Abstract
In Europe, Hungary ranks only behind the Netherlands with respect to flood exposure, and by some estimates flood losses could be in the order of seven to nine per cent of Hungary’s gross domestic product.1 Adding to the scale of the problem, floods appear to be worsening in their intensity and frequency. In view of these increasing losses, the Hungarian government is concerned about continuing its tradition of taking almost full responsibility for flood risk management, including prevention, response, relief, repair, reconstruction and other forms of compensation for private losses. With its membership in the European Union, Hungary has committed itself to a programme of fiscal austerity, and for this reason some government authorities would welcome more private responsibility for the prevention of, and response to, flood disasters. However, many Hungarians regard the transfer of liability for flood losses to citizens, especially those living in very poor areas, as unfair. One of the more controversial issues in Hungary, and throughout Europe, is thus the respective roles of the government and the private market in preventing flood losses and providing compensation to flood victims.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Halcrow Water, Flood Control Development in Hungary: Feasibility Study. Final Report (Halcrow Group Ltd., 1999).
Ortwin Renn, Thomas Webler and Peter Wiedemann, ‘A Need for Discourse on Citizen Participation: Objectives and Structure of the Book’, in Ortwin Renn,Thomas Webler and Peter Wiedemann (eds), Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation: Evaluating Models for Environmental Discourse (Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer, 1995), p. 2.
S. Pecher, I. Pecher and U. Kichura, ‘Conception for the Regeneration of the Upper Forest Boundary and for the Optimization of Hydrological Regime in the Ukrainian Carpathians, 1997’, in J. Hamar and A. Sárkány-Kiss (eds), The Upper Tisza Valley: Preparatory Proposal for Ramsar Site Designation and an Ecological Background (Szeged, Hungary: Tisza Klub, 1999).
Steve Rayner, Elizabeth L. Malone and Michael Thompson, ‘Equity Issues and Integrated Assessment’, in Ferenc Toth (ed.), Fair Weather? (London: Earthscan, 1999).
Michael Thompson, Richard Ellis and Aaron Wildavsky, Cultural Theory (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1990).
James D. Fearon, ‘Deliberation as Discussion’ in Jon Elster (ed.), Deliberative Democracy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).
Jürgen Habermas, The Theory of Communicative Action I: Reason and the Rationalisation of Society (Boston, MA: Beacon Press, 1984).
John Rawls, Political Liberalism (New York: Columbia University Press, 1993).
John Dryzek, ‘Introduction: the Deliberative Turn in Democracy Theory’, in John Dryzek, Deliberative Democracy and Beyond (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2006 Joanne Linnerooth-Bayer, Anna Vári and Michael Thompson
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Linnerooth-Bayer, J., Vári, A., Thompson, M. (2006). Floods and Fairness in Hungary. In: Verweij, M., Thompson, M. (eds) Clumsy Solutions for a Complex World. Global Issues Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230624887_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230624887_8
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-28058-2
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-62488-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)