Abstract
Brazil has a long history of frequent party switching by sitting legislators. Although there are other countries with higher rates of switching, most are transitioning democracies with evolving party systems. In such contexts, switching goes hand in hand with less-developed party brands, weaker voter partisan attachments, and evolving norms and procedures of recruitment and hierarchy. The Brazilian case appears to represent a stable long-term equilibrium, with fairly steady rates of switching over the last 20 years: approximately one-third of deputies have switched in each legislature since democratization. Table 5.1 shows switching rates in the last several legislatures. During the 49th legislature (1991–1994), there were 262 incidents of switching, for an average switching rate of .52 per legislator-term. That figure slips slightly to .41 in the second period, and rises to .51 in the third.1 Switching was prohibited for most of Brazil’s authoritarian period (1964–1985), but scholars of previous periods have noted high rates of switching in the 1960s and even as far back as the 1800s (Graham, 1990): Switching apparently was common during the Second Republic (1946–1964), and there is evidence as well of frequent switching during the First Republic (1889–1930).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
5.6 References
Abrúcio, Fernando. 1998. Os Barões da Federação: Os Governadores e a Redemocratização Brasileira. São Paulo: Editora Hucitec.
Aldrich, John H. 1995. Why Parties? The Origin and Transformation of Political Parties in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Aldrich, John H., and William T. Bianco. 1992. A Game-Theoretic Model of Party Affiliation of Candidates and Office Holders. Mathematical Computer Modeling 16(8-9): 103–116.
Ames, Barry. 1995a. Electoral Rules, Constituency Pressures, and Pork Barrel: Bases of Voting in the Brazilian Congress. Journal of Politics 57(May): 324–343.
Ames, Barry. 1995b. Electoral Strategy under Open-List Proportional Representation. American Journal of Political Science 39(May): 406–433.
Ames, Barry. 2001. The Deadlock of Democracy in Brazil. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Amorim Neto, Octavio. 1998. Of Presidents, Parties, and Ministers: Cabinet Formation and Legislative Decision-Making Under Separation of Powers. Ph.D. thesis, University of California, San Diego.
Beck, Nathaniel, Jonathan N. Katz, and Richard Tucker. 1999. Taking Time Seriously: Time-Series-Cross-Section Analysis with a Binary Dependent Variable. American Journal of Political Science 42(October): 1260–1288.
Ben-Akiva, Moshe, and Steven R. Lerman 1985. Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Carey, John M., and Matthew Soberg Shugart. 1995. Incentives to Cultivate a Personal Vote: A Rank Ordering of Electoral Formulas. Electoral Studies 14(December): 417–439.
Desposato, Scott W. 2006. The Impact of Party Switching on Legislative Behavior in Brazil. Working Paper.
Glasgow, Garrett. 2001. Mixed Logit Models for Multiparty Elections. Political Analysis 9(Spring): 116–136.
Graham, Richard. 1990. Patronage and Politics in Nineteenth-Century Brazil. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Heller, William B., and Carol Mershon. 2005. Party Switching in the Italian Chamber of Deputies, 1996–2001. Journal of Politics 67(May): 536–559.
Heller, William B., and Carol Mershon. 2008. Dealing in Discipline: Party Switching and Legislative Voting in the Italian Chamber of Deputies, 1988–2000. American Journal of Political Science 52 (4): 910–925.
Keck, Margaret E. 1995. The Workers’ Party and Democratization in Brazil. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Leal, Victor N. 1977. Coronelismo: The Municipality and Representative Government in Brazil. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Londregan, J. B. 2002. Appointment, Reelection, and Autonomy in the Senate of Chile. In Legislative Politics in Latin America, ed. Scott Morgenstern and Benito Nacif, 341–376. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Long, J. Scott. 1997. Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables. Number 7 in Advanced Quantititative Techniques in the Social Sciences Series. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Maddala, G. S. 1983. Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mainwaring, Scott. P. 1997. Multipartism, Robust Federalism, and Presidentialism in Brazil. In Presidentialism and Democracy in Latin America, ed. Scott P. Mainwaring and Matthew Soberg Shugart, 55–109. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Mainwaring, Scott. P. 1999. Rethinking Party Systems in the Third Wave of Democratization: The Case of Brazil. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
McFadden, Daniel. 1973. Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior. In Frontiers in Econometrics, ed. Paul Zarembka, 105–142. New York: Academic.
Mershon, Carol, and Olga Shvetsova. 2008a. Parliamentary Cycles and Party Switching in Legislatures. Comparative Political Studies 41(1): 99–127.
Mershon, Carol, and Olga Shvetsova. 2008b. Party Switching in Sitting Parliaments and the Midterm Effect. Annual Joint Sessions of the European Consortium for Political Research, Rennes, France.
Pereira, Carlos, and Bernardo Mueller. 2004. The Cost of Governing: Strategic Behavior of the President and Legislators in Brazil’s Budgetary Process. Comparative Political Studies 37(7): 781–815.
Poole, Keith T., and Howard Rosenthal. 1997. Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll Call Voting. New York: Oxford University Press.
Samuels, David. 2003. Ambition, Federalism, and Legislative Politics in Brazil. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Samuels, David. 2006. Sources of Mass Partisanship in Brazil. Latin American Politics and Society 48(Summer): 1–27.
Schneider, Aaron. 2001. Federalism against Markets: Local Struggles for Power and National Fiscal Adjustment in Brazil. Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Berkeley.
Snyder Jr., James M., and Michael M. Ting. 2001. An Informational Rationale for Political Parties. American Journal of Political Science 46(January): 90–110.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2009 William B. Heller and Carol Mershon
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Desposato, S. (2009). Party Switching in Brazil: Causes, Effects, and Representation. In: Heller, W.B., Mershon, C. (eds) Political Parties and Legislative Party Switching. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230622555_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230622555_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-37425-0
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-62255-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)