Skip to main content

Searching for Changing Organizational Architecture during Global Transition: Where Is the Post—Cold War Order?

  • Chapter
Book cover Systemic Transitions

Abstract

As the cold war concluded, President George H.W. Bush proclaimed the end of the old world order, and signaled twice that America would lead in creating a new one:

We stand today at a unique and extraordinary moment & Out of these troubled times, our fifth objective—a new world order—can emerge: a new era—freer from the threat of terror, stronger in the pursuit of justice, and more secure in the quest for peace. An era in which the nations of the world, East and West, North and South can prosper and live in harmony & Today that new world is struggling to be born, a world quite different from the one we’ve known.1 [And a year later] Now, we can see a new world coming into view. A world in which there is the real prospect of a new world order.2

These pronouncements may have been more rhetoric than an indication of strong policy preferences for constructing a new world order, or they may have constituted an initial response to changing circumstances but faded as domestic policy agendas supplanted foreign policy ones (Nye 1992). It is just as likely, however, that the president of the strongest state to emerge out of the cold war was signaling publicly and committing his foreign policy apparatus to the creation of a new international order that would be substantially different from the one just concluded.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abbott, Kenneth and Duncan Snidal (1998) “Why States Act through Formal International Organizations”. Journal of Conflict Resolution 52: 3–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, Michael N. and Martha Finnemore (1999) “The Politics, Power, and Pathologies of International Organizations.” International Organization 53: 699–732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, Michael N. and Raymond Duvall (2005) “Power in International Politics.” International Organization 59: 39–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner, Frank and Bryan D. Jones (1993) Agenda and Instability in American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bearce, David H. and Sawa Omori (2005) “How Do Commercial Institutions Promote Peace?” Journal of Peace Research 42: 659–678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beeson, Mark (2006) “American Hegemony and Regionalism: The Rise of East Asia and the End ofthe Asia-Pacific.” Geopolitics 11: 541–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borgatti, Stephen P., Martin G. Everett, and Linton C. Freeman (2002) Ucinet for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis. Cambridge, MA: Analytis Technologies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brogan, Patrick (1990) The Fighting Never Stopped: A Comprehensive Guide to World Conflict since1945. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buenode Mesquita, Bruce (2003) Principles of International Politics: Peoples Power, Preferences, and Perceptions. Washington DC: CQ Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buzan, Barry and Ole Waever (2004) Regions and Powers: The Structures of International Security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cupitt, Richard, Rodney Whitlock, and Lynn Williams Whitlock (1996) “The [Im]mortality of Intergovernmental Organizations.” International Interactions 21: 389–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diehl, Paul F. and Gary Goertz (2000) War and Peace in International Rivalry. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckholm, Erik (1999) “Bombing May Have Hardened China’s Line.” New York Times (May 8): Al.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erlanger, Steven (1997) “Clinton Basks at Summit; Some Europeans Are Cool to US.” New York Times (June 6): Al.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gartzke, Erik, Timothy Nordstrom, Charles Boehmer, andJ. Joseph Hewitt (2005) “Disaggregating International Organizations in Time and Space.” Paper prepared for delivery at the annual meeting of the International Studies Association (March, Honolulu, HI; updated October 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilpin, Robert (1981) War and Change in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Goertz, Gary (2003) International Norms and Decision Making: A Punctuated Equilibrium Model. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, Michael (1997) “Russia-China Theme: Contain the West.” New York Times (April 26): A3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, Lloyd (2000) Ruling the World: Power Politics and the Rise of Supranational Institutions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Haas, Ernst B (1970) The Web of Interdependence: The United States and International Organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hafner-Burton, Emilie and Alexander H. Montgomery (2006) “Power Positions: International Organizations, Social Networks, and Conflict.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 50: 3–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanneman, Robert and Mark Riddle (2005) Introduction to Social Network Methods. Riverside: University of California (published in digital form at http://faculty.ucr.edu/~hanneman/).

  • Hasenclever, Andreas, Peter Mayer, and Volker Rittberger (1997) Theories of International Regimes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ikenberry, John (2001) After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order after Major Wars. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingram, Paul, Jeffrey Robinson, and Marc L. Busch (2005) “The Intergovernmental Network of World Trade: IGO Connectedness, Governance, and Embeddedness.” American Journal of Sociology 111: 824–858.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, Harold K., William R. Reisinger, and Todd Mathers (1986) “National Entanglements in International Governmental Organizations.” American Political Science Review 80: 141–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keohane, Robert O. (1984) After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keohane, Robert O. and Craig N. Murphy (1992) “International Institutions,” in Mary Hawkesworth and Maurice Kogan, eds., Encyclopedia of Government and Politics, Vol. 1. London/New York: Routledge, 871–886.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krasner, Stephen D. (1978) Defending the National Interest: Raw Materials Investments and U.S. Foreign Policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krauthammer, Charles (1990/1991) “The Unipolar Moment.” Foreign Affairs 70: 45–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leeds, Brett Ashley and Michaela Mattes (2005) “Alliance Politics during the Cold War: Aberration, New World Order, or Continuation of History.” Department of Political Science, Rice University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemke, Douglas (2002) Regions of War and Peace. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Maoz, Zeev, Leslie Terris, Ranan Kuperman, and Ilan Talmud (2007) “Network Centrality and International Conflict: Does It Pay to be Important?” in T. Friemel, ed., Applications of Social Networks Analysis. Konstanz, Germany: Universitat Verlag Konstanz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, Lisa and Beth Simmons (1998) “Theories and Empirical Studies of International Institutions.” International Organization 52: 729–758.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCall Smith, James (2000) “The Politics of Dispute Settlement Design: Explaining Legalism in Regional Trade Pacts.” International Organization 54: 137–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Modelski, George (1990) “Is World Politics Evolutionary Learning?” International Organization 44: 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Modelski, George and William R. Thompson (1988) Sea Power in Global Politics, 1494–1993. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moravcsik, Andrew (1997) “Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Politics.” International Organization 51: 513–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nye, Joseph S. (1992) “What New World Order?” Foreign Affairs 71: 82–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Organski, A.F.K. and Jacek Kugler (1980) The War Ledger. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pevehouse, Jon, Timothy Nordstrom, and Kevin Warnke (2003) “Intergovernmental Organizations, 1815–2000: A New Correlates of War Data Set.” http://cow2.la.psu.edu/. Last accessed August 25, 2008.

  • Powers, Kathy L. (2004) “Regional Trade Agreements as Military Alliances.” International Interactions 30 (4): 37–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rapkin, David P. (2001) “The United States, Japan, and the Power to Block: The APEC and AMF Case.” Pacific Review 14: 373–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russett, Bruce, John R. Oneal, and David R. Davis (1998) “The Third Leg of the Kantian Tripod for Peace: International Organizations and Militarized Disputes, 1950–85.” International Organization 52 (3): 441–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabic, Zlatko and Ana Bojinovic (2006) “State and Non-state Actors in Regional Institutional Webs: The Case of the Mediterranean.” Paper presented for delivery at the annual meeting of the International Studies Association (San Diego, CA, March).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanger, David E. (1997) “U.S., Lauding Its Economy, Finds No Summit Followers.” New York Times (June 20): Al.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanks, Cheryl, Harold K. Jacobson, and Jeffrey H. Kaplan (1996) “Inertia and Change in the Constellation of International Governmental Organizations, 1981–1992.” International Organization 50: 593–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skidmore, David (2005) “Understanding the Unilateralist Turn in U.S. Foreign Policy.” Foreign Policy Analysis 1: 207–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spiezio, Kim E. (1990) “British Hegemony and Major Power War, 1815–1939: An Empirical Test of Gilpin’s Model of Hegemonic Governance.” International Studies Quarterly 34: 165–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strange, Susan (1989) “Toward a Theory of Transnational Empire,” in Ernst-Otto Czempiel and James N. Rosenau, eds., Global Changes and Theoretical Challenges: Approaches to World Politics for the 1990s. Lexington, KY: Lexington Books, 161–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tammen, Ronald L., Jacek Kugler, Douglas Lemke, Allan C. Stam III, Mark A. Abdollahian, Carole Alsharabati, Brian Efird, and A.F.K. Organski (2000) Power Transitions: Strategies for the Twenty-frst Century. New York: Chatham House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasquez, John (1993) The War Puzzle. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Volgy, Thomas J. and Alison Bailin (2003) International Politics and State Strength. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volgy, Thomas J. and Lawrence E. Imwalle (2000) “The Two Faces of Hegemonic Strength: Structural versus Relational Capabilities and Global Architectural Construction.” International Interactions 26: 229–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Volgy, Thomas J., Elizabeth Fausett, Keith Grant, and Stuart Rodgers (2008) “A New Database for ldentifying Formal Intergovernmental Organizations: Conceptual and Empirical Considerations” Journal of Peace Research (forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  • Volgy, Thomas J., Kristin Kanthak, Derrick Frazier, and Robert Stuart Ingersoll (2004) “The G7, International Terrorism, and Domestic Politics: Modeling Policy Cohesion in Response to Systemic Disturbances.” International Interactions 30: 191–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, Michael and J.D. Singer (1970) “Intergovernmental Organizations in the Global System, 1816–1964: A Quantitative Description.” International Organization 24: 239–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman, Stanley and Katherine K. Faust (1994) Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, David (1999) “Unipolarity without Hegemony” International Studies Review 1: 141–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

William R. Thompson

Copyright information

© 2009 William R. Thompson

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Volgy, T.J., Grant, K.A., Fausett, E. (2009). Searching for Changing Organizational Architecture during Global Transition: Where Is the Post—Cold War Order?. In: Thompson, W.R. (eds) Systemic Transitions. The Evolutionary Processes in World Politics series. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230618381_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics