Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Finance and Capital Markets Series ((FCMS))

  • 426 Accesses

Abstract

Codes of best practice originated in the early 1990s in the United Kingdom, the United States and Canada on account of a perceived lack of board oversight on effective corporate performance of leading companies. The Cadbury Report in the UK, the General Motors Board of Directors Guidelines in the USA, and the Dey Report in Canada have each proved influential sources for other guideline and code efforts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adams, R.B., Almeida, H. and Ferreira, D. (2003) “Understanding the Relationship Between Founder-CEOs and Firm Performance”, ECGI Finance Working Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, G. (January 12, 2004 ) “Corporate Governance as a Factor in Mutual Funds Holdings”, a Joint Research by Governance Metrics International — A Governance Rating Agency, and LIPPER — A Leading Global Provider of Research on Mutual Funds, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denis, D.K. and McConnell, J.J. (2003) “International Corporate Governance”, ECGI Finance Working Paper No. 05 /2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franks, J., Mayer, C. and Rossi, S. (2003) “Ownership: Evolution and Regulation”, ECGI Finance Working Paper No. 09 /2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glater, J.D. (April 17, 2005 ) “Here it Comes: The Sarbanes—Oxley Backlash, a Report on Survey of 90 Clients of Big Four Accounting Firms — Deloitte”, E & Y, KPMG, and PWH Coopers (The New York Times).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, H.J. (2000) “International Comparison of Corporate Governance Guidelines and Codes of Best Practices — Developing and Emerging Markets”.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertig, G. (2005) “On-Going Board Reforms: One-Size-Fits-All and Regulatory Capture”, ECGI-Law Working Paper No. 25 /2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, H.M. and Panunzi, E (2003) “Tender Offers and Leverage”, ECGI — Finance, Working Paper No. 22 /2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romano, R. (2004) “The Sarbanes—Oxley Act and the Making of Quack Corporate Governance”, Yale Law & Econ Research Paper 297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidel, R. (April 1, 2002 ) “Staggered Terms for Boards Erode Shareholder Value”, The Wall Street Journal.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2007 Muhammad Akbar Saeed and Nadeem A. Syed

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Saeed, M.A., Syed, N.A. (2007). Corporate Governance of Mutual Funds in Pakistan. In: Gregoriou, G.N. (eds) Diversification and Portfolio Management of Mutual Funds. Finance and Capital Markets Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230626508_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics