Abstract
It is often stated that although laws exist on paper in China, they do not work in practice. Generally speaking, legal studies do not make use of quantitative tools to measure the degree of “usefulness”. When our project is complete, a hint may be given. Until then, we had better to keep in our mind that all arguments related this question are only qualitative studies – a patchwork of conclusions based on individual experiences.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Kaneko Yuka (2004) Asia kiki to kin’yu housei kaikaku-houseibishien no jissenteki houhouron wo sagutte (The Asian Crisis and Financial Law Reform: In Search of Practical Aid for Legal Institution Building. Tokyo: Shinzan-sha.
Xie Sichuan et al. (2003) Zhuanxingqi Zhongguo caichan zhidu bianqian yanjiu (Study on the Development of Property Institutions During the Transition Period in China), Economic Science Publisher.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2006 Institute of Developing Economies (IDE), JETRO
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Takamizawa, O. (2006). Trade Credits and Chinese Law. In: Watanabe, M. (eds) Recovering Financial Systems. IDE-JETRO. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230624863_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230624863_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-28141-1
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-62486-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)