng, K. (2005) “What Determines the Domestic Bias and Foreign Bias? Evidence from Mutual Fund Equity Allocations Worldwide”, Journal of Finance, 60 (3): 1495–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, I. and Kaplanis, E. (1986) “Costs to Cross Border Investment and International Equity Market Equilibrium”, in J. Edwards, J. Franks, C. Mayer and S. Schaefer (eds) Recent Developments in Corporate Finance (Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlquist, M., Pinkowitz, L., Stulz, M. and Williamson, R. (2003) “Corporate Governance and the Home Bias”, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 38 (1): 87–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edison, H. and Warnock, F. (2003) “A Simple Measure of the Intensity of Capital Controls”, Journal of Empirical Finance, 10 (1–2): 81–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faruqee, H., Li Sh. and Yan I. (2004) “The Determinants of International Portfolio Holdings and Home Bias”, Working Paper, WPLO4/34.

    Google Scholar 

  • French, K. and Poterba, J. (1991) “Investor Diversification and International Equity Markets”, American Economic Review, 81 (2): 222–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gehrig, T. (1993) “An Information Based Explanation of the Domestic Bias in International Equity Investment”, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 95 (1): 97–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giannetti, M. and Koskinen, Y. (2004) “Investor Protection and the Demand for Equity”, SSE/EFI Working Paper, Series in Economics and Finance, n. 526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glassman, D. A. and Riddick, L.A. (1996) “Why Empirical International Portfolio Models Fail: Evidence that Model Misspecification Creates Home Bias”, Journal of International Money and Finance, 15 (2): 275–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huberman, G. (2001) “Familiarity Breeds Investment”, Review of Financial Studies, 14 (3): 659–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karolyi, A. and Stulz, R. (2003) “Are Financial Assets Priced Locally or Globally?”, in G. Constantinides, M. Harris, and R. M. Stulz (eds), Handbook of the Economics of Finance, ( Amsterdam: North-Holland ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilka, M. and Weber, M. (2000) “Home Bias in International Stock Return Expectations”, Journal of Psychology and Financial Markets, 1 (3–4): 176–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • La Porta, R., Lopez-De-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R. (1997) “Legal Determinants of External Finance”, Journal of Finance, 52 (3): 1131–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • La Porta, R., Lopez-De-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R. (1998) “Law and Finance”, Journal of Political Economy, 106 (6): 1113–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • La Porta, R., Lopez-De-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R. (2000) “Investor Protection and Corporate Governance”, Journal of Financial Economic, 58 (1–2): 3–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, K. (1999) “Trying to Explain Home Bias in Equities and Consumption”, Journal of Economic Literature, 37 (2): 571–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lintner, J. (1965) “The Valuation of Risky Assets and the Selection of Risky Investments in Stock Portfolio and Capital Budgets”, Review of Economics and Statistics, 47 (1): 13–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Portes, R. and Rey, H. (2005) “The Determinants of Cross-Border Equity Flows”, Journal of International Economics, 65 (2): 269–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkissan, S. and Schill, M. (2004) “The Overseas Listing Decision: New Evidence of Proximity Preference”, Review of Financial Studies, 17 (3): 769–809.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe, W. F. (1964) “Capital Asset Prices: A Theory of Market Equilibrium under the Condition of Risk”, Journal of Finance, 19 (3): 425–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strong, N. and Xu, X. (2003) “Understanding the Equity Home Bias: Evidence from Survey Data”, Review of Economics and Statistics, 85 (2): 307–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stulz, R. M. (1981) “On the Effect of Barriers to International Investment”, Journal of Finance, 36 (4): 923–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tesar, L. and Werner, I. (1995) “Home Bias and High Turnover”, Journal of International Money and Finance, 14 (4): 467–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, C. (1998) “Dynamic Portfolio Choice and Asset Pricing with Differential Information”, Journal of Economic Dynamic and Control, 22 (7): 1027–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2007 Fathi Abid and Slah Bahloul

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Abid, F., Bahloul, S. (2007). The Determinants of Domestic and Foreign Biases: An Empirical Study. In: Gregoriou, G.N. (eds) Asset Allocation and International Investments. Finance and Capital Markets Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230626515_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics