Skip to main content

How Organizations Remember What They Know

  • Chapter
Organizational Learning
  • 233 Accesses

Abstract

Our ability to think, our capacity to use what we know, has been subject to question for as long as we have been thinking. Chapter two explores some of the elements of individual and organizational memory and thought, beginning with a brief description of how individual memory operates and how individuals handle, or mishandle, what they know. Memory is after all the acquisition, storage, and retrieval of knowledge. This sets the stage for an analogous discussion of how organizations remember and how they deal with what they know.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Argyris, C., and D. Schön. (1978). Organizational learning: a theory of action perspective. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris and Schon argue that people have mental maps with regard to how to act in situations and that it is these maps that guide people’s actions rather than the theories they explicitly espouse. Few people are even aware of the maps or theories that drive their actions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ariely, D. (2008). Predictably irrational: the hidden forces that shape our decisions. New York, Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ariely, a behavioral economist at MIT, offers multiple examples of irrational economic decision making, examples that resonate well with seemingly irrational decisions made by individuals in other arenas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenport, T.H., and L. Prusak. (1998). Working knowledge: how organizations manage what they know. Boston, Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halpern, D. (1996). Thought and knowledge: an introduction to critical thinking. Mahwah, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • The first three chapters of this textbook address thinking, memory, and language as it relates to decision making. The book pulls together information and insights from a variety of sources putting them in an easy to grasp context.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, Steven. (1994, February). Radically improving corporate performance: practical change interventions that work. Presentation at the Executive Focus International 1994 Executive Forum. Orlando, Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr began as an academic, was spotted by Jack Welch and wooed into industry. He is currently the chief learning officer at Goldman Sachs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinker, S. (1997). How the mind works. New York, W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • This book provides a clear, entertaining, yet detailed description of how the mind works. He addresses the questions of what makes intelligence possible and what makes sentience possible. He also provides insights into how the brain evolved and how it functions, including how memory functions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandelands, L.E., and R.E. Stablein. (1987). The concept of organization mind. Research in the sociology of organizations, vol. 6. N. DiTomaso and S. Bachrach, eds. Greenwich, JAI Press: 135–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • These two were among the first to portray organizations as “mental entities capable of thought.”

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein, Edgar. (1993). How can organizations learn faster? The challenge of entering the green room. Sloan Management Review (Winter): 33–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein describes three types of organizational learning: knowledge acquisition and insight, habit and skill learning, and emotional conditioning and learned anxiety.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, D.G., M. Divitini, and T. Brasethvik. (1999). On knowledge management in the Internet age. Hershey, PA. IGI Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • The authors brought together a collection of perspectives about knowledge management in general, and Internet-based knowledge management in particular. They acknowledge the perspective that IT is expected to be the Holy Grail of knowledge management success but that the results have remained elusive. They offer an integrated perspective that includes IT but does not rely solely on it.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh and Ungson. (1991). Organizational memory. Academy of Management Review 16(1): 57–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh and Ungson argue that the current representations of the concept of organizational memory are fragmented and underdeveloped. They attempt to better define organizational memory and elaborate on its structure. They also discuss the processes of information acquisition, retention, and retrieval.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K.E. (1991). The nontraditional quality of organizational learning. Organization Science 2(1): 8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weick agues that individuals demonstrate learning behavior when they display a different response to the same stimuli while organizations demonstrate learning behavior when they display the same response to different stimuli.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2009 Jerry L. Wellman

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wellman, J.L. (2009). How Organizations Remember What They Know. In: Organizational Learning. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230621541_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics