Skip to main content

Sensitivity Analysis of Portfolio Volatility: Importance of Weights, Sectors and Impact of Trading Strategies

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Finance and Capital Markets Series ((FCMS))

Abstract

This chapter discusses the application of a new method to the Sensitivity Analysis (SA) of portfolio properties and proposes an SA scheme that is capable of assessing the joint impact of changes in portfolio composition on portfolio volatility (σ p ).

We would like to thank Simone Manganelli for providing us with data and basic MatLab codes, and participants at EWFM (Brescia, May 2005) for useful comments on an earlier draft. We also thank Guillermo Baquero for precious comments at the EFMA conference (Milan, 2005). Financial support from Bocconi University is gratefully acknowledged.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Black, F. and Scholes, M. (1973) “The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities”, Journal of Political Economy, 81 (3): 637–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bollerslev, T. (1986) “Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity”, Journal of Econometrics, 31: 307–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bollerslev, T. and Engle, R.F. (1993) “Common Persistence in Conditional Variances”, Econometrica, 61 (1): 167–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borgonovo, E. (2001) “Risk-Informed Decision Making: Sensitivity Analysis and Applications”, Ph.D thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgonovo, E. and Apostolakis, G.E. (2001) “A New Importance Measure for Risk- Informed Decision-Making”, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 72 (2): 193–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borgonovo, E. and Apostolakis, G.E. (2001) “On Local Sensitivity Measures”, Proceedings of Sensitivity Analysis of Model Output, Madrid, Spain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgonovo, E. and Peccati, L. (2004) “Sensitivity Analysis in Investment Project Evaluation”, International Journal of Production Economics, 90: 17–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borgonovo, E. (2001) “Importance Relations and Sensitivity Analysis in Decision Theory”, Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Foundations and Applications of Utility, Risk and Decision Theory, Torino, 30 May-2 June 2001, pp. 20–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgonovo, E. and Peccati, L. (2004) “The Importance of Assumptions in Investment Evaluation”, International Journal of Production Economics, 90: 17–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J.Y., Lo, A.W. and MacKinlay, A.C. (1997) The Econometrics of Financial Markets (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Campolongo, F. and Saltelli, A. (1997) “Sensitivity Analysis of an Environmental Model: an Application of Different Analysis Methods”, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 57: 49–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheok, M.C., Parry, G.W. and Sherry, R.R. (1998) “Use of Importance Measures in Risk Informed Regulatory Applications”, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 60: 213–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drudi, F., Generale, A. and Majnoni, G. (1997) “Sensitivity of VaR Measures to Different Risk Models”, Banca d’Italia, Terni di discussione, no. 317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duan, J.-C. (1995) “The GARCH Option Pricing Model”, Mathematical Finance, 5: 13–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duan, J.-C. and Zhang, H. (2001) “Pricing Hang Seng Index Options around the Asian Financial Crisis–A GARCH Approach”, Journal of Banking and Finance, 25 (11): 1989–2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engle, R.F. (1982) “Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity with Estimates of the Variance of the United Kingdom Inflation”, Econometrica, 50: 987–1007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engle, R.F. and Merzich, J. (1996) “GARCH for Groups”, RISK, August: 36–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gourieroux, C., Laurent, J.P. and Scaillet, O. (2000) “Sensitivity Analysis of Values at Risk”, Journal of Empirical Finance, 7: 225–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hull, J.C. (1999) Options, Futures and Other Derivatives (Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall).

    Google Scholar 

  • Manganelli, S. (2004) “Asset Allocation by Variance Sensitivity Analysis”, Journal of Financial Econometrics, 2 (3): 370–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manganelli, S., Ceci, V. and Vecchiato, W. (2002) “Sensitivity Analysis of Volatility: A New Tool for Risk Management”, European Central Bank, Working Paper Series, Working Paper no. 194.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeil A.J. and Frey, R. (2000) “Estimation of Tail Related Risk Measures for Heteroskedastic Financial Time Series: An Extreme Value Approach”, Journal of Empirical Finance, 7 (3–4): 271–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noh, J. (1997) “Small Sample Properties of GARCH(1,1) Estimator Under Non-normality”, Economics Letters, 55: 161–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saltelli, A. (1997) “The Role of Sensitivity Analysis in the Corroboration of Models and its Link to Model Structural and Parametric Uncertainty”, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 57: 1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saltelli, A. (1999) “Sensitivity Analysis: Could Better Methods be Used?”, Journal of Geophysical Research, 104: 3789–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saltelli, A. (2003) “Introduction to Variance-Based Sensitivity Analysis”, JRC, mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saltelli, A., Tarantola, S. and Chan, K.P.S. (1999) “A Quantitative Model-Independent Method for Global Sensitivity Analysis of Model Output”, Technometrics, 41 (1): 39–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shephard, N. (2005) “Stochastic Volatility”, in N. Shephard (ed.), Advanced Texts in Econometrics (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, C.P. and Blume, L. (1994) Mathematics for Economists (New York: W.W. Norton & Co.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Taggart, R.A. (1996) Quantitative Analysis for Investment Management (Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall).

    Google Scholar 

  • Turanyi, T. and Rabitz, H. (2000) “Local Methods”, in A. Saltelli, K. Chan and E.M. Scott (eds), Sensitivity Analysis (Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Z. (1998) “Efficiency Loss and Constraints on Portfolio Holding”, Journal of Financial Economics, 48 (3): 359–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2007 Emanuele Borgonovo and Marco Percoco

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Borgonovo, E., Percoco, M. (2007). Sensitivity Analysis of Portfolio Volatility: Importance of Weights, Sectors and Impact of Trading Strategies. In: Gregoriou, G.N. (eds) Advances in Risk Management. Finance and Capital Markets Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230625846_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics