Skip to main content

Conclusions Prospects of Turkish Political Culture

  • Chapter
Trials of Europeanization

Abstract

The study of EU-sponsored political reform in Turkey in the previous chapters made it clear that path dependence theory could help explain the process of liberalization of Turkish political culture.1 Turkey’s approach to the European Union required a series of political decisions, which entailed, among other things, a reconsideration of state-civil society relations, the civilianization of politics, and a new approach to secularism and national identity. As Turkey was making steps toward convergence with the Copenhagen Criteria, it became increasingly difficult to change direction and relapse to old policies and practices. The Helsinki European Council decision in December 1999 became a landmark event. Giving Turkey the status of an EU candidate state had a critical and enduring facilitating impact on the process of political liberalization.2 The increasingly realistic prospect of EU membership gave Turkey a political vision, while the Copenhagen Criteria became the yardstick against which any reform steps were measured. The increasing commitment of the 1999–2002 coalition government to Turkey’s EU accession process meant that it was willing to undertake daring reform measures to meet this target. The more the government invested political capital in the prospect of EU membership, the more difficult it became to reverse the process of political liberalization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Karen Smith, The Making of EU Foreign Policy: The Case of Eastern Europe (New York: Palgrave, 1999), 169.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gamze Avci, “Putting the Turkish EU Candidacy into Context,” European Foreign Affairs Review 7, no. 1 (2002): 99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. See Putnam, “Diplomacy and Domestic Politics,” 433–35. For a thoughtful application of Putnam’s model to a comparative analysis of Europeanization in Poland and Turkey, see Ziya Onis, “Diverse but Converging Paths to European Union Membership: Poland and Turkey in Comparative Perspective,” East European Politics and Societies 18, no. 3 (2004): 493–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Meltem Muftuler-Bac, “Turkey’s Political Reforms and the Impact of the European Union,” South European Society & Politics 10, no. 1 (2005): 18–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. On the role of the European Union as an external anchor of reform, see Nathalie Tocci, “Europeanization in Turkey: Trigger or Anchor for Reform?” South European Society & Politics 10, no. 1 (2005): 79–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. European Commission, Euro-Med Partnership Regional Strategy Paper 2002–2006 & Regional Indicative Programme 2002–2004 (Brussels: European Commission, 2001), 5.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rory Miller and Ashraf Mishrif, “The Barcelona Process and Euro-Arab Economic Relations, 1995–2005,” Middle East Review of International Affairs (MERIA) 9, no. 2 (2005): 97–100.

    Google Scholar 

  8. See European Council, Common Strategy of the European Council on the Mediterranean Region [2000/458/CFSP] (Brussels: European Council, 2000), 1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  9. European Communities, The Barcelona Process, Five Years on (1995–2000) (Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 2000), 8–10.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Meltem Muftuler Bac, “Turkey’s Accession to the European Union: Institutional and Security Challenges,” Perceptions: Journal of International Affairs 9, no. 3 (2004): 33–36.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kalypso Nicolaidis, “Europe’s Tainted Mirror: Reflections on Turkey’s Candidacy Status after Helsinki,” in Greek-Turkish Relations in the Era of Globalization, ed. Dimitris Keridis and Dimitrios Triantaphyllou (Dulles VA: Brassey’s, 2001), 275–76.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Adam Przeworski, Democracy and the Market: Political and Economic Reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991), 26, cited in Ozbudun, “Turkey: How Far from Consolidation?” 124.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. Ali Carkoglu, “Who Wants Full Membership? Characteristics of Turkish Public Support for EU Membership,” Turkish Studies 5, no. 1 (2003): 173–75.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Michael Emerson and Nathalie Tocci, Turkey as a Bridgehead and Spearhead: Integrating EU and Turkish Foreign Policy [Working Paper No. 1] (Brussels: Centre for European Policy Studies, 2003), 7.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2009 Ioannis N. Grigoriadis

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Grigoriadis, I.N. (2009). Conclusions Prospects of Turkish Political Culture. In: Trials of Europeanization. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230618053_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics