Advertisement

Patriarchal Ecumenism, Feminism, and Women’s Religious Experiences in Costa Rica

  • Elina Vuola
Chapter

Abstract

This is an excerpt from one of the interviews that I conducted with Costa Rican Catholic women in 2006 and 2007 on the meaning of the Virgin Mary. It expresses something that I heard in one way or another in most—if not all—interviews: that the Virgin Mary is both like me (another woman) and unlike me (different). I have earlier called this interplay of identification with and differentiation from Mary in women’s devotion to her the “both-and character” of women’s popular Marian piety.’ In this chapter, I bring forth this double meaning of the Virgin Mary for many Catholic women as a critique of a tendency in feminist scholarship on Latin American women to see religion, and more specifically, the Virgin Mary, solely as a source of women’s sufferings and alienation. The quotation summarizes one central tenet in women’s devotion of Mary that is lacking in secular feminist analyses of the influence of Catholicism on women: Mary understands and sustains women, both as a human female, like themselves, and as a powerful divine source of compassion.

Keywords

Religious Tradition Feminist Scholarship Feminist Critique Repressive State Parking Spot 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alvarez, S. E. 1990. Engendering Democracy in Brazil. Women’s Movements in Transition Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  2. —. 1994. The (Trans)formation of Feminism(s) and Gender Politics in Democratizing Brazil. In The Women’s Movement in Latin America. Participation and Democracy, ed. J. S. Jaquette, pp. 13–63. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bachrach, Ehlers T. 1991. Debunking Marianismo: Economic Vulnerability and Survival Strategies among Guatemalan Wives. Ethnology 30 (1): 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baldez, L. 2002. Why Women Protest. Women’s Movements in Chile. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Browner, C., and E. Lewin. 1982. Female Altruism Reconsidered: The Virgin Mary as Economic Woman. American Ethnologist 9(1): 61–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chant, S., and N. Craske. 2003. Gender in Latin America. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chopp, R. S., and M. L. Taylor. 1994. Introduction: Crisis, Hope, and Contemporary Theology. In Reconstructing Christian Theology, ed. R. S. Chopp and M. L. Taylor, pp. 1–24. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.Google Scholar
  8. Code, L., ed. 2000. Encyclopedia of Feminist Theories. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Craske, N. 1999. Women and Politics in Latin America. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Eckstein, S. 2001. Power and Popular Protest in Latin America. In Power and Popular Protest. Latin American Social Movements, ed. S. Eckstein, pp. 1–60. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  11. Giblin, M. J. 1996. Empowerment. In Dictionary of Feminist Theologies, ed. L. M. Russell and J. S. Clarkson, pp. 83–84. Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press.Google Scholar
  12. Hawley, J. S. 1999. Fundamentalism. In Religious Fundamentalisms and the Human Rights of Women, ed. C. W. Howland, pp. 3–8. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  13. Humm, M. 1990. The Dictionary of Feminist Theory. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Huntington, S. P. 1996. The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  15. Navarro, M. 2001. The Personal is Political: Las Madres de Plaza de Mayo. In Power and Popular Protest. Latin American Social Movements, ed. S. Eckstein, pp. 241–58. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  16. —. 2002. “Against Marianismo.” In Gender’s Place. Feminist Anthropologies of Latin America, ed. R. Montoya, L. J. Frazier and J. Hurtig, pp. 257–72. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  17. Orsi, R. A. 2002. The Madonna of the 115th Street. Faith and Community in Italian Harlem, 1880–1950. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Pelikan, J. 1996. Mary Through the Centuries. Her Place in the History of Culture. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Stephen, L. 2000. Women and Social Movements in Latin America. Power from Below. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  20. Stevens, E. 1973a. Machismo and Marianismo. Society 10 (6): 57–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. —. 1973b. Marianismo: The Other Face of Machismo in Latin America. In Female and Male in Latin America. Essays, ed. A. Pescatello, pp. 89–101. Pittsburgh: Universitv of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
  22. Vuola, E. 2002. Remaking Universals? Transnational Feminism(s) Challenging Fundamentalist Ecumenism. Theory. Culture and Society 19 (1–2): 175–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. —. 2006. Seriously Harmful for Your Health? Religion, Feminism, and Sexuality in Latin America. In Liberation Theology and Sexuality: New Radicalism from Latin America, ed. M. Althaus-Reid, pp. 137–62. London: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  24. —. 2009, forthcoming. La Morenita on Skis. Women’s Popular Marian Piety and Feminist Research of Religion. In Oxford Handbook of Feminist Theology, ed. S. Briggs and M. McClintock Fulkerson. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Van Leer Jerusalem Institute and the Women’s Studies in Religion Program, Harvard Divinity School 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elina Vuola

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations