Abstract
Land ownership is a crucial issue. Nearly all social struggles in history are “essentially for the ownership and use of land” (Weber 1988, 343). Throughout China’s history, land and its distribution have been central to any understanding of the country’s complex relationship between power, politics, and economics (Brenner 2004). Various land tenure policies provide an insight to the historical changes and to gauge rapidly changing social and economic landscape in contemporary China. China’s dual land tenure system has become a critical source of debate in China’s rising housing costs and widespread official corruption in land transactions. The dual system of land use reflects the transitional nature of Chinese economic structure that attempts to maintain centralized administrative control over land use and at the same time allows land allocation to those who can pay the highest price for commercial lease. The dual system creates an unparalleled opportunity for widespread corruption and various social problems.
The first author of this chapter would like to express his appreciation for Professor Cai Jiming of Qinghua University, Beijing, China. He was inspired by Professor Cai’s talk on China’s farm land compensation issue at China at a Crossroads: Searching for a Balanced Approach to Development at Harvard Law School in Cambridge, Massachusetts on November 5–6, 2005.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Boston Consulting Group. 2007. Tapping human assets to sustain growth: 2007 Report. Available at: http://www.bcg.com/impact_expertise/publications/files/Tapping_Human_Assets_GW_Sept_2007.pdf (accessed November 15, 2007).
Brandt, L., S. Rozelle, and M. A. Turner. 2004. Local government behavior and property right formation in rural China. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 160: 627–662.
Brenner, M. 2004. The evolution of land distribution in reform-era China. Political Economy Research Institute of University of Massachusetts. Available at: http://62.237.131.23/research/2004–2005/2004–2005–6/cip2/papers/brenner.pdf (accessed October 20, 2007).
Chan, N. 2003. Land acquisition compensation in China: Problems and answers. International Real Estate Review 6: 136–152.
Chen, J. H. 2006. When Ren Zhiqiang defends excessive profit in real estate, What does it reveal? The black-hole in the housing cost. Shanghai Securities Daily. October 24. Available at: http://www.chinanews.com.cn/estate (accessed October 20, 2006).
Chen, W. 2002. Warning signs of increasing rural vs. urban inequality. China Youth Daily November 1.
Cheung, S. 1996. A simplistic general equilibrium theory of corruption. Contemporary Economic Policy 14: 1–5.
Clarke, S. 1982. Marx, marginalism and modern sociology: From Adam Smith to Max Weber. London: Macmillan Press.
The Constitution of the People’s Republic of China of 1975 and 1982.
Ding, C. R. 2003. Land policy reform in China: Assessment and prospects. Land Use Policy 20: 109–120.
—. 2007. Policy and praxis of land acquisition in China. Land Use Policy 24: 1–13.
Editorial Office of China Land and Resources Almanac. 1999–2006. China Land and Resources Almanac 1999–2006. Beijing, China: Editorial Office of China Land and Resources Almanac.
Guo, Y. K. 2007. Government’s dilemma: The investigative report on Longquan land conflict. China Lawyer Observation Network March 5. Available at: http://www.ccwlawyer.com/center.asp?idd=936 (In Chinese) (accessed November 24, 2007).
Hu, Yi. 2007. The central government investigates the collaboration between officials and business: Major shock for Shanghai real estate industry. New Century Weekly. Available at: http://www.dzwww.com/synr/jdxw/200705/t20070523_2176175.htm (In Chinese) (accessed October 28, 2007).
Jin, H. H., Y. Y. Qian, and B. R. Weingast. 2005. Regional decentralization and fiscal incentives: Federalism, Chinese style. Journal of Public Economics 89: 1719–1742.
Keidel, A. 2006. China’s social unrest: The story behind the stories. Carnegie Endowment Policy Brief Number 48, September. Available at: http://www.carnegieendowment.org/files/pb48_keidel_final.pdf (accessed November 12, 2007).
Kremzner, M. T. 1998. Managing urban land in China: The emerging legal framework and its role in development. Pacific Rim Law and Policy Journal 7: 611–654.
Kreuger, A. 1974. The political economy of rent-seeking society. American Economic Review 64: 292–303.
Larson, K. M. 1998. A lesson in ingenuity: Chinese farmers, the state, and the reclamation of farmland for most any use. Pacific Rim Law and Policy Journal 7: 831–857.
Lei, A. X. 2005. It is high time for more complete marketization of land transaction. Land Resource Utilization, Department of the Ministry of Natural Resources and Land. Available at: http://www.mlr.gov.cn/zt/2005tudiriluntan/leiaixian.htm (In Chinese) (accessed August 16, 2007).
Li, H. 2004. From revolution to reform: A comparative study of China and Mexico. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
Li, W. W., K. Li, and D. K. Xie. 2004. Farmer without land, work without job, minimum insurance without Qualification. Ningbo Daily March 3: A4.
Lu, M. and C. Wiemer. 2007. Social equity in China: Building a Xiaokang society in an all-round way. Outreach Development November. Available at http://www1.worldbank.org/devoutreach/textonly.asp?id=354 (accessed November 16, 2007).
Lu, X. B. 2000a. Booty socialism, bureau-preneurs, and the state in transition: Organizational corruption in China. Comparative Politics 32: 273–94.
—. 2000b. Cadre and corruption: The organizational involution of the Chinese Communist Party. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Ministry of Natural Resources and Land. 2007. No one should attempt to lift the gate of land resource illegally. Ministry of Natural Resources and Land’s Web site. Available at: http://www.mlr.gov.cn (In Chinese) (accessed July 8, 2007).
Nee, V. 1992. Organizational dynamics of market transition: Hybrid forms, property rights, and mixed economy in China. Administrative Science Quarterly 37: 1–27.
Olofsgård, A. and Z. Zahran. 2007. Corruption and political and economic reforms: A structural breaks approach. Economics Department, Georgetown University. June 1. Available at: http://www9.georgetown.edu/faculty/afo2/papers/corrjune12007.pdf
Oi, J. C. 1995. The role of the local state in China’s transitional economy. China Quarterly 144: 1132–1149.
Palomar, J. 2004. Land tenure security as a market stimulator in China. Duke Journal of Comparative and International Law 12: 7–74.
Phan, P. N. 2005. Enriching the land or the political elite? Lessons from China on democratization of the urban renewal process. Pacific Rim Law and Policy Journal 14: 607–657.
Pils, E. 2005. Land disputes, rights assertion, and social unrest in China: A case from Sichuan Columbia. Journal of Asian Law 19 (Spring): 235–292.
Ping, X. Q. 2006. Evaluation of effectiveness of China’s local budget system and design of indicators. Working Paper Series No. C20006018. Center for Economic Research, Beijing University. Available at: http://www.ccer.edu.cn/download/7184–1.pdf (In Chinese) (accessed May 28, 2007).
Ravillion, M. and S. H. Chen. 2004. China’s (uneven) progress against poverty. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 3408 .Washington DC.
Shao, D. S. 2007. Corruption in real estate and corruption of power capital in China. In The issue of corruption during the drastic social change in China. Available at Guang Ming Daily: http://guancha.gmw.cn/show.aspx?id=4702 (accessed October 30, 2007).
Solnick, S. L. 1996. The breakdown of hierarchies in the Soviet Union and China. World Politics 48: 209–238.
Southern Daily. 2007. Hu Xing’s corruption case in court: More than 10 million bribery in a single transaction. July 9. Available at http://www.southcn.com/news (In Chinese) (accessed November 15, 2007).
Svendsen, G. T. 2003. Social capital, corruption and economic growth: Eastern and Western Europe. Working Paper 03–21. Aarhus, Denmark. Available at http://www.hha.dk/nat/wper/03–21_gts.pdf (accessed July 28, 2007).
Walder, A. 2003. Sociological dimensions of China’s economic transition: Organization, stratification, and social mobility. The Asia/Pacific Research Center of Stanford University. Working Paper. Available at http://iis-db.stanford.edu/pubs/20208/Walder_Sociological.pdf (accessed December 5, 2007).
Wang, F., T. O. Tai, and Y. J. Wang. 2006. A decade of rising poverty in urban China: Who are more likely to fall under. Working Paper 06–14. Center for the Study of Democracy, University of California, Irvine. Available at http://repositories.cdlib.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1132&context=csd (accessed June 20, 2007).
Wang, X. L. 2007. The current status of national income distribution and “grey” income. Research Report of National Economy Research Institute of China Reform Foundation. Available at http://bbs.people.com.cn/postDetail.do?view=1&id=2529141 (In Chinese) (accessed June 20, 2007).
Weber, M. 1988. The agrarian sociology of ancient civilizations. Trans. F. R. I. Verso: London.
Wright, M. 1951. The Chinese peasant and communism. Pacific Affairs 24: 256–265.
Zhang, X. B. 2007. International and urban affairs: Asymmetric property rights in China’s economic growth. William Mitchell Law Review 33: 567–589.
Zhao, X. 2005. Comment on China’s contemporary land tenure system. State Asset Management and Monitoring Commission of the State Council. Available at http://www.ccrs.org.cn (In Chinese) (accessed August 14, 2007).
Zhou, T. Y. 2004. Protecting farmers’ rights in land transactions. China Economic Times February 10. Available at http://news.xinhuanet.com/house/2004–02/10/content_1307434.htm (In Chinese) (accessed November 5, 2007).
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2009 Reza Hasmath and Jennifer Hsu
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Deng, X., Zhang, L., Leverentz, A. (2009). The Dual System of Land Use Policy and Its Related Problems in Contemporary China. In: Hasmath, R., Hsu, J. (eds) China in an Era of Transition. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230620155_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230620155_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-37810-4
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-62015-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)