Abstract
The analysis of spatial segregation involves several methodological issues. First, there are multiple dimensions of socioeconomic residential segregation and different ways of measuring each. Second, social processes in space will not necessarily correspond to the geographical definitions used in comprehensive data collection, such as national population censuses, thus creating problems of measurement. But the field of spatial statistical analysis and geocoded census data creates new opportunities for addressing these issues and advancing the state of the art. Finally, of particular relevance to this volume, is that population censuses have yet to be standardized across countries in the Americas, as has been the case with the European Union, and, thus, formal, quantitative cross-country comparisons are not yet feasible. In this chapter the methodological frame used in the case studies that follow is presented. This chapter first defines the multiple dimensions of segregation and their measurement. The types of measurement errors common to this type of analysis, including the problem of areal definition and spatial autocorrelation, are explored. Finally, the types of variable and areal definitions adopted in the case studies are presented.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Anselin, L. (1988). spatial econometrics: Methods and models. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Anselin, L. (1995). Local Indicators of Spatial Autocorrelation-LISA. Geographical Analysis. 27(2), (April).
Anselin, L. (1999). Interactive techniques and exploratory spatial data analysis. In P. Longley, M. Goodchild, and D. Rhind (eds.), Geographical information systems 2nd edition. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Anselin, L. and A. Bera (1998). Spatial dependence in linear regression models with an introduction to spatial econometrics. Chapter 7 in A. Ullah and D. E. A. Giles (eds.), Handbook of applied economic statistics. Statistics, Textbooks and Monographs, p. 155. New York: Marcel Dekker.
Blau, P. (1977). Inequality and heterogeneity. London: Collier Macmillan Publishers.
Cliff, A. and Ord, J. K. (1981). Spatial processes: Models and applications. London: Pion.
Cohen, J. K., Frank Falk, R., and Cortese, C. F. (1978). Understanding the standardized index of dissimilarity. American Sociological Review, 43, 590–92.
Cortese, C. F., Frank Falk, R., and Cohen, J. K. (1976). Further considerations on the methodological analysis of segregation indices. American Sociological Review, 41, 630–37.
Duncan, O. and Duncan, B. (1955). A methodological analysis of segregation indices. American Sociological Review, 20, 210–217.
Gephart, M. (1997). Neighborhoods and communities as context for development. In J. Brooks-Gunn, G. Duncan, and L. Aber (eds.), Neighborhood poverty. Volume I: Context and consequences for children, pp. 1–43. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Kearns, A. and Parkinson, M. (2001). The significance of neighborhood. Urban Studies, 38, 2103–2110.
Lieberson, L. (1981). An asymmetrical approach to segregation. In C. Peach, V. Robinson, and S. Smith (eds.), Ethnic segregation in cities, pp. 61–82. London: Croom-Helm.
Lupton, R. and Power, A. (2003). Social exclusion and neighborhoods. In J. Hills, J. L. Grand, and D. Piachaud (eds.), Understanding social exclusion, pp. 118–140. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Massey, D. and Denton, N. A. (1988). The Dimensions of residential segregation. Social Forces, 67(2), 281–315.
Reardon, S. and Firebaugh, G. (2002). Measures of multigroup segregation. Sociological Methodology, 32(1), 33–67.
Sabatini, F. (2004). Medición de la segregación residencial: Reflexiones metodológicas desde la ciudad latinoamericana. In F. Sabatini and G. Caceres (eds.), Barrios cerrados en Santiago de Chile: Entre la exclusion y la integración residencial. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
Teauber, K. and Teauber, A. (1965). Negroes in cities: Residential segregation and neighborhood change. Chicago: Aldine.
Tobler, W. (1970). A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit region. Economic Geography, 46, 234–240.
White, M. (1983). The measurement of spatial segregation. The American Journal of Sociology, 88, 1008–1018.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2009 Bryan R. Roberts and Robert H. Wilson
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Flores, C. (2009). Advances in Research Methods for the Study of Urban Segregation. In: Roberts, B.R., Wilson, R.H. (eds) Urban Segregation and Governance in the Americas. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230620841_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230620841_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-37619-3
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-62084-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)