Abstract
As the cold war concluded, President George H.W. Bush proclaimed the end of the old world order, and signaled twice that America would lead in creating a new one:
We stand today at a unique and extraordinary moment & Out of these troubled times, our fifth objective—a new world order—can emerge: a new era—freer from the threat of terror, stronger in the pursuit of justice, and more secure in the quest for peace. An era in which the nations of the world, East and West, North and South can prosper and live in harmony & Today that new world is struggling to be born, a world quite different from the one we’ve known.1 [And a year later] Now, we can see a new world coming into view. A world in which there is the real prospect of a new world order.2
These pronouncements may have been more rhetoric than an indication of strong policy preferences for constructing a new world order, or they may have constituted an initial response to changing circumstances but faded as domestic policy agendas supplanted foreign policy ones (Nye 1992). It is just as likely, however, that the president of the strongest state to emerge out of the cold war was signaling publicly and committing his foreign policy apparatus to the creation of a new international order that would be substantially different from the one just concluded.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Abbott, Kenneth and Duncan Snidal (1998) “Why States Act through Formal International Organizations”. Journal of Conflict Resolution 52: 3–32.
Barnett, Michael N. and Martha Finnemore (1999) “The Politics, Power, and Pathologies of International Organizations.” International Organization 53: 699–732.
Barnett, Michael N. and Raymond Duvall (2005) “Power in International Politics.” International Organization 59: 39–79.
Baumgartner, Frank and Bryan D. Jones (1993) Agenda and Instability in American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Bearce, David H. and Sawa Omori (2005) “How Do Commercial Institutions Promote Peace?” Journal of Peace Research 42: 659–678.
Beeson, Mark (2006) “American Hegemony and Regionalism: The Rise of East Asia and the End ofthe Asia-Pacific.” Geopolitics 11: 541–560.
Borgatti, Stephen P., Martin G. Everett, and Linton C. Freeman (2002) Ucinet for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis. Cambridge, MA: Analytis Technologies.
Brogan, Patrick (1990) The Fighting Never Stopped: A Comprehensive Guide to World Conflict since1945. New York: Vintage Books.
Buenode Mesquita, Bruce (2003) Principles of International Politics: People’s Power, Preferences, and Perceptions. Washington DC: CQ Press.
Buzan, Barry and Ole Waever (2004) Regions and Powers: The Structures of International Security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cupitt, Richard, Rodney Whitlock, and Lynn Williams Whitlock (1996) “The [Im]mortality of Intergovernmental Organizations.” International Interactions 21: 389–404.
Diehl, Paul F. and Gary Goertz (2000) War and Peace in International Rivalry. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Eckholm, Erik (1999) “Bombing May Have Hardened China’s Line.” New York Times (May 8): Al.
Erlanger, Steven (1997) “Clinton Basks at Summit; Some Europeans Are Cool to US.” New York Times (June 6): Al.
Gartzke, Erik, Timothy Nordstrom, Charles Boehmer, andJ. Joseph Hewitt (2005) “Disaggregating International Organizations in Time and Space.” Paper prepared for delivery at the annual meeting of the International Studies Association (March, Honolulu, HI; updated October 2006).
Gilpin, Robert (1981) War and Change in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Goertz, Gary (2003) International Norms and Decision Making: A Punctuated Equilibrium Model. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
Gordon, Michael (1997) “Russia-China Theme: Contain the West.” New York Times (April 26): A3.
Gruber, Lloyd (2000) Ruling the World: Power Politics and the Rise of Supranational Institutions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Haas, Ernst B (1970) The Web of Interdependence: The United States and International Organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Hafner-Burton, Emilie and Alexander H. Montgomery (2006) “Power Positions: International Organizations, Social Networks, and Conflict.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 50: 3–27.
Hanneman, Robert and Mark Riddle (2005) Introduction to Social Network Methods. Riverside: University of California (published in digital form at http://faculty.ucr.edu/~hanneman/).
Hasenclever, Andreas, Peter Mayer, and Volker Rittberger (1997) Theories of International Regimes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ikenberry, John (2001) After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order after Major Wars. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Ingram, Paul, Jeffrey Robinson, and Marc L. Busch (2005) “The Intergovernmental Network of World Trade: IGO Connectedness, Governance, and Embeddedness.” American Journal of Sociology 111: 824–858.
Jacobson, Harold K., William R. Reisinger, and Todd Mathers (1986) “National Entanglements in International Governmental Organizations.” American Political Science Review 80: 141–159.
Keohane, Robert O. (1984) After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Keohane, Robert O. and Craig N. Murphy (1992) “International Institutions,” in Mary Hawkesworth and Maurice Kogan, eds., Encyclopedia of Government and Politics, Vol. 1. London/New York: Routledge, 871–886.
Krasner, Stephen D. (1978) Defending the National Interest: Raw Materials Investments and U.S. Foreign Policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Krauthammer, Charles (1990/1991) “The Unipolar Moment.” Foreign Affairs 70: 45–69.
Leeds, Brett Ashley and Michaela Mattes (2005) “Alliance Politics during the Cold War: Aberration, New World Order, or Continuation of History.” Department of Political Science, Rice University.
Lemke, Douglas (2002) Regions of War and Peace. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Maoz, Zeev, Leslie Terris, Ranan Kuperman, and Ilan Talmud (2007) “Network Centrality and International Conflict: Does It Pay to be Important?” in T. Friemel, ed., Applications of Social Networks Analysis. Konstanz, Germany: Universitat Verlag Konstanz.
Martin, Lisa and Beth Simmons (1998) “Theories and Empirical Studies of International Institutions.” International Organization 52: 729–758.
McCall Smith, James (2000) “The Politics of Dispute Settlement Design: Explaining Legalism in Regional Trade Pacts.” International Organization 54: 137–180.
Modelski, George (1990) “Is World Politics Evolutionary Learning?” International Organization 44: 1–24.
Modelski, George and William R. Thompson (1988) Sea Power in Global Politics, 1494–1993. London: Macmillan.
Moravcsik, Andrew (1997) “Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Politics.” International Organization 51: 513–553.
Nye, Joseph S. (1992) “What New World Order?” Foreign Affairs 71: 82–96
Organski, A.F.K. and Jacek Kugler (1980) The War Ledger. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Pevehouse, Jon, Timothy Nordstrom, and Kevin Warnke (2003) “Intergovernmental Organizations, 1815–2000: A New Correlates of War Data Set.” http://cow2.la.psu.edu/. Last accessed August 25, 2008.
Powers, Kathy L. (2004) “Regional Trade Agreements as Military Alliances.” International Interactions 30 (4): 37–95.
Rapkin, David P. (2001) “The United States, Japan, and the Power to Block: The APEC and AMF Case.” Pacific Review 14: 373–410.
Russett, Bruce, John R. Oneal, and David R. Davis (1998) “The Third Leg of the Kantian Tripod for Peace: International Organizations and Militarized Disputes, 1950–85.” International Organization 52 (3): 441–467.
Sabic, Zlatko and Ana Bojinovic (2006) “State and Non-state Actors in Regional Institutional Webs: The Case of the Mediterranean.” Paper presented for delivery at the annual meeting of the International Studies Association (San Diego, CA, March).
Sanger, David E. (1997) “U.S., Lauding Its Economy, Finds No Summit Followers.” New York Times (June 20): Al.
Shanks, Cheryl, Harold K. Jacobson, and Jeffrey H. Kaplan (1996) “Inertia and Change in the Constellation of International Governmental Organizations, 1981–1992.” International Organization 50: 593–627.
Skidmore, David (2005) “Understanding the Unilateralist Turn in U.S. Foreign Policy.” Foreign Policy Analysis 1: 207–228.
Spiezio, Kim E. (1990) “British Hegemony and Major Power War, 1815–1939: An Empirical Test of Gilpin’s Model of Hegemonic Governance.” International Studies Quarterly 34: 165–181.
Strange, Susan (1989) “Toward a Theory of Transnational Empire,” in Ernst-Otto Czempiel and James N. Rosenau, eds., Global Changes and Theoretical Challenges: Approaches to World Politics for the 1990s. Lexington, KY: Lexington Books, 161–176.
Tammen, Ronald L., Jacek Kugler, Douglas Lemke, Allan C. Stam III, Mark A. Abdollahian, Carole Alsharabati, Brian Efird, and A.F.K. Organski (2000) Power Transitions: Strategies for the Twenty-frst Century. New York: Chatham House.
Vasquez, John (1993) The War Puzzle. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Volgy, Thomas J. and Alison Bailin (2003) International Politics and State Strength. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
Volgy, Thomas J. and Lawrence E. Imwalle (2000) “The Two Faces of Hegemonic Strength: Structural versus Relational Capabilities and Global Architectural Construction.” International Interactions 26: 229–251.
Volgy, Thomas J., Elizabeth Fausett, Keith Grant, and Stuart Rodgers (2008) “A New Database for ldentifying Formal Intergovernmental Organizations: Conceptual and Empirical Considerations” Journal of Peace Research (forthcoming).
Volgy, Thomas J., Kristin Kanthak, Derrick Frazier, and Robert Stuart Ingersoll (2004) “The G7, International Terrorism, and Domestic Politics: Modeling Policy Cohesion in Response to Systemic Disturbances.” International Interactions 30: 191–209.
Wallace, Michael and J.D. Singer (1970) “Intergovernmental Organizations in the Global System, 1816–1964: A Quantitative Description.” International Organization 24: 239–87.
Wasserman, Stanley and Katherine K. Faust (1994) Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Wilkinson, David (1999) “Unipolarity without Hegemony” International Studies Review 1: 141–172.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2009 William R. Thompson
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Volgy, T.J., Grant, K.A., Fausett, E. (2009). Searching for Changing Organizational Architecture during Global Transition: Where Is the Post—Cold War Order?. In: Thompson, W.R. (eds) Systemic Transitions. The Evolutionary Processes in World Politics series. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230618381_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230618381_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-37543-1
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-61838-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)