Abstract
Gender equality is widely believed by international organizations and mainstream commentators to contribute to the consolidation of democratic norms and domestic and international peace.1 The United Nations (UN) has promoted strategies for achieving gender equality as a central part of its peacebuilding and reconstruction programs. In Bosnia, Kosovo, and East Timor, UN missions have incorporated gender mainstreaming and gender-balanced decision-making policies and programs to foster civil society as means to ensure long-term peace and development. To what extent, though, are these institutional initiatives able to transform the deep-seated gendered social hierarchies in these new states? Feminist scholars argue that such hierarchies are at the root of violence against women, women’s lack of voice, and political representation. They hold that any meaningful democratic strategy must eliminate these hierarchies to bring about political freedom and equality. In Timor these feminist perspectives on gender justice and equality are an emerging part of the public debate about the processes of democratization in state and civil society. They can be seen in speeches, communications, and reports of local women’s organizations, donor agencies, NGOs, and the UN, however, this political activity has yet to be theoretically analyzed by feminist or nonfeminist scholars. Here we seek to highlight some of the gendered practices of democratization and assess the struggles within East Timorese civil society to forge a gender-equal democracy.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Isabel Coleman, “The Payoff for Women’s Rights,” Foreign Affairs 83, no. 3 (2004): 80–95.
Maxine Molyneux, “Mobilization Without Emancipation? Women’s Interests, State and Revolution,” in Transition and Development: Problems of Third World Socialism, ed. Richard R. Fagen, et al. (New York: Monthly Review Press, 1985), 280–320.
Elizabeth Rehn and Ellen Johnson-Sirleaf, “Women, War, Peace: The Independent Experts,” in Assessment on the Impact of Armed Conflict on Women and Women’s Role in Peace-building (New York: UNIFEM, 2002);
Pamela Paxton, “Women’s Suffrage in the Measurement of Democracy: Problems of Operationalization,” Studies in Comparative International Development 35, no. 3 (2000): 92–111;
J. Ann Tickner, Gender in International Relations: Feminist Perspectives on Achieving Global Security (New York: Columbia University Press, 1992);
Sherrill Whittington, “Gender and Peacekeeping: The United Nations Transitional Administration in East Timor,” Signs 28, no. 4 (2003):1283–88.
Cynthia Enloe, Bananas, Beaches and Bases: Making Feminist Sense of International Politics (London: Pandora, 1989).
Jacqui True, “Gender Specialists and Global Governance Organizations: New Forms of Women’s Movement Mobilization,” in Women’s Movements: In Abeyance or Flourishing in New Ways?, ed. Marian Sawer and Sandra Grey (New York: Routledge, 2008), chapter seven.
Lesley Abdela, “Kosovo: Missed Opportunities, Lessons for the Future,” in Development, Women, and War: Feminist Perspectives, ed. Haileh Afshar and David Eade (Oxford: Oxfam, 2004), 87–99.
Sofi Ospina, “Participation of Women in Politics and Decision-Making in Timor-Leste: A Recent History,” Unpublished Report (Dili: UNIFEM, 2006), 12.
Ibid., 18–22; Gender Affairs Unit and Cliondah O’Keeffe, Situational Analysis of Gender in Post-Conflict East Timor (Dili, East Timor, 2002), 10–11.
Irena Cristalis and Catherine Scott, Independent Women, The Story of Women’s Activism in East Timor (London: Catholic Institute for International Relations, 2005), 54–56.
Sue Downie, “UNTAET: State-building and Peace-building in East Timor,” in East Timor Beyond Independence, ed. Damien Kingsbury and Michael Leach (Melbourne: Monash University Press, 2007), 29.
Cecilia Brunnstrom, “Another Invasion: Lessons from International Support to East Timorese NGOs,” Development in Practice 14, no. 4 (2003): 310–21.
Anna Trembath and Damian Grenfell, Mappingthe Pursuit of Gender Equality, Non-Government and International Agency Activity in Timor-Leste (Melbourne, Australia: The Globalism Institute, RMIT University, 2007).
Milena Pires, “East Timor and the Debate on Quotas.” International IDEA, Regional Workshop on the Implementation of Quotas: Asian Experiences (Jakarta: September 2002), 38.
See Martha Alter Chen, “Engendering World Conferences: The International Women’s Movements and the United Nations,” in NGOs, the UN and Global Governance, ed. Thomas G. Weiss and Leon Gordenker (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 1996), 139–55. The Gender Affairs Unit (GAU), UNIFEM, and Rede Feto worked together to organise six weeks of back-to back training, 140 women were trained.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2009 Bina D’Costa and Katrina Lee-Koo
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hall, N., True, J. (2009). Gender Mainstreaming in a Post-conflict State. In: D’Costa, B., Lee-Koo, K. (eds) Gender and Global Politics in the Asia-Pacific. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230617742_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230617742_10
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-37673-5
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-61774-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)