Abstract
The definition of strategic culture selected for this volume is well-suited to consideration of the Israeli case: “Shared beliefs, assumptions, and modes of behavior derived from common experiences and accepted narratives (both oral and written), that shape collective identity and relationships to other groups, and which determine appropriate ends and means for achieving security objectives.” As explained later, Israel has cultivated—some would say imposed—a set of beliefs and assumptions on its citizenry as a means of simultaneously building and defending the fledgling Jewish state in the face of deep Islamic hostility. This belief system is rooted, in part, in such ancient texts as the Bible but is under considerable pressure from contemporary demographic, ideological, and religious changes in Israeli society. As a result, there is both continuity and change in what passes for “appropriate” ends and means of achieving security in Israeli terms. Indeed, the strategic culture framework could provide a useful tool for anticipating how the Jewish state might come to grips with its ongoing internal, as well as external, security challenges.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Recent Israeli scholarship casts doubt on this heroic account. See Baruch Kimmerling, The Invention and Decline of Israeliness: State, Society, and the Military (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2001), p. 18, n. 2.
Luis Roniger, “Organizational Complexity, Trust, and Deceit in the Israeli Air Force,” in Daniel Maman et al., eds., Military, State and Society in Israel (New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction, 2001), pp. 371–72.
Stuart Cohen, “The Scroll or the Sword? Tensions between Judaism and Military Service in Israel,” in Stuart Cohen, ed., Democratic Societies and Their Armed Forces: Israel in Comparative Context (London: Frank Cass, 2000), p. 271, n. 13.
Scott Wilson, “War Turns the Tide For Israeli Settlers,” Washington Post, September 25, 2006, Al, http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/09/24/AR2006092400757.html.
Molly Moore, “Israelis Face ‘New Kind of War’; High-Tech Tactics Fail to Halt Rocket Fire,” Washington Post, August 9, 2006, All, http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/08/08/AR2006080801229.html.
Charles Ben-Dor, “War & Peace: Jewish Tradition and the Conduct of War,” Israeli Defense Forces Journal, Vol. 3, No. 4 (Fall 1986), pp. 47–50.
Anthony H. Cordesman and Abraham R. Wager, The Lessons of Modern War, Volume I: The Arab-Israeli Conflicts, 1973–1989 (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1990), pp. 113–14.
See “Munich Massacre,” Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Munich_Massacre. See also Dan Raviv and Yossi Melman, Every Spy a Prince (Boston: Houghton Miffilin Company, 1990), pp. 184–92.
Seymour M. Hersh, The Samson Option (New York: Random House, 1991), pp. 196–207.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2009 Jeannie L. Johnson, Kerry M. Kartchner, and Jeffrey A. Larsen
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Giles, G.F. (2009). Continuity and Change in Israel’s Strategic Culture. In: Johnson, J.L., Kartchner, K.M., Larsen, J.A. (eds) Strategic Culture and Weapons of Mass Destruction. Initiatives in Strategic Studies: Issues and Policies. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230618305_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230618305_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-37694-0
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-61830-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)