Skip to main content

The ‘Kitsch’ of War

Misappropriating Sun Tzu for an American Imperial Hypermasculinity

  • Chapter
Gender and Global Politics in the Asia-Pacific

Abstract

U.S. interest in The Art of War (sunzi bingfa, 512 BCE) has risen dramatically since 9/11.1 Both former Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld and General Tommy Franks, masterminds of the Iraq campaign, regularly quote Sun Tzu.2 The New York Times notes that insurgents in Iraq and Afghanistan may also be learning from The Art of War.3

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Milt T. Bearden, “Perspective/Inside the CIA: Iraqi Insurgents Take a Page from the Afghan ‘Freedom Fighters,’” November 9, 2003, http://query.nytimes.comgstgst/fullpage.html?res=9E00EFDB1339F93AA35752C1A9659C8B63 (accessed March 11, 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bruce Bueno de Mesquita, James D. Morrow, Randolph M. Siverson, and Alastair Smith, “Testing Novel Implications from the Selectorate Theory of War,” World Politics 56 (April 2004): 363–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Stephen Peter Rosen, “Military Effectiveness: Why Society Matters,” International Security 19, no. 4 (1995): 5–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gerald Segal, “The PLA and Chinese Foreign Policy Decision-Making,” International Affairs 57, no. 3 (1981): 449–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Emerson M. Niou and Peter C. Ordershook, “A Game-theoretic Interpretation of Sun Tzu’s The Art of War,” Journal of Peace Research 31, no. 2 (1994): 161–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. See Douglas M. Mecready, “Learning from Sun Tzu,” Military Review (May/June 2003): 85–88. The first English translation of The Art of War appeared in 1910. De-shun Lo, ed. Sun tzu bing fa (Taipei: Li-ming Wen Hua, 1991), 21–22.

    Google Scholar 

  7. James Henry, “China’s Military and Sun Tzu: What Every American Should Know,” 2004, http://www.brookesnews.com/04190/china.html (accessed March 11,2008).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Tom Adkins, “Sun Tzu Visits the Middle East,” 2002 http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/928498/posts (accessed March 11, 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  9. See also Chow-hou Wee, Sun Zi Bingfa: Selected Insights and Applications (Singapore: Pearson, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Harlan Ullman and James P. Wade, Shock and Awe: Achieving Rapid Dominance, ebook, 2005, http://www.gutenberg.org/etext/7259 (accessed March 11, 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  11. In Mark Crispin Miller, The Bush Dyslexicon: Observations on a National Disorder (New York: Norton, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  12. De-shun, Lo, ed., Sun tzu bing fa (Taipei: Li-ming Wen Hua Publishing House, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  13. David Campbell, “Cultural Governance and Pictorial Resistance: Reflections on the Imaging of War,” Review of International Studies 29 (2003): 57–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Xian Zhong Niu, Sun tzu san lun: cong gu bing fa dao xin zhan lue (Taipei: Mai Tian Publishing House, 1996) 47–49.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Note, for example, the argument about a democratic peace. This school of thought proposes that warfare will cease when all states convert to liberal democracy; see also Erik Gartzke, “The Capitalist Peace,” American Journal of Political Science 51, no. 1 (2007): 166–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Joshua Foa Dienstag, “Serving God and Mammon: The Lockean Sympathy in Early American Political Thought,” American Political Science Review 90, no. 3 (1996): 499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Carole Pateman, The Sexual Contract (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1988). Also, according to Lloyd, western intellectual thought never considered women capable of reason—the necessary criterion for entering into the social contract. Only men could transcend the banal shackles of the Body to soar into the heavenly realm of Reason. Genevieve Lloyd, Man of Reason (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Uday S. Mehta, “Liberal Strategies of Exclusion,” in Tensions of Empire: Colonial Cultures in a Bourgeois World, ed. Frederick Cooper and Ann Laura Stoler (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1997), 59–86.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. See Roxanne L. Doty, Imperial Encounters: The Politics of Representation in North-South Relations (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Michael Hunt, Ideology and US Foreign Policy (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ward Churchill, A Little Matter of Genocide: Holocaust and Denial in the Americas from 1492 to the Present (San Francisco: City Lights Books, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Charlotte Hooper, Manly States: Masculinities, International Relations, and Gender Politics (New York: Columbia University Press, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Max Boot, The Savage Wars of Peace: Small Wars and the Rise of American Power (New York: Basic Books, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Noah Feldman, What We Owe Iraq: War and the Ethics of Nation Building (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004), 95.

    Google Scholar 

  25. See L. H. M. Ling, Postcolonial International Relations: Conquest and Desire between Asia and the West (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  26. L. H. M. Ling, “Borderlands: A Postcolonial-Feminist Alternative to Neoliberal Self/Other Relations,” in ed. Susanne Zwingel, Heike Brandt, and Bettina Brass, Mehrheit am Rand? Geschlechterverhaeltnisse, globale Ungleichheit und transnationale Loesungsansaetze, 105–24 (Berlin: VS Verlag, 2008).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. Ping-ti Ho, Youguan sunzi laozi de sanpian kaocheng (Three Studies on Sun Tzu and Lao Tzu) (Taipei: Institute of Modern History, Academica Sinica, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Shan-ch’un Yang, Sun Tzu (Taipei: Zhishufang Publishers, 1999), 227. Translation by the authors.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Tingyang Zhao, “Rethinking Empire from a Chinese Concept ‘All-under-Heaven’ (Tian-xia),” Social Identities 12, no. 1 (January 2006): 30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. L. H. M. Ling, “Borders of Our Minds: Territories, Boundaries, and Power in the Confucian Tradition,” in States, Nations, and Borders: The Ethics of Making Boundaries, ed. Margaret Moore and Allen Buchanan (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  31. James L. Hevia, Cherishing Men from Afar: Qing Guest Ritual and the Macartney Embassy of 1793 (Durham: Duke University Press, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Hwa Yol Jung, “Confucianism and Existentialism: Intersubjectivity as the Way of Man,” Philosophy and the Phenomenological Research 30, no. 2 (December 1969): 193–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Wai-Yee Li, “The Idea of Authority in the Shih chi (Records of the Historian),” Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 54, no. 2 (December 1994): 395, 399, 400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Hevia, Cherishing Men from Afar, Xu 2003. Xu, Jie Ling (2003) “Chunqiu bangjiao sixiang shulun.” Qiushi xuekan (Seeking Truth) 30(1) January: 106–10.

    Google Scholar 

  35. L. H. M. Ling, “Rationalizations for State Violence in Chinese Politics: The Hegemony of Parental Governance,” Journal of Peace Research 31, no. 4 (November 1994): 393–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Bartley, Caleb M. (2005) “The Art of Terrorism: What Sun Tzu Can Teach Us about International Terrorism.” Comparative Strategy 24: 237–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Dongpuo Li, “Sunzi zhanzhengguan xinlun” (A New Approach to Sun Tzu’s View of War), Zhexue baijia 6 (2007): 190–92.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Zhanwu Wei and Zhongxiang Jing, “Lun ‘Sunzi bingfa’ zhong de zhexue tixi yu zheli tedian (On the Philosophical System and Philosophical Distinguishing Characteristics of Sun-tzu’s Art of War),” Journal of Jilin National University, Humanities and Social Science Edition 1 (February 2007): 9–12.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Liou Yang, “Guanzi de guojia guanxi sixiang ganwei” (A Brief Probe into Guanzi’s Inter-State Theory), Guanzi xuekan 4 (2006): 9–11.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2009 Bina D’Costa and Katrina Lee-Koo

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hwang, CC., Ling, L.H.M. (2009). The ‘Kitsch’ of War. In: D’Costa, B., Lee-Koo, K. (eds) Gender and Global Politics in the Asia-Pacific. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230617742_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics