Abstract
The theory of social dialogue and practice of public engagement are founded on democratic ideals of participation that remain elusive, despite a connection with established principles of Western democracy, a century of social science enquiry and more recently the growing practice of corporate stakeholder consultation. In theory and practice, dialogues are difficult to characterize and actual evidence for their effectiveness is difficult to separate from interrelated drivers of change. As the explicit communication technique behind many newly minted statements of corporate social responsibility, the latest practice of social dialogue appears too weak to maintain the questioning attitude that dialogue implies. This chapter draws on Jurgen Habermas’s (1968, 1984, 1987) discourse ethics and some original research techniques to assess the controversial issues behind corporate dialogue practice. We conclude that new forms of public consultation offer some promise of change by employing democratic communication processes implied in dialogue and through this a promise to further restore fundamental human rights, or at least the values that lead and protect them. To restore freedoms and define new rights through dialogue is a practice to be welcomed, even while practitioners are challenged to prove the ability of dialogue to deliver such promise. Still, where claims for dialogue are insufficiently evidenced, or imbalanced by inappropriate power relations, public consultation may be considered not as a liberating, democratic communication technique but merely an extension of the power, privilege and control that mark many forms of Western political and economic activity and their miscommunication.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Alia, V. (2004) Media Ethics and Social Change (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press).
Apel, K. O. (1980) The A Priori of the Communication Community and the Foundation of Ethics: The Problem of a Rational Foundation of Ethics in the Scientific age. In towards a Transformation of Philosophy (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul).
Argyris, C. (1990) Overcoming Organizational Defences (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall).
Barber, B. (1988) The Conquest of Politics: Liberal Philosophy in Democratic Times (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
Barnes, J. (ed.) (1984) The Complete Works of Aristotle (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Barthes, R. (1967) Elements of Sociology (New York: Hill & Wang).
Baudrillard, J. (1972) For a Critique of the Political Economy of the Sign (St Louis, Mo.: Telo Press).
Baudrillard, J. (1973) The Mirror of Production (St Louis, Mo.: Telo Press).
Bauman, Z. (1993) Postmodern Ethics (Oxford: Blackwell).
Beckett, R. and J. Jonker (forthcoming) ‘How Social Reporting omits key data Ethical Space’, Journal of Communication Ethics.
Benhabib, S. (1992) Situating the Self: Gender, Community and Postmodernism in Contemporary Ethics (Princeton, NJ: Prince University Press).
Benhabib, S. (1996) ‘Toward a deliberative model of democratic legitimacy’, in S. Benhabib (ed.), Polity Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political (Princeton: Princeton University Press) pp. 67–94.
Bourdieu, P. (1992) Language and Symbolic Power (Cambridge: Polity Press).
Bruhn-Jensen, K. (1995) The Social Semiotics of Mass Communication (London: Sage).
Buber, M. (1947) Between Man and Man (London: Kegan Paul).
Buber, M. (2004) I and Thou (London: Continuum).
Carey (1992) Communication as Culture: Essays on Media and Society (New York: Routledge).
Christians, C. and M. Traber (eds) (1997) Communication Ethics and Universal Values (London: Sage).
Derrida, (1973) Speech and Phenomena of Grammatology and Writing and Difference (Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press).
Dostal, R. (ed.) (2002) The Cambridge Companion to Gadamer (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Eco, U. (1976) A Theory of Semiotics (Bloomington: Indiana University Press).
Foucault, M. (1969) The Archaeology of Knowledge (New York: Pantheon).
Friedson, E. (1970) Profession of Medicine (New York: Dodd, Mead).
Gadamer, H. G. (2003) Truth and Method (New York: Continuum).
Gilligan, C. (1982) In a Different Voice (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press).
Gray, R., D. Owen and C. Adams (1996) Accounting and Accountability (Hemel Hempstead: Prentice-Hall).
Greer, G. (1970) The Female Eunuch (London: Paludin).
Habermas, J. (1984) The Theory of Communicative Action: Reason and Rationalization in Society (Oxford: Polity Press).
Habermas, J. (1987) The Theory of Communicative Action: The Critique Functionalist Reason (Oxford: Polity Press).
Habermas, J. (1989) The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere (Cambridge: Polity).
Habermas, J. (1990) Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action (Cambridge: Polity Press).
Hobbes, T. (1968) Leviathan (London:Penguin).
Institute of Communication Ethics (2001) Lewes: Conference proceedings.
Kennedy, H. (2004) Just Law: The Changing Face of Justice and Why it Matters to Us All (London: Chatto & Windus).
Korten, D. (1995) When Corporations Rule the World (CT: Kumarian Press).
Larson, M. S. (1977) The Rise of Professionalism (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press).
Levinas, E. (1996) Levinas: Basic Philosophical Writings, ed. by A. Peperzak, R. Bernasconi and S. Critchley (Bloomington: Indiana University Press).
Levi Strauss, C. (1963) Structural Anthropology (New York: Anchor).
Locke, J. (1990) Essay Concerning Human Understanding (London: Penguin Books).
Lyotard, J. F. (1979) The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge (Minneapolis, Minn.: University of Minnesota Press).
Makau, J. M. and R. C. Arnett (1997) Communication Ethics in an Age of Diversity (Ill.: University of Illinois Press).
McCarthy, T. (1996) The Critical Theory of Jurgen Habermas (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press).
McLuhan, M. (1964) Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul).
Monbiot, G. (2000) Captive State: The Corporate Takeover of Britain (London: Macmillan).
Pasquali, A. (1997) ‘The Moral Dimension of Communicating’, in C. Christians and M. Traber (eds), Universal Values and Communication Ethics (London: Sage), p. 32.
Rawls, J. (1972) A Theory of Justice (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Rawls, J. (1993) Political Liberalism (New York: Columbia University Press).
Rehg, W. (1994) Jurgen Habermas Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press).
Rousseau, J.-J. (1764) The Social Contract (New York: Knopf).
Sanders, K. (2004) Media Ethics (London: Sage).
Saussure, F. de [1916] (1974) Course in General Linguistics, trans. by W. Baskin (London: Fontana/Collins).
Suzuki, D. and H. Dressel (1999) Naked Ape to Superspecies (Sydney: Allen & Unwin).
Weber, M. (1958) The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism (New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons).
Wood, L. and R. Kroger (2000) Doing Discourse Analysis (London: Sage).
Yanklelovitch, D. (1999) The Magic of Dialogue (New York: Simon & Schuster).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2006 Robert Beckett and Jan Jonker
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Beckett, R., Jonker, J. (2006). Reinventing Social Dialogue. In: Jonker, J., de Witte, M. (eds) The Challenge of Organizing and Implementing Corporate Social Responsibility. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230626355_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230626355_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-52127-2
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-62635-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Business & Management CollectionBusiness and Management (R0)