Skip to main content
Book cover

Organizational Learning pp 165–192Cite as

Palgrave Macmillan

Pragmatics of Managing Organizational Knowledge

  • Chapter

  • 205 Accesses

Abstract

Every organization is a learning organization, although some are more effective than others. Best-in-class learning organizations appreciate the power, the complexity, and the challenge of managing all four methods that determine just how effectively the organization learns and applies that learning. These organizations embrace the organizational development techniques that shape the Culture, make use of Old Pros, deploy Archives appropriately, and successfully master the principles and tools that enable them to perpetually control their ever-evolving Processes. The result is an integrated environment that enables the organization to make optimal use of what it knows and to extend its knowledge faster than its competition.

Keywords

  • Knowledge Management
  • Knowledge Transfer
  • Knowledge Sharing
  • Tacit Knowledge
  • Managing ORGANIZ

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1057/9780230621541_8
  • Chapter length: 28 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-0-230-62154-1
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Boland, R.J.J., and R.V. Tenkasi. (1995). Perspective making and perspective taking in communities of knowing. Organization Science 6(4): 350–372.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • The authors offer an approach to facilitating knowledge work (new product and service development) by the design of electronic communication systems to support the work activity. Their emphasis is on the fostering of communication and collaboration rather than on the capture, storage, and retrieval of knowledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J.S., and P. Duguid. (1998). Organizing knowledge. California Management Review 3: 90–111.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • The authors speak eloquently about the impact of organizational structure on knowledge building and knowledge use. They advocate social tools such as translators and knowledge brokers to bridge the gaps. They advocate information technology tools as a supplement only.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenport, T.H., and L. Prusak, L. (1998). Working knowledge: how organizations manage what they know. Boston, Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • The authors emphasize the need to use work processes to manage the organization’s knowledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, J.H., and H. Singh. (1998). The relational view: cooperative strategy and sources of inter-organizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review 23(4): 660–679.

    Google Scholar 

  • The authors describe how organizations can cooperate effectively to both gain new knowledge and protect their own proprietary knowledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fahey, L., and L. Prusak. (1998). The eleven deadliest sins of knowledge management. California Management Review 3: 265–276.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • The summary of “sins” is derived from their years of study of overall organizational knowledge management competence across industries.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellstrom, T., U. Malmqvist et al. (2001). Knowledge brokerage in a software engineering firm—towards a practical model for managing knowledge work in social networks. A report from the Institute for management of innovation and technology. Chalmers Institute of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden, IMIT WP:2001_118. Antal sidor: 24.

    Google Scholar 

  • The paper outlines the case for decentralized management of knowledge work. The authors argue that top-down perspectives on knowledge have dominated management initiatives but have failed to provide the benefits of a decentralized system founded in organizational cultural norms and work routines.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, J.G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science 2(1): 16.

    Google Scholar 

  • The paper argues that organizations that focus on exploitation of what they know to the exclusion of the exploration of what they might learn may reap benefits in the short term but will likely suffer competitively in the long term.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Dell, C., and C.J. Grayson. (1998). If only we knew what we know: identification and transfer of best practices. California Management Review 40(3) (Spring): 154–173.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • This paper summarized the findings of several studies about knowledge management success and failure across an array of organizations. Powell, W.W., K.W. Koput, and L. Smith-Doerr. (1996). Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly 41: 116–145.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • The paper describes how knowledge-sharing networks enable knowledge sharing in the biotechnology industry.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Hippel, E. (1988). The sources of innovation. New York, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • The author describes how innovation is facilitated and enhanced. von Krough, G., K. Ichigo et al. (2000). Enabling knowledge creation: how to unlock the mystery of tacit knowledge and release the power of innovation. New York, Oxford University Press.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • The authors suggest the problem of knowledge sharing stems from distributed and diverse interests of organizational members rather than a problem with tools and infrastructure.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Jerry L. Wellman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Copyright information

© 2009 Jerry L. Wellman

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wellman, J.L. (2009). Pragmatics of Managing Organizational Knowledge. In: Organizational Learning. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230621541_8

Download citation